Around Yesterday, "Kris Kennaway" wrote :
KK I'll take a closer look at this tonight and try and commit it to internat
KK (and freefall), lag willing (if it passes a world build). If someone can
KK confirm the world build for me in the meantime, it would save me the
KK trouble.
I didn't
It seems John Hay wrote:
I tried to install 4.0-RELEASE on a completely new PC system, but the
install failed with ATA write errors and resets. I moved the disk to another
PC and installed 4.0 via manual disklabels, newfs, bin + src extraction.
4.0 booted fine on this system (a Dell
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Peter Wemm writes:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Bruce Evans writes:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Bruce Evans writes:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
I think we should nuke csu_hdr since it's not used anywhere. Is that
what you really
Hi,
The ppp built from the just cvsup'ed -current sources segfaulting. Following is
backtrace. Please contact me of some additional debugging info will be
necessary.
-Maxim
PPP ON vega
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x806e98e in sl_compress_tcp (m=0x809e000, ip=0x809e01c,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
I think we ought to re-examine the definition of load average. By
load, we mean an actual load on the cpu, and waiting processes aren't
really exerting a cpu load. So, by that reasoning I say
I tried to install 4.0-RELEASE on a completely new PC system, but the
install failed with ATA write errors and resets. I moved the disk to another
PC and installed 4.0 via manual disklabels, newfs, bin + src extraction.
4.0 booted fine on this system (a Dell Optiplex GX1).
It seems John Hay wrote:
Yup VIA has a new version of the 82C596 chip, in their usual visdom they
change the interface, but not the chip ID (I'll nominate VIA for the
way they do versioning). However I have worked out the solution with
Chris Wiener [EMAIL PROTECTED], that had this
On 4/04, John Hay wrote:
| I have a machine that can be trashed. The trouble is that it cannot
| install 4.x or -current because of the problem with the ata driver.
| During installation it just go in a loop during newfs and keep on
| spitting out errors.
You are lucky, you go further than I
At 8:14 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
Besides, CURRENT does allow for the tree to be broken. I guess Bleeding
Edge lost its meaning within the FreeBSD ranks.
Yes, but RELENG_4 is no longer -CURRENT. Therefore, different
procedures need to be applied to it, now
At 8:23 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
Like I said in another mail, this is CURRENT, things are
expected to break. You want stability of API's, go 3-STABLE. You want
a somewhat stable environment, go 4-STABLE. 5 is bleeding edge, have
your bandages ready.
It seems Brad Knowles wrote:
Like I said in a previous message, Poul broke vinum (among other
things) under 4.0-STABLE, and this needs to be fixed ASAP. If Poul
had kept his changes unique to -CURRENT, then 4.0-STABLE wouldn't
have been affected. But he didn't, and it was.
Where
Yup VIA has a new version of the 82C596 chip, in their usual visdom they
change the interface, but not the chip ID (I'll nominate VIA for the
way they do versioning). However I have worked out the solution with
Chris Wiener [EMAIL PROTECTED], that had this problem also and
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 08:14:40AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
Ehm. Not as if your VM stuff wasn't causing disruption. Needed,
granted, but disruptive as well. And ucd-snmp has been broken quite
some time (still is?) due to the work.
And I know of a lot of people who actively use
Brian Somers writes:
Sorry, I should have done more than a few greps when reviewing this.
While we're in self-castigation mode here ;), _I_ should have done
more than a few greps before *committing* this.
My first pointy hat in 5 years, not bad (of course, I don't do all
that much committing).
Hi Ben :)
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 05:41:05PM -0400, a little birdie told me
that Ben Rosengart remarked
Hello all,
I am running a 5.0-CURRENT system cvsup'd this afternoon, and sshd is
not working for me. When I try to start it, I get the following:
** RSA_PKCS1: Unable to find an RSA
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 05:28:52PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Hi Ben :)
Hello Matthew, always nice to "see" you.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 05:41:05PM -0400, a little birdie told me
that Ben Rosengart remarked
Hello all,
I am running a 5.0-CURRENT system cvsup'd this afternoon, and
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:27:25PM -0400, Christopher Masto wrote:
Regarding USB drives, I have been using the Orb "2.2GB" USB-SCSI
version with some success. There do seem to be some serious
filesystem corruption problems, but I haven't had time to determine
where they're coming from. I
Why does this sound like the warning that is written in the manual of
the Iomega Zip drive:
do not connect more than one Zip drive to the same USB host data
might corrupted.
