Re: [Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

On 2016-Jul-9, at 8:53 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> On Jul 9, 2016, at 18:52, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210953 >> >> Mark Millard changed: > > I accidentally committed this regression to kern.mk. I don't have

[PATCH] microoptimize locking primitives by introducing randomized delay between atomic ops

If the lock is contended, primitives like __mtx_lock_sleep will spin checking if the owner is running or the lock was freed. The problem is that once it is discovered that the lock is free, multiple CPUs are likely to try to do the atomic op which will make it more costly for everyone and

Re: [PATCH] microoptimize locking primitives by introducing randomized delay between atomic ops

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:13:26PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > If the lock is contended, primitives like __mtx_lock_sleep will spin > checking if the owner is running or the lock was freed. The problem is > that once it is discovered that the lock is free, multiple CPUs are > likely to try to do

Re: [PATCH] microoptimize locking primitives by introducing randomized delay between atomic ops

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 03:22:47PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:13:26PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > If the lock is contended, primitives like __mtx_lock_sleep will spin > > checking if the owner is running or the lock was freed. The problem is > > that once it

Re: ls eat high CPU time when LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 and LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8

I can reproduce it on a clean 11.0-BETA1 VM. 2016-07-09 9:03 GMT+08:00 Huang Wen Hui : > For some reasons, r302324 seems not include in 11.0-ALPHA6? > > 2016-07-09 8:52 GMT+08:00 Huang Wen Hui : > >> Revert back r302324, Chinese locale problem is gone. >>

Re: ls eat high CPU time when LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 and LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 04:23:03PM +0800, Huang Wen Hui wrote: > I can reproduce it on a clean 11.0-BETA1 VM. > > > 2016-07-09 9:03 GMT+08:00 Huang Wen Hui : > > > For some reasons, r302324 seems not include in 11.0-ALPHA6? > > > > 2016-07-09 8:52 GMT+08:00 Huang Wen Hui

GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? Subject: svn commit: r412619 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind99 Author: mat Date: Wed Apr 6 13:53:09 2016 New Revision: 412619 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412619 Log:

Re: [PATCH] microoptimize locking primitives by introducing randomized delay between atomic ops

On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 13:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > If the lock is contended, primitives like __mtx_lock_sleep will spin > checking if the owner is running or the lock was freed. The problem > is > that once it is discovered that the lock is free, multiple CPUs are > likely to try to do the

ipfw sched show output mangled (PR/bug 210882)

Hi, I have filed the PR in the subject [1], I'd like to ask if someone could have a look, it's a bug I noticed on head which is also going to affect 11.0 if not corrected in time. Since r270424, the output of certain ipfw show commands is mangled, due to buffers not being cleaned between uses.

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. > > Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? > > AFAIK openssl maintainers says something like they can't support this > code

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> >>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. Can be this enabled

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. >>> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? >> >> AFAIK openssl

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On 10.07.2016 18:28, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 18:13, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>> On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa

Re: ath (AR9460) no longer works after going to 11-STABLE r302483

* Wolfgang Zenker [160710 19:47]: > * Adrian Chadd [160709 21:33]: >> There weren't any changes in net80211 between those times, and ath(4) >> only has some changes for locationing; nothing that should cause that >> particular issue. >> I'll go

Re: amd64 -> armv6 [and powerpc64] -r302331 -> -r302412 re-cross-build (update): got "sh: ./make_keys: Exec format error" again for init_ketry.h in ncursesw

On 2016-Jul-8, at 12:23 AM, Mark Millard wrote --but with a few []'d notes added: > [Before the below cross build/update attempt I updated my amd64 from -r302331 > -> -r302412.] > > Summary: It appears that WITHOUT_META_MODE= still needs to be forced for > cross compiles

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On 10.07.2016 18:13, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am surprised lack of support

Re: ath (AR9460) no longer works after going to 11-STABLE r302483

Hi, * Adrian Chadd [160709 21:33]: > There weren't any changes in net80211 between those times, and ath(4) > only has some changes for locationing; nothing that should cause that > particular issue. > I'll go update to the latest -head on something with that NIC and test >

Re: [Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

> On Jul 9, 2016, at 23:03, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2016-Jul-9, at 8:53 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > >>> On Jul 9, 2016, at 18:52, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: >>> >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210953 >>> >>> Mark Millard

Re: ath (AR9460) no longer works after going to 11-STABLE r302483

Hi, That message just means a receive interrupt was handled whilst the NIC was in reset, which is mostly fine. Since you've reverted the ath driver directories without success, I'm mostly out of simple ideas. I think you need to bisect the whole kernel version until you find the commit that