Hello
Bad news, to day two servers with applayed patches get L2ARC degraded
L2 ARC Summary: (DEGRADED)
Passed Headroom:4.17m
Tried Lock Failures:635.53m
IO In Progress: 41.89k
Low Memory
TB --- 2013-10-25 06:23:13 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-25 06:23:13 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Hi.
On 24.10.2013 16:56, Alexandre Martins wrote:
We have seen some issues with the VIA VX900 chipset. The main trouble is that
some SATA hard drive are not seen by the kernel (BIOS and boot-loader are OK).
After investigations, it seems that during the initialisation of the
controler, some
Just after system reboot with this patch
found
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_compress_successes: 6083
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_compress_zeros: 1
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_compress_failures: 296
compression on test pool (where I'm test this patch) is lz4
so is it ok ?
Steven Hartland
On Thursday 24 October 2013 23:17:59 Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 24/10/13 22:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 24/10/13 13:01, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Roger Pau Monn?
roger@citrix.com
I would have expected zero for all l2_compress values.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net; Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net;
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Hi,
I've tried to create an image with nanobsd and I could not add packages
to that image.
Nanobsd needs to be updated to work with pgkng. Now it works with
pkg_add and pkg_add is not present in FreeBSD 10.0
Does anyone have a patch for that? I want to add packages to the build.
best
On 24.10.2013 05:46, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I have motherboard (MSI Z77 MPOWER) with Realtek 8111E Ethernet that fails
to
connect in FreeBSD or OpenBSD, OK with NetBSD-current and Linux, and
Atheros AR9271 onboard wifi: device athn is included in NetBSD (current
only)
and OpenBSD.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Maciej Milewski wrote:
M I've encountered problems with installing FreeBSD-10.0-BETA1 i386 under
M VirtualBox.
M The problem is with setting/changing root password during install
M process. After entering password twice there is:
M
M passwd:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 21:50, Sean Bruno sean_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:24 -0400, David Chisnall wrote:
Don't forget the freelocale() at the end.
ah, ok. I wish that there was some kind of example that I could go off
of in the man page. I'm sort of trundling my way
Hi Cedric,
Am 13.09.2013 11:34, schrieb Cedric GROSS:
Not against 10-current. But if you wish, you could test with my
version on github https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN Use LKGV
branch, should be running with 10-current. Cedric
finally I had a chance to test the driver. I installed a
Hello fellow hackers!
I finally reach the point when I can work with newcons instead of
syscons on my laptop. Yes, I know it still buggy and have a lot of
style(9) problems. But we really have to get it into HEAD and 10.0 to
enable shiny new Xorg features, drivers, etc.
So I ask everyone to look
Hi there,
I've 10.0-BETA1 i386 installed and I want to use a swap file instead
of a swap partition. I created /swapfile and I'm able to enable it
manually by following commands:
mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /swapfile -u 0
swapon /dev/md0
This is according to the following section of the Handbook:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:18:47 +0300
Aleksandr Rybalko r...@ddteam.net wrote:
Hello fellow hackers!
I finally reach the point when I can work with newcons instead of
syscons on my laptop. Yes, I know it still buggy and have a lot of
style(9) problems. But we really have to get it into HEAD
Erm, I don't think this is really ready for -HEAD yet?
-adrian
On 25 October 2013 06:04, Aleksandr Rybalko r...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:18:47 +0300
Aleksandr Rybalko r...@ddteam.net wrote:
Hello fellow hackers!
I finally reach the point when I can work with
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Erm, I don't think this is really ready for -HEAD yet?
Lets do it really ready :)))
I'am free on that, I can merge or not merge it to 10.0. But x11 team
depend on newcons presence, otherwise no new Xorg, no KMS
3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it to be ready
for MFC for a 10.1 release.
4) Delay 10.0 until this has matured enough in HEAD, then release it.
I really want to see more updated xorg support but the timing of it all
feels a little overly rushed for a 10.0 release
I think we should provide option - use beta-newcons or old.
Linux in top is not because it's better, but because it has solution. Not even
finished but at least some solutions.
On Friday 25 October 2013 06:43:54 Adrian Chadd wrote:
3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 06:38 -0400, David Chisnall wrote:
I'm simply trying to address the warnings that appear due to clang.
I
find the builds very noisy and if there's a better way to address
this
issue, I'm totally open to suggestions.
Well, for contrib code that isn't going to be
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it to be ready
for MFC for a 10.1 release.
4) Delay 10.0 until this has matured enough in HEAD, then release it.
I really want to see more updated xorg support but the
Spent some time investigating warnings emitted by the build for libopie
and such.
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/libopie_warns.txt
Most of this is harmless and clang emits clear directives and solutions
to solve these warnings. Patch attached to do just that and make the
build happy.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:10:44 +0100
symbol...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it to be ready
for MFC for a 10.1 release.
