It seems Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Soeren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to get this into 5.0 (I know its late, but life's tough)
This brings ATA support to the PC98 arch will all bells and whistles.
--- sys/conf/files 28 Nov 2002
Kirk McKusick wrote:
Ah
No wonder, I tried editing the /sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile
to enable UFS2 bootblock but then disklabel complained that
boot2 was too big. I will have to revert to UFS1
Thanks
Manfred
You have hit upon the exact
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:44:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use an usb modem under freebsd. It is detected during boot.
My system is current as of yesterday sources. Dmesg output is attached.
Modem is recognized as /dev/ugen0 and there is another node
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McKusick wr
ites:
You will have to ask Puol-Henning Kamp, but I do not believe that
he has yet put together a bootstrap for the i386 platform that can
boot from a UFS2 filesystem. As such, I believe that you are
required to have a UFS1 root on the i386 at this
I rebuilt the whole of KDE on DP2 (upto date as of a couple of days
ago). Apart from me growing older in the process nothing worked well,
despite using the same configuration as on 4.7.
- It starts but no sound arises
- The mouse moves, responds to clicks sometimes, but when I bring up the
menu
FWIW, I recently build KDE3 on a 5.0-DP2 notebook.
I just copied the /etc/X11/XF86Config from the working 4.7-Stable partition,
kld-loaded the pcm sound, and voilà, everything works fine.
do you know if your XF86Config is correct ?
have you loaded the sound driver ?
Cheers,
* Mitsuru IWASAKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Iwasaki-san,
list members,
ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [FAN_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_NOT_FOUND
I think that this was caused by the following spec changes.
From CHANGES.txt:
Recently there was a discussion about jails on some freebsd list. Someone
recommended vnconfig(8)ed file-backed disk for jail file systems. Terry
wrote there are problems with it. I liked the idea and played with
mdconfig(8)ed devices on current. Terry was right - I can easily make the
system
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
Hello,
it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
for my tiny /var-partition and after that it dumps core while trying to
dump my not so tiny /usr partition.
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-11-28 17:00, Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
changes the time two hours because of the TZ). No message from
ntpdate
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-11-28 17:00, Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
changes the time two hours because of the
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
do record locking in the shared memory segment.
Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
the SysV shared memory. However flock() has the same problem
as
I have no problems at all running KDE on DP2.
Did you load a sound driver? The complaints about /dev/dsp not existing seem
to indicate that you didn't load a sound driver.
You might want to check your XF86Config file again, because I'm sure you can
find an explanation for the default
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-11-28 17:00, Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found out that ntpdate just doesn't seem to be working at all
during boot. Ntpd dies because of the time differential (windows
changes the time two
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Brian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
do record locking in the shared memory segment.
Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
the SysV shared
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Brian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
do record locking in the shared memory segment.
Ok, I did this, and it
Subject says it all.
I wanted to make vnode-backed md(4) and forgot to specify size, thas it
after 'touch mdfile;mdconfig -a -t vnode -f mdfile' mdconfig process can't
be killed. It's wchan ('ps axO wchan|grep mdconf') is mddest.
--
Michal Mertl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
Including rwatson because of the thread on hackers@.
Sorry for follow-up to myself.
Recently there was a discussion about jails on some freebsd list. Someone
recommended vnconfig(8)ed file-backed disk for jail file systems. Terry
wrote there are
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily.
I had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to
test Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
I've noticed that chroot() environments
At 10:56 AM 11/30/2002 -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
Hello,
it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
for my tiny /var-partition and after that it dumps core
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:43:38 +
From: Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: newfs chokes, cores, dies if inode density too high;
patch attached
Ok, I got another one. DDB output attached. I did all kinds of operations
to trigger it - had 3 md mounted from the same dir, in 2 of them doing my
ports.tgz torture test and in root file system I had 'find . -inum
1231231' running. One find finished succesfully but then it finally
locked-up.
At 10:56 AM 11/30/2002 -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
Hello,
it seems to me that 'dump' (8) is not able to dump UFS2 Filesystems.
First it shows an extraordirarily large number of estimated tape blocks
for my tiny /var-partition and after that it dumps core
Your deadlock should now be fixed.
