On 05/28/2012 07:07 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:44:42PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 06:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
From clog.c in http://www.netlib.org/cephes/c9x-complex
double complex
ccosh (z)
double complex z;
{
double complex w;
On 28 May 2012, at 05:35, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Yesterday r236148 (Allow inclusion of libc++ cmath to work after including
math.h) was comitted to head, many thanks.
Does this mean, that extra long double functions like acoshl, expm1l or
log1pl are now really implemented? As far as I
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:14:40PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Running a make -s -j5 buildworld; cleaned the entire obj tree meanwhile.
Builds are running on a slightly older HEAD thought with an updated libc
and some headers.
I can reproduce this all the time. Buildworld at this stage
On 05/27/2012 07:05, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make
On 28. May 2012, at 08:42 , Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:14:40PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Running a make -s -j5 buildworld; cleaned the entire obj tree meanwhile.
Builds are running on a slightly older HEAD thought with an updated libc
and some headers.
I can
On 2012-May-27 18:05:41 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
this (old) branch.
Another con: make delete-old on -current takes about 2 orders
On 28.05.2012 10:41 (UTC+1), David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 05:35, Rainer Hurling wrote:
First I should note that I am by no means an expert in C / C++ or C99
standards. So my comments are only on a level of someone who is using
FreeBSD for scientific purposes like GIS and math
On 28 May 2012, at 13:30, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 28.05.2012 10:41 (UTC+1), David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 05:35, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Ok, that's what I had supposed. Because the main difference between r236147
and r2136148 seems to be the define of _MATH_EXTRA_H_, the rest is
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:52:15AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
To respond to my own mail again:
* should the cardbus slot peripherals be detached and reattached upon
resume? Or should it be just suspend/resumed?
* here's what I see during suspend:
wlan1: link state changed to DOWN
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-04-28 13:12, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Is there in official way to get this fixed with CLANG? I see that
files folder in graphics/dri is missing, so none of the fixes for both
the faulty source files
I think the patch should go to
On 28.05.2012 14:49 (UTC+1), David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 13:30, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 28.05.2012 10:41 (UTC+1), David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 05:35, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Ok, that's what I had supposed. Because the main difference between r236147 and
r2136148
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
port, using a rather clever patch due to Peter Jeremy, that applies to
the cephes code.
What it would do is to create a /usr/local/lib/libm.so that would
I'm pro improving completeness, as most people are
really surprised when after setting WITHOUT* they
are left with old cruft from first install, what's more
important- it's getting left as is with all possible
(security) bugs.
Just be careful, as after recent expansion it looked
here like
On 2012-05-24 22:50, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
On 24/05/2012 20:21, Dimitry Andric wrote:
I've seen these too, and it seems clang produces debug info which
ctfconvert can't handle, for some reason. However, in my case, the
kernel build doesn't abort at all, it continues and all the object
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make delete-old
* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
this (old) branch.
Another con: make delete-old on -current takes about 2 orders of
magnitude longer to
On 2012-05-28 11:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
...
I needed to update headers to be able to recompile ifconfig after some
additions; then got bitten by that not compiling as libc didn't include
the symbol for _ThreadRuneLocale yet but the header was already picked up.
So had to re-do libc as well.
On 05/28/2012 12:52, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
E.g. when WITHOUT_foo
On 2012-May-28 23:55:42 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
this (old) branch.
Another con:
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:59:17 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
wrote:
this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
introduced seem to bear me out. :)
Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:04:03 +1000 Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com
wrote:
My experience is that it now takes about 2½ minutes on 10.x with warm
caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x. For most of that time,
there's no output and there's no warning of the increased time. I
actually
On 05/28/2012 13:23, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:59:17 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
wrote:
this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
introduced seem to bear me out. :)
Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
It
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
port, using a rather clever patch due to Peter Jeremy, that applies to
the
On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
port, using a rather clever patch due to
On 2012-May-28 11:01:24 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
port, using a rather clever patch due to Peter Jeremy, that applies to
On 2012-May-28 13:31:59 -0700, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
introduced seem to bear me out. :)
Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
It doesn't catch things it needs to
It catches things it shouldn't
The current
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:22PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions.
* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
this (old) branch.
Another con: make delete-old on -current takes about 2 orders of
magnitude
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:04:36AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-May-28 13:31:59 -0700, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:05:07AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-May-28 11:01:24 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
step...@missouri.edu wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port that adds
the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
port,
On 05/28/2012 05:17 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:22PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
One thing that could be done is to have a math/cephes port
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 05:17 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:22PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen
On 05/28/2012 06:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
From clog.c in http://www.netlib.org/cephes/c9x-complex
double complex
ccosh (z)
double complex z;
{
double complex w;
double x, y;
x = creal(z);
y = cimag(z);
w = cosh (x) * cos (y) + (sinh (x) * sin (y)) * I;
return
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:44:42PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 06:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
From clog.c in http://www.netlib.org/cephes/c9x-complex
double complex
ccosh (z)
double complex z;
{
double complex w;
double x, y;
x = creal(z);
I had same problem, but I resolved it.
Maybe, your sort (/usr/bin/sort) is broken.
cd /usr/src
make update
cd usr.bin/sort
make obj depend all install
Then, sort is changed.
make cleandir cleandir
make buildworld
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On 5/28/2012 3:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
introduced seem to bear me out. :)
Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
It doesn't catch things it needs to
It
So, the newer sort works fine, and the older sort does not work ? Did I get
your correctly ?
Thanks
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 8:45 PM
To:
On 2012-May-28 15:54:06 -0700, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Given that cephes was written years before C99 was even
conceived, I suspect all functions are sub-standard.
Well, most of cephes was written before C99. The C99 parts of
cephes were written to turn it into a
39 matches
Mail list logo
