Hi,
I found other problems in the oce driver during some experiments with
netmap in emulation mode.
In details:
- missing locking:
- in some functions there are write accesses on the wq struct (tx queue
descriptor)
without acquire LOCK on the queue, particularly in oce_wq_handler() that is
On 7/15/14, Bruno Lauzé brunola...@msn.com wrote:
I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI really
think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software,
imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev,
libprop and
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi,
I found other problems in the oce driver during some experiments with
netmap in emulation mode.
What about driver version 10.0.747.0? At least in my configuration it works
perfectly, no crashes despite keeping it running for
I used the oce driver in CURRENT.
I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
10-STABLE.
I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
10-STABLE and I'll send you some feedback.
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 10:28 GMT+02:00 Borja
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I used the oce driver in CURRENT.
I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
10-STABLE.
I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
10-STABLE and I'll send you some
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I used the oce driver in CURRENT.
I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
10-STABLE.
I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
10-STABLE and I'll send you some
I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
I send you a file with both patches.
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:12 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es:
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I used the oce driver in CURRENT.
I think that this patch in
On 07/05/14 15:10, David Chisnall wrote:
On 5 Jul 2014, at 14:07, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Interestingly, -Wno-uninitialized has been in bsd.sys.mk since r76861,
and the accompanying comment (XXX Delete -Wuninitialized by default for
now -- the compiler doesn't always get it
On 07/09/14 18:31, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 07/08/14 21:17, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
...
I think we need to design this to be as generic as possible. I have
quite a bit of code that does this stuff but I haven't pushed it
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:19 GMT+02:00 Stefano Garzarella stefanogarzare...@gmail.com:
I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
I send you a file with both patches.
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to work.
Do you have a panic?
Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suffer panics before, right?
Borja.
___
2014-07-15 11:46 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es:
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suffer panics before, right?
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
So far, so good. I've ran a couple of iperf3 tests (60 seconds, trying both
directions) and it doesn't crash.
Without the fixes I
2014-07-15 12:00 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es:
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
So far, so good. I've ran a couple of iperf3 tests (60 seconds, trying
On Jul 15, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
So, asking for spiritual counsel now. Would you use this driver in a
production environment instead of the 747 version downloaded from Emulex? I
think the latter is giving slightly better performance but, anyway, I disable
LRO and
Hello everybody,
It seems there are problems with demandling some kinds of names with
libcxxrt.so.1 on FreeBSD 9.2 (I didn't test other versions yet).
This program:
---
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
extern C char* __cxa_demangle(const char* mangled_name,
char* buf,
Hi Ivan,
The demangler in libcxxrt is taken from the elftoolchain project. Kai Wang
(added to cc:) was interested in improving it, but I doubt any fixes will be
merged to 9.x any time soon.
David
On 15 Jul 2014, at 14:11, Ivan A. Kosarev i...@ivan-labs.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
It
Info at http://slexy.org/raw/s21qACK3qQ.
On the 1st boot after the panic, the crash dump failed due to insufficient
amount of space on /. Then I removed some files, restarted the system, and the
dump was redone. Is it correct to assume that the dump was not damaged?
[-stable to bcc; keeping -current]
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 07/05/14 15:10, David Chisnall wrote:
On 5 Jul 2014, at 14:07, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Interestingly, -Wno-uninitialized has been in bsd.sys.mk since r76861,
and the accompanying comment
On Friday, July 11, 2014 6:50:43 pm Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:38:56PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Nathan Whitehorn, and lo! it spake thus:
I don't honestly remember where that number came from. It's at line
72 of usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/partedit_x86.c. If 128
TB --- 2014-07-15 21:39:21 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-07-15 21:39:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2014-07-15 20:02:10 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-07-15 20:02:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2014-07-15 21:33:25 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-07-15 21:33:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
23 matches
Mail list logo
