On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, John Polstra wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > you want to commit?
> >
> > (after you sir...)
>
> No, really, after you ... :-)
Done
in 3.1 and 4
julian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> This is follow up of my previous requesting for help on setting the pci ed1
> (NE2000) NIC. I had followed the advice to set device ed1 in my config file
> and reinstall using the procedures config -r kernel-name, make depend &&
> make all && make install at the ../../compile/kernel-name. Aft
Julian Elischer wrote:
> you want to commit?
>
> (after you sir...)
No, really, after you ... :-)
Seriously, I don't know the code in question very well. I'd rather
not commit it myself.
John
---
John Polstra j...@polstra.com
John D. Polstra &
you want to commit?
(after you sir...)
julian
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, John Polstra wrote:
> In article ,
> Tony Finch wrote:
> > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > >
> > >i just experienced the above today while trying diskless, and while
> > >ls only seems to return the entries for the topmost directory,
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >i just experienced the above today while trying diskless, and while
> >ls only seems to return the entries for the topmost directory, files
> >are accessible if you know the name. no idea if this is of any help.
>
> This is exactly the
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>(about union mounts on 3.1 not returning all files with an 'ls' in
>3.1 while it did in 3.0)
>
>> Is it sorrect that this magic is implemented in sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c?
>> The odd thing is that AFAICS no-one has made significant changes to
>> this code.
>
>i just experienced
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <36d4b092.8b076...@partitur.se> Palle Girgensohn writes:
> : I've seen three crashes in the last couple of weeks, with a server
> : box that's been running stable as a rock for two years, at least. It
> : has an adaptec 2940UW with six disks, and an adaptec 1542CP
Hello,
This is follow up of my previous requesting for help on setting the pci ed1
(NE2000) NIC. I had followed the advice to set device ed1 in my config file
and reinstall using the procedures config -r kernel-name, make depend &&
make all && make install at the ../../compile/kernel-name. After
make clean && make world
cc -O -pipe -DMD5 -DSHA1 -DRMD160 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/mtree/compare.c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/mtree/compare.c:52: sha.h: No such file or directory
/usr/src/usr.sbin/mtree/compare.c:55: ripemd.h: No such file or directory
/usr/src/usr.sbin/
(about union mounts on 3.1 not returning all files with an 'ls' in 3.1
while it did in 3.0)
> Is it sorrect that this magic is implemented in sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c?
> The odd thing is that AFAICS no-one has made significant changes to
> this code.
i just experienced the above today while trying d
"Søren Schmidt" wrote:
>
> Nope, that code snippet is in atapi.c its not in any of the drivers...
> (and newer has been).
You're right. Goes to show how long I haven't touched this part of
the code. Alas, just reviewed it out of curiosity. It sure got more
readable... :-) But I still hate those
I believe you are right about login.conf being used.
But let me describe in more detail the problems I encountered with sshd.
From sshd.c:
/* Check if .hushlogin exists. Note that we cannot use userfile
here because we are in the child. */
sprintf(line, "%.200s/.hus
It seems Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> "Søren Schmidt" wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is the ARS_BSY signal. If my memory doesn't fail me, if
> > > ARS_BSY is active, then the other signals may contain trash. In this
> > > particular loop, ARS_BSY could be active, but it wasn't being
> > > checked for,
"Søren Schmidt" wrote:
>
> > The problem is the ARS_BSY signal. If my memory doesn't fail me, if
> > ARS_BSY is active, then the other signals may contain trash. In this
> > particular loop, ARS_BSY could be active, but it wasn't being
> > checked for, on the assumption that ARS_DRQ would only be
It seems Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> On the code:
>
> > ireason = inb (ata->port + AR_IREASON);
> > ac->result.status = inb (ata->port + AR_STATUS);
> > phase = (ireason & (ARI_CMD | ARI_IN)) |
> > - (ac->result.sta
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > It was somehow distressing, though, that the new code had the exact
> > same bug as the old, even though it was quite different code.
>
> When you say "the new code", are you referring to the newer acd driver
> as opposed to the older wcd driver? If so, do you think it'
At 09.52 26/02/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I have FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE. That version allows me to put usernames no
>longer than 8 characters. Now with the new versions of FreeBSD I can have as
>many as you need.
>
>I saw the "Make your own World" upgrading tutorial and I got scared. My
>server is the au
-- [ From: FreeBSD Questions * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE. That version allows me to put usernames no
longer than 8 characters. Now with the new versions of FreeBSD I can have as
many as you need.
I saw the "Make your own World" upgrading tutorial and I got scared.
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <36d4b092.8b076...@partitur.se> Palle Girgensohn writes:
> : I've seen three crashes in the last couple of weeks, with a server
> : box that's been running stable as a rock for two years, at least. It
> : has an adaptec 2940UW with six disks, and an adaptec 1542CP
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 05:41:02PM +0800, Eric wrote:
> Hi All:)
> Sorry , I don't know much about cable modem technology.
> So I was wondering if there's any support(or plan)
> for cable modems? since I have already got a network
> adapter is there anything necessary for ca
Julian Elischer wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, John Polstra wrote:
>
>[...]
>>
>> Here, you did the union mount on top of an existing mount point (da1).
>> I don't know for sure, but I suspect that this is the only case in
>> which union mounts are designed to work.
>
>I was led to believe (last ti
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:27:52 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> It was somehow distressing, though, that the new code had the exact
> same bug as the old, even though it was quite different code.
When you say "the new code", are you referring to the newer acd driver
as opposed to the older wcd
Hi All:)
Sorry , I don't know much about cable modem technology.
So I was wondering if there's any support(or plan)
for cable modems? since I have already got a network
adapter is there anything necessary for cable modem?
Best Rgards ,
You should to add in yours KERNEL config file line:
device ed0
and then recompile, reinstall kernel.
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Chan Yiu Wah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently found that my pci network card didn't work for me any more. It
> was recognized by the system but I could config it. This didn'
24 matches
Mail list logo
