Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

2001-08-25 Thread Jim Bryant
Peter Wemm wrote: Jordan Hubbard wrote: Because of certain differences, it cannot be used wholesale as a replacement for csh. Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention. This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when we first raised the issue of

Re: diskcheckd is poo

2001-08-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David W. Chapman Jr. writes: On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a real one; it's also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your disks up). I have the shar of the

Re: another panic (mix ppp and usb to taste)

2001-08-25 Thread Brian Somers
As I was trying to let the Palm Pilot connect to my desktop through usb using PPP, I tried to run /usr/sbin/ppp -quiet -direct -nat /dev/ugen0 FWIW, that should be: /usr/sbin/ppp -quiet -direct -nat /dev/ugen0 as ppp -direct needs to be able to write to descriptor 0 too.

Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

2001-08-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:50:33AM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: For 5.0, I maybe the black sheep in saying this, but I'd like to see /bin/csh be the real thing for 5.0. By all means, leave tcsh in /bin, but for the sake of backwards compatability, IMHO `ln /bin/tcsh /bin/csh` was a bad idea.

Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

2001-08-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: So yes, there's a difference. But, on the flip side, I think that the fact that it's been this long without anybody screaming majorly (after the initial shakedown, of course)

Re: unknown PNP hardware

2001-08-25 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W. Chapman Jr. writes: : I'm running -current as of an hour ago. I've gotten this since I've : been running 4.2-stable, any ideas on how I can find out what it : belongs to? : : unknown: PNP0303 can't assign resources : unknown: PNP0501 can't assign

-current buildworld broken

2001-08-25 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Hello. cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I. -DDISASSEMBLER -DNO_X -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i38 6/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c /usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c: In function `init_mapfile': /usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c:1124: `MAP_INHERIT' undeclared (first use in this function)

Re: -current buildworld broken

2001-08-25 Thread Matt Dillon
:Hello. :cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I. -DDISASSEMBLER -DNO_X -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i38 :6/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c :/usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c: In function `init_mapfile': :/usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/ems.c:1124: `MAP_INHERIT' undeclared (first use in this :function)

APM and PCM compatibility.....

2001-08-25 Thread Michael G. Jung
All: On one of my machines at work I run current and had been without audio until I found a posting where a user noted that enabling APM in the kernel broke audio Heh... I disabled apm/pmtimer and my PCM device works great While I don't really care about APM on my machine - I wanted to

diskcheckd port

2001-08-25 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
I'm almost finished with the port for diskcheckd. I'm just waiting on a repo copy of the config file I forgot to include in my repo request. When it is time to change it over from src to ports in modules, I'd appreciate some help since I haven't made any src commits before. Thanks. --

ports diskcheckd patch

2001-08-25 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
After the repo copy of the diskcheckd.conf gets done this patch should be the last one I need to make ports/sysutils/diskcheckd to work properly. Any comments/problems would be appreciated. I would especially appreciate some patches to pkg-descr for a more detailed description if possible.

KSE milestone-2

2001-08-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Diffs for KSE milestone 2 are at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian (about 1.8MB) Thanks to Matt Dillon who tracked down the last major instability. This is i386 only (some other diffs included but not working) This pushes the 'thread' pointer through nearly all of the kernel in preparation for

Re: KSE milestone-2

2001-08-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:37:24PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Diffs for KSE milestone 2 are at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian (about 1.8MB) Thanks to Matt Dillon who tracked down the last major instability. This is i386 only (some other diffs included but not working) This

Re: KSE milestone-2

2001-08-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Bosko Milekic wrote: On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:37:24PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Diffs for KSE milestone 2 are at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian (about 1.8MB) Thanks to Matt Dillon who tracked down the last major instability. [...] Do you plan to commit this chunk

Re: options HZ [MFC for pr=28143]

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Smith
It should be a tunable, not a compile-time option. David Hill wrote: Hello - Could someone please document options HZ into LINT?. I found it whil e reading the dummynet(4) manpage. Thanks - David To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: unknown PNP hardware

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Smith
Going off on a slight tangent, I wrote a perl script months ago that parsed the output of dmesg, and tried to determine which IRQs were used, and for what. One of the side-effects of this script is that it also tried to identify unknown PCI devices (but *only* if an IRQ is used), using

Re: exec issue in tcsh?

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Smith
* Jim Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010823 01:33] wrote: i noticed this after a build from -current of about 24 hours ago: due to problems getting kde-2.2 to compile under -current, I am currently using windowmaker and doing a `exec startx /dev/null` to get into X without leaving a

Re: options HZ [MFC for pr=28143]

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Mike Smith wrote: It should be a tunable, not a compile-time option. David Hill wrote: Hello - Could someone please document options HZ into LINT?. I found it whil e reading the dummynet(4) manpage. It must remain a compile-time option for those of us