I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
On 31 July 2014 14:41, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:02:22PM +1000, Da R
------
From:"krad";
Date:2014??8??1??(??) 3:39
To:"Gleb Smirnoff";
Cc:"freebsd-current";"FreeBSD
Questions";
Subject:Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the
------
From:"krad";
Date:2014??8??1??(??) 3:39
To:"Gleb Smirnoff";
Cc:"freebsd-current";"FreeBSD
Questions";
Subject:Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the
July 31 2014 2:41 AM, "Darren Pilgrim" wrote:
>>
>> No. I believe pf should be removed from FreeBSD and efforts refocused
>> on keeping ipfw up to date and feature complete. It makes more sense to
>> look at what pf, ipf, nbtables, etc. are all doing as a source of ideas
>> for what we can do with
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 530, Issue 5, Message: 1
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:02:22 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> On 07/29/14 20:35, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Mike. wrote:
> > M> |> imho, the root problem here is that an effort to implement a
> > M> single
On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:46, Mark Felder wrote:
> I personally use pf for many reasons, spamd included. I don't think anyone
> out there is interested in forking spamd to play ball with ipfw so we would
> also be alienating these users who can't just change packet filters. Is there
> even an equiv
After the unbound update - or coinciding this update in CURRENT - I have
massive and
disturbing problems connecting to some sites, email servers and even the SVN
server of
FreeBSD (ports and src).
For some name resoltions I receive
Host xxx.xxx.de not found: 2(SERVFAIL), while another domain t
Am 01.08.2014 um 18:25 schrieb O. Hartmann:
>
> After the unbound update - or coinciding this update in CURRENT - I have
> massive and
> disturbing problems connecting to some sites, email servers and even the SVN
> server of
> FreeBSD (ports and src).
>
> For some name resoltions I receive
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:22:27PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> Jan,
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
> > On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > >At the console, depressing and holding a key does not lead to auto-repeat.
> > >
> > >At the console, so
Hi!
On 1 August 2014 11:18, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:22:27PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
>> Jan,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:56:23PM +0200, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
>> > On 31.07.2014 16:21, Anton Berezin wrote:
>> > >At the console, depressing and holding a key
Cy Schubert wrote this message on Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:18 -0700:
> In message om>
> , Adrian Chadd writes:
> > On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote:
> > > that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not the
> > > way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly n
Hi,
Maybe this is a problem caused by a misdetected clock source? I've had
this problem as well.
I've appended the patch I've been using to fix this problem on this
Intel Core2Duo T6570 processor. There are some model IDs hardcoded in
the TSC detection code that enable TSC even though it's n
Can you file a pr with this patch?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
That way we don't lose track of it.
Thanks!
-a
On 1 August 2014 11:48, Jan Kokemüller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Maybe this is a problem caused by a misdetected clock source? I've had
>> this problem as well.
>
>
> I've appended th
On 01.08.2014 20:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Can you file a pr with this patch?
Done:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192316
Cheers,
Jan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curr
So, I have a laptop that devd loads the bluetooth module every time..
This means I get the following error on every boot:
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
Is there any real benefit to this warning? I
So, I decided to play around w/ vt after the recent UTF-8 discussion,
and noticed some issues w/ it...
First, if you load the gallant font, things don't look very good... This
is probably because of the fact that I'm using the vga driver:
VT: running with driver "vga".
and the default resolution
Just what I've got in January 2011:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
Svata
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:34 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> So, I have a laptop that devd loads the bluetooth module every time..
>
> This means I get the following error on eve
Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 00:05 +0200:
> Just what I've got in January 2011:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
Sadly, after three (or six+) years, it is clear that these bugs will
not be fixed, and this warning message is
I'd just make it a panic. :)
-a
On 1 August 2014 15:21, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 00:05 +0200:
>> Just what I've got in January 2011:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034037.html
>
> Sadly, after thr
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'd just make it a panic. :)
Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at runtime?
Marko
>
> -a
>
>
> On 1 August 2014 15:21, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Svatopluk Kraus wrote this message on Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 00:05
On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I'd just make it a panic. :)
>
> Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at runtime?
Well, why is it saying that? is there actually a problem?
-a
___
Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 16:25 -0700:
> On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> >> I'd just make it a panic. :)
> >
> > Are you prepared to say goodbye to kldloading netgraph at runtime?
>
> Well
On 1 August 2014 16:42, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 16:25 -0700:
>> On 1 August 2014 15:55, Marko Zec wrote:
>> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:42:30 -0700
>> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'd just make it a panic. :)
>> >
>> > Are you prepared t
On 1 August 2014 17:18, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> So, I decided to play around w/ vt after the recent UTF-8 discussion,
> and noticed some issues w/ it...
>
> First, if you load the gallant font, things don't look very good... This
> is probably because of the fact that I'm using the vga driver:
On 8/1/14, 3:39 PM, krad wrote:
I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
since ipfw now has a 'nat' keyword you might say that is has c
25 matches
Mail list logo