Kirk McKusick
=-=-=-=-=
From: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:27:12 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
mckusick2002/11/29
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:44:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Reifenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: corrupted UFS2 label after ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.198
Hi,
after cvsupping a kernel with
isn't it about time we got away from puting the bootblocks in a
filesystem partition?
Here, all these planets^H^H^H^H^H^Hblocks are yours, to do as you
please,
except the first 16 blocks.. attempt no landing there
(or however it went).. (Appologies to Mr. Clark).
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
isn't it about time we got away from puting the bootblocks in a
filesystem partition?
I actually reached that conclusion back when we realized that the UFS2
bootblocks did not fit the 8k magic zone.
From the next branch on -current, it is
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:36:21 -0800
From: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Reifenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: corrupted UFS2 label after ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.198
...
Once you have upgraded
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 01:08:51PM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
I did a search and tried some syntax like 0 for the irq etc. but no
way to put
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michal
Mertl writes:
Subject says it all.
Fixed in md.c revision 1.74 - this was discussed here a few days
ago, but I was just waiting for approval to commit the fix.
Ian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Manfred Antar wrote:
I guess dump is not ready for UFS2
I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and did
not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from Nov 24th.
--
-- wrzask --= v =-- Winfried --=-- GG# 3838383 --=-- JS500-RIPE
I'm getting this on several of my alphas. Any ideas? The traceback
and panic message is weird.
Kris
axp4# gdb -k kernel.debug vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to
I get this when building 5.0 under 4.x, for the purposes of installing
into a temporary directory. Any ideas?
Kris
=== etc/sendmail
rm -f freefall.cf
(cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail m4
-D_CF_DIR_=/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
From the next branch on -current, it is my intent to not install
BSD labels anymore, but switch to GPT instead, (possibly encapsulated
in an BSD MBR slice for legacy systems).
Do you mean this GPT:
http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/tech/storage/GPT_FAQ.asp
or are you
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:35:32PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I get this when building 5.0 under 4.x, for the purposes of installing
into a temporary directory. Any ideas?
Kris
=== etc/sendmail
rm -f freefall.cf
(cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail m4
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:40:59PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
=== etc/sendmail
rm -f freefall.cf
(cd /local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail m4
-D_CF_DIR_=/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/
/local0/src-5.x/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 freefall.mc)
Brian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:05:34 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Use mmap of a backing-store file, and then use file locking to
do record locking in the shared memory segment.
Ok, I did this, and it actually works considerably better than
the SysV shared memory. However flock()
I recently upgraded a Dell Lattitude C600 from some version
of -stable after 4.3 to 5.0-current. I first upgraded it
to 4.7-stable, then to 5.0-current. I followed the instructions
at the end of src/UPDATING pretty much to the letter.
I haven't recompiled any applications for 5.0, so they're
Daniel Eischen wrote:
No, libc_r doesn't properly handle flock. Usually, all syscalls
that take file descriptors as arguments honor the non-blocking
mode of the file if set. I guess flock(2) doesn't and has its
own option to the operation argument (LOCK_NB).
I hacked libc_r to
On Saturday 30 November 2002 23:24, you wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Manfred Antar wrote:
I guess dump is not ready for UFS2
I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and
did not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from
Nov 24th.
Sure you dumped an
I've got a notebook running current, and I've got a horde of problems I
need some help fixing...
1) ACPI lets me control fans and cpu speed nicely, and the notebook will
suspend nicely, and it almost resumes properly. When the notebook wakes up
it comes back on the network and the keyboard works
Michal Mertl wrote:
I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily. I
had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to test
Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
After the first lock-up I tried 'while(1);tar xzf ports.tgz; rm
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
I just have made dump and restore of my 3GB UFS2 /usr partition and
did not experience any problems with that. Working on -CURRENT from
Nov 24th.
Sure you dumped an UFS2 filesystem?
Here's my try:
root@current - /root
104 # uname -a
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Michal Mertl wrote:
I'm now unable to make it dead-lock again. Yet it happened quite easily.