Or something similar...
Nick
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at
Hi all,
What is the proper way for obtaining the signal mask from
within the jmp_buf struct on 4.x or -current? Previously
with the JDK port for 3.x we did something like this:
signalMask = jmpbuf[0]._sjb[6];
This no longer works now that we support 32 signals. Is
there a better,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:07:55AM +0100, Nick Hibma wrote:
Why does this sound like the warning that is written in the manual of
the Iomega Zip drive:
do not connect more than one Zip drive to the same USB host data
might corrupted.
Or something similar...
But.. but.. I
On Sun, 2406 Sep 1993, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I've committed an 80% fix for the random seek / write
performance issue. The rest of the fix will come later
when Kirk commits his shared-lock-buffer-cache idea.
I've committed it into -current and will MFC it into
-stable
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:32:36AM +1000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I can just see all the coolness seeping out. Now guys, we have to
have as a goal something at least as comparable as what IBM did
with one of their mainframes. Oh, say, lets shoot for being able to
run 4000 copies
:Woo. Okay, so I took the bait and snarfed the k0deZ from midday GMT
:02.April, and have built a suitable SMP kernel and world, and that's
:what I've been running for one news peering swerver for a spell.
:
:...
:
:As I noted in the earlier message I just sent, disabling the write-
:behind via
:Hi all,
:
:What is the proper way for obtaining the signal mask from
:within the jmp_buf struct on 4.x or -current? Previously
:with the JDK port for 3.x we did something like this:
:
: signalMask = jmpbuf[0]._sjb[6];
:
:This no longer works now that we support 32 signals. Is
:there a
Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges
and why won't ANYBODY answer the question?
Thanks in advance,
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges
and why won't ANYBODY answer the question?
Because it's been answered about a dozen times already; it's down with
hardware problems, and the people responsible are trying to do something
about it.
--
\\ Give a man
current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine.
/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
\/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP public key: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Takahashi Yoshihiro writes:
: There is not ISA bus on PC-98. So, we can't use devices for ISA bus on
: PC-98. But, PC-98 has `Cbus' which is like ISA bus in software place.
: As most codes for ISA bus are useful for Cbus, the code for Cbus is
: based on the code for
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
** RSA_PKCS1: Unable to find an RSA implemenation shared library.
(Aren't those filenames reversed? Just a hunch...)
Thanks for catching these - I've just fixed the typos.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509
I just upgraded a 3.4 system from the Jan. 2000 CD to 5.0 -current.
I used the 3.4 CD as an installation vehicle to get -current on a new
disk, cleaning the tree in the process. I removed about 100MB that
had accumulated over three years tracking -current. I had an
existing -current system,
What is the proper way for obtaining the signal mask from
within the jmp_buf struct on 4.x or -current? Previously
with the JDK port for 3.x we did something like this:
signalMask = jmpbuf[0]._sjb[6];
This no longer works now that we support 32 signals. Is
there a
On Wed, 5 Apr 19100, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:performance -- innd was still unresponsive during the time that the
:random history database files needed updating for somewhere around
:10 to 15 seconds when handling a full feed.
The innd problem is a different issue entirely, one related
On Tuesday, 4 April 2000 at 15:31:00 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Brad Knowles wrote:
Like I said in a previous message, Poul broke vinum (among other
things) under 4.0-STABLE, and this needs to be fixed ASAP. If Poul
had kept his changes unique to -CURRENT, then 4.0-STABLE
On Tuesday, 4 April 2000 at 15:33:43 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message v04220803b50f8d254208@[195.238.1.121], Brad Knowles writes:
At 8:23 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
Like I said in another mail, this is CURRENT, things are
expected to break. You
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
The problem in vinum/releng4 is the problem greg has been blaming
on CAM since at least FreeBSDcon and indications seems to be that
it is actually a malloc/free gottcha in vinum.
No, this is not correct. The problem you're talking about I
35 matches
Mail list logo