4) Delay 10.0 until this has matured enough in HEAD, then release
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:18:15 +0300 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:10:44 +0100 symbol...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
3) Realise it's not yet ready for 10.0 or HEAD, and target it to be ready
for MFC for a 10.1 release.
4) Delay
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:27:49 +0200
Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:18:15 +0300 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:10:44 +0100 symbol...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
3) Realise it's not yet ready
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Rostislav Krasny rosti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I've 10.0-BETA1 i386 installed and I want to use a swap file instead
of a swap partition. I created /swapfile and I'm able to enable it
manually by following commands:
mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /swapfile -u
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0300, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:18:47 +0300
Aleksandr Rybalko r...@ddteam.net wrote:
Hello fellow hackers!
I finally reach the point when I can work with newcons instead of
syscons on my laptop. Yes, I know it still buggy and
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Rostislav Krasny rosti@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Rostislav Krasny rosti@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I've 10.0-BETA1 i386 installed and I want to use a swap file instead
of a swap partition. I created /swapfile and I'm able to
On 10/25/13 9:29 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Erm, I don't think this is really ready for -HEAD yet?
certainly not ready for 10..
but that doesn't mean it can not be in 10.1
the existing console will still be there as default, and if this
truely is a big step forward, people will start using it in
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko r...@ddteam.net wrote:
Hello fellow hackers!
I finally reach the point when I can work with newcons instead of
syscons on my laptop. Yes, I know it still buggy and have a lot of
...
Yes, it's build and work
# uname -a
FreeBSD x220.local
between 10.0-BETA1 and 11.0-CURRENT.
I've been fighting this battle for a LONG time. I had hoped(!) that it
would be solved by the systems being
closer in rev but that didn't happen.
I'd LOVE someone to look at it.
I can provide ssh / root access to both machines.
Error Message:
received
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 12:07 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
between 10.0-BETA1 and 11.0-CURRENT.
I've been fighting this battle for a LONG time. I had hoped(!) that it
would be solved by the systems being
closer in rev but that didn't happen.
I'd LOVE someone to look at it.
I can provide
On 2013-10-25 12:33, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 12:07 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
between 10.0-BETA1 and 11.0-CURRENT.
I've been fighting this battle for a LONG time. I had hoped(!) that
it
would be solved by the systems being
closer in rev but that didn't happen.
I'd LOVE
TB --- 2013-10-25 17:34:48 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-25 17:34:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
I think the best thing to do is address kib's issues and whatever else pops
up in the review, then add it into -HEAD as the non-default console type.
What I'd hate to see is some build time dependency where xorg _requires_
you to run newcons in order to run X. Well, at least just right now.
I
On 2013-10-25 14:33, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article c0a42b456769e22f908e689a1de56...@webmail.lerctr.org,
Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
Error Message:
received 320KB stream in 1 seconds (320KB/sec)
receiving incremental stream of vault/var@2013-10-25 into
In article c0a42b456769e22f908e689a1de56...@webmail.lerctr.org,
Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
Error Message:
received 320KB stream in 1 seconds (320KB/sec)
receiving incremental stream of vault/var@2013-10-25 into
zroot/backups/TBH/var@2013-10-25
cannot receive incremental stream:
TB --- 2013-10-25 17:50:42 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-25 17:50:42 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-10-25 19:48:18 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-25 19:48:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 2013-10-25 17:09, J David wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
cannot receive incremental stream: invalid backup stream
It may help to decouple the steps. I.e. do a zfs send blah blah
file then copy the file and do a zfs recv blah blah file on the
On 2013-10-25 17:17, J David wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
we've tried this, and still the same issue.
Post that and the shorter local-only reproduction then, so people
don't spend time looking at the network layer.
So. I'm not sure how to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
cannot receive incremental stream: invalid backup stream
It may help to decouple the steps. I.e. do a zfs send blah blah
file then copy the file and do a zfs recv blah blah file on the
second host.
If nothing else, it
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
we've tried this, and still the same issue.
Post that and the shorter local-only reproduction then, so people
don't spend time looking at the network layer.
So. I'm not sure how to diagnose it.
The message out of zfs
TB --- 2013-10-25 19:51:33 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-25 19:51:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:17:50PM + I heard the voice of
Diane Bruce, and lo! it spake thus:
Log:
- calendar uses cpp internally, this diff removes this usage and
substitutes a limited subset cpp processor internally.
(I'm sorta guessing at this change being the responsible one,
Hello Everyone,
I'm attaching the newest version of the ns8250 UART patch.
After some discussions I decided to go with busy-wait + timeout solution.
The applied delay should handle exotic corner cases (please notice
that we can't use ns8250_delay()
to get the actual single transmission time since
To keep everyone informed on what is taking so long with 10.0-BETA2,
here is where we stand at the time of this writing:
- A problem was found after freebsd-update(8) builds were finished for
10.0-BETA1 which, because of a file within contrib/openpam containing
a tilde ('~'), would cause
TB --- 2013-10-26 04:44:48 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-26 04:44:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
47 matches
Mail list logo