I had more md backing files in the same directory at the beginning (to
test Terry's suspicion mentioned in thread 'jail' on hackers@).
I've noticed that
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
Hm, this is weird. I'm sure I have dumped an UFS2 filesystem earlier and
it worked. Now I get similar error messages as you. Yes, I'm absolutely
sure that the filesystem was UFS2 - played with extattrctl on it, checked
it with dumpfs and was not able
M. Warner Losh wrote:
: - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A large
component of the decision to remove it from the base was the high
incidence of security problems with the original code. That, coupled
with the
I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
the mailing lists, I haven't found a solution to this.
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
coutHello World\n;
}
... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo.cc
foo.cc: In function `int main()':
foo.cc:5: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:48:00PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote:
I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
the mailing lists, I haven't found a solution to this.
The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Rodrigues writes:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:48:00PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Gro
up wrote:
I've been working on getting the tripwire port to build on -CURRENT.
Through this process I've stumbled across an issue. Searching through
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Garret
t Rooney writes:
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
coutHello World\n;
}
... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo.cc
foo.cc: In
Barkley Vowk wrote:
I've got a notebook running current, and I've got a horde of problems I
need some help fixing...
1) ACPI lets me control fans and cpu speed nicely, and the notebook will
suspend nicely, and it almost resumes properly. When the notebook wakes up
it comes back on the network
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Garret
t Rooney writes:
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
coutHello World\n;
}
... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo.cc
Hello, i have a little problem with APM (Adv. Power Managment)
I migrate from 4.7-STABLE to 5.0-CURRENT version. But in process i have lost
apm0 device in dmesg.
Device /dev/apm is in, but apmd daemon does not start cozz /dev/apmctl device
not exist.
Tell me please how to modify this strings
In message 002501c298d3$63c3c150$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew
Emmerton w
rites:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Garret
t Rooney writes:
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
coutHello World\n;
}
Sergey V Golitzyn wrote:
Hello, i have a little problem with APM (Adv. Power Managment)
I migrate from 4.7-STABLE to 5.0-CURRENT version. But in process i have lost
apm0 device in dmesg.
Device /dev/apm is in, but apmd daemon does not start cozz /dev/apmctl device
not exist.
kozaczek# kldload
At 7:06 PM -0800 11/27/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
My /usr/sbin/adduser, updated on Nov/23/2002 21:58 JST, does
not call pw command. It adds account to /etc/master.passwd and
invokes 'pwd_mkdb'.
See 'sub new_users' function in /usr/sbin/adduser.
There are two
[to follow-up on what I said in a different thread...]
On my 5.0-dp2 system, if I ignore /usr/local and /usr/ports, it
looks like the following files installed by -dp2 are perl scripts:
/usr/bin/mmroff
/usr/bin/afmtodit
/usr/sbin/adduser
/usr/sbin/rmuser
My Thinkpad 600X doesn't recognize any PC cards since I installed
5.0-DP2. PC cards worked fine on it under -CURRENT back in February
(before the NEWCARD merge and rc_ng) and they worked fine under -STABLE
since then. I haven't been tracking -CURRENT since February, so maybe I
missed something
Try adding hw.pccard.cis_debug=1 to /boot/loader.conf and let me know
the results.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi, everybody,
Have somebody use the /usr/src/tools/KSE/ksetest/ksetest? I want to
test about KSE. I cvsuped my box a few days ago. my kern_thread.c
version is 1.66.
When I use the ksetest, the box is crashed.
the information as follow:
Current# ./ksetest
main() : 0x804c000
eip - 0x280ae973
Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote:
does the problem still occur if you add in 'using namespace std'?
Thanks. That also fixed it.
Yeah. Just remember that the standard namespace isn't.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Emiel Kollof wrote:
Can this be patched by doing some subtitutions in the files that use the
old mount syscall? Or is it more hairy than that?
Can you try the attached patch and tell me if it works ?
There were stupid
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Emiel Kollof wrote:
* Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
Yes, this one seems to work.
Hold on.. now remote hosts _see_ the ext2fs share, but mounting will not
64 matches
Mail list logo
