On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> IPFilter 5 does IPv6 NAT.
>>>
>>> With the import of 5.1.2, map, rdr and rewrite rules will all work with
>>> IPv6 addresses.
>>>
>>> NAT66 is a specific implementatio
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Darren Reed
wrote:
[...]
IPFilter 5 does IPv6 NAT.
With the import of 5.1.2, map, rdr and rewrite rules will all work
with
IPv6 addresses.
NAT66 is a specific implementation of IPv6 NAT behaviour.
2014-07-29 00:07 Kevin Oberman wrote:
And all IPv6 NAT is ev
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
> On 27/07/2014 4:43 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message <53d395e4.1070...@fastmail.net>, Darren Reed writes:
> >> On 24/07/2014 1:42 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > But, lack of ipv6 fragment processing still causes ongoing pain.
> That'=
> >
Am Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:19:50 -0700
Peter Wemm schrieb:
> Are you using pf and IPv6 by any chance? Since you mentioned the FreeBSD.org
> domain,
> DNSSEC and IPv6 triggers fragments. Just a thought.
>
> --
> Peter Wemm. pe...@wemm.org
>
>
> > On 28 Jul 2014, at 6:50 am, O. Hartmann wrote:
Are you using pf and IPv6 by any chance? Since you mentioned the FreeBSD.org
domain, DNSSEC and IPv6 triggers fragments. Just a thought.
--
Peter Wemm. pe...@wemm.org
> On 28 Jul 2014, at 6:50 am, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>
> Since local_unbound update and the suggested update procedure as re
Updating of port net/openldap24-server fails grandios with the following error:
===> Installing for openldap-sasl-server-2.4.39_2
===> Registering installation for openldap-sasl-server-2.4.39_2
pkg-static:
lstat(/usr/ports/net/openldap24-server/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/openldap/pw-sha2.so.
Since local_unbound update and the suggested update procedure as requested with
TAG
20140719 the connection to the net hangs (DNS resolving). This is very often
with the
freebsd.org domain the case, while domestic domains rarely show this strange
behaviour.
The problem occurs on ALL CURRENT sy
On 27/07/2014 4:43 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <53d395e4.1070...@fastmail.net>, Darren Reed writes:
>> On 24/07/2014 1:42 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> But, lack of ipv6 fragment processing still causes ongoing pain. That'=
> s our=20
> #1 wish list item for the cluster.
>>> Taking
