For me, the following code is still necessary for me (HP Spectre x360
2018), which is the remaining parts of the patches not committed if you
are using a recent kernel. I don't know about you all ThinkPad users, it
should still apply as it's Intel in general not just HP or Lenovo.
Without
On 10/20/19 3:42 AM, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
This is a patch to a file used in the port itself, not to the kernel
sources under /usr/src/sys. This should be pretty clear from this line
in the referenced link to the posting in freebsd-current: # cat
files/patch-linuxkpi_gplv2_src_linux__page.c
On 10/21/2019 4:14 AM, Neel Chauhan wrote:
For me, the following code is still necessary for me (HP Spectre x360
2018), which is the remaining parts of the patches not committed if you
are using a recent kernel. I don't know about you all ThinkPad users, it
should still apply as it's Intel in
On 10/18/2019 8:01 AM, Xin Li wrote:
Another (semi-fixed!) data point -- I can confirm that with if
(vm_page_sleep_if_busy(page, "linuxkpi"))
-> if (!vm_page_busy_acquire(page, VM_ALLOC_WAITFAIL)) change and
mjg@'s earlier patch at
https://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/pmap-fict-invl.diff (please
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 22:07:52 -0500
Clay Daniels wrote:
> On 10/19/19 4:54 AM, Evilham wrote:
> > Have you seen the recent threads about this?
> > Particularly this with some steps that worked-for-me (tm):
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2019-October074660.html
> >
> > --