Ronald Klop:
> On 1/11/24 03:21, Lexi Winter wrote:
> > i'm building packages with poudriere on a system with 32GB memory, with
> > tmpfs and md disabled in poudriere (so it's using ZFS only) and with the
> > ZFS ARC limited to 8GB.
> My first guess would be that you are using a tmpfs tmp dir
On Jan 12, 2024, at 09:57, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 08:47, Mark Millard wrote:
> ram_attach is based on regions_to_avail but that is a problem for
> its later bus_alloc_resource use --and that can lead to:
>
> panic("ram_attach: resource %d failed to attach", rid);
>
>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:15 PM Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Tomek CEDRO writes:
> > I am reading this interesting discussion and please verify my general
> > understanding:
> > 1. There is a request for change in core OS / FS mechanism of file
> > access time (atime) because of problem with
On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 08:47, Mark Millard wrote:
> ram_attach is based on regions_to_avail but that is a problem for
> its later bus_alloc_resource use --and that can lead to:
>
> panic("ram_attach: resource %d failed to attach", rid);
>
> Unfortunately, the known example is use of EDK2 on
Tomek CEDRO writes:
> I am reading this interesting discussion and please verify my general
> understanding:
>
> 1. There is a request for change in core OS / FS mechanism of file
> access time (atime) because of problem with mailing application?
The atime mechanism is considered harmful by many
Am 2024-01-11 18:15, schrieb Rodney W. Grimes:
Am 2024-01-10 22:49, schrieb Mark Millard:
> I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never
> propose
> changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid:
[good points I fully agree on]
There's one
