On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:11, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
How would it be in a port? It involves modifying core utilities (some of
which, like ifconfig, rely on kernel APIs that change between releases) to
emit structured output. Maintaining two copies of each utility, one in the
On 03/01/15 13:25, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package
, since processing XML in base
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package
, since processing XML in base is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or
HTML
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver
that I'm planning to commit in the near future.
A description of the changes is here and below in this message.
If you have tape hardware
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver
that I'm
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver
that I'm
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(4) driver and mt(1) driver
that I'm planning to commit in the near future.
A description of the
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have a fairly
On 2015-03-01 19:20, Arseny Nasokin wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 22:10, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-03-01 13:49, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing
Awesome news my friend. I got distracted with some fire drills this week,
but
I'll make it a priority to get the ixl changes committed next week.
Thanks to you and everyone involved for getting this done.
Jack
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2474/changes
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about filesystems,
users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of df, w, netstat
hard to read/maintain and often broken.
I don't think it would be good to continue with this. Maybe the effort
should be put to creating new
How about we allow JSON input on those utils too... Then we get into
full-blown hell faster.
Hmm... I would like to talk with system using JSON. JSON would be in
utils that are or at least function similarly to rm, mv, ls, find,
mount, zpool, zfs, geom, mdconfig, tar, df, netstat, ifconfig... (or
On 3/1/15 4:29 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:11, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
How would it be in a port? It involves modifying core utilities (some of
which, like ifconfig, rely on kernel APIs that change between releases) to emit
structured output. Maintaining
On 3/1/15 4:57 PM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
I like the idea behind this... where I'm running into difficulty is why
these bits of functionality need to be combined. What someone does with
ifconfig on the command line, versus what someone wants to know about
their network interfaces in an XML
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015
On 2015-03-01 13:49, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additional
utilities anyway.
(If I'm
On 1 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Harrison Grundy harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com
wrote:
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additional
On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have updated
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:26:01 -0500
Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-03-01 08:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about
filesystems, users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of
df, w, netstat hard
On 2015-03-01 08:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about filesystems,
users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of df, w, netstat
hard to read/maintain and often broken.
I don't think it would be good to continue
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 11:26:01AM -0500, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-03-01 08:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
Is there a specific bug you are running in to? So far the only bugs I've
seen with the xo-ification have been ones where the JSON output was not
always well formed.
Given the
On 03/01/15 05:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about
filesystems, users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of
df, w, netstat hard to read/maintain and often broken.
I don't think it would be good to continue
On Mar 1, 2015, at 09:25, Harrison Grundy harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com
wrote:
Due to the lack of XML parsing code in -base, the difficulty in
maintaining yet another interface, and the overhead involved in doing
it, I don't quite see where one would really want XML output *and* be
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
If someone could summarize what this is, I'd greatly appreciate it.
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2014-July/015633.html
___
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additional
utilities anyway.
(If I'm reviving a long-settled thing, let me know and I'll drop
On 03/01/15 11:11, David Chisnall wrote:
On 1 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Harrison Grundy
harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com wrote:
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning
behind putting into base, over a port or package, since
processing XML in base is a pain, and it can't serve
On Mar 1, 2015, at 5:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) madis...@hot.ee wrote:
Hello.
First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about filesystems,
users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of df, w, netstat
hard to read/maintain and often broken.
I don't think it would be
32 matches
Mail list logo
