Hi,
the change in src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h (in struct __mcontext),
where "struct trapframe mc_tf;" was replaced by it's members
broke doscmd.
(The relevant files are
$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h,v 1.3 1999/10/07 12:40:34 marcel Exp $
$FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/doscmd/signal.c,v
In reply:
>What will be the best way to create an email acc. only ?
> without have to create a shell acc. ? Like virtual table or
> something like that ?
>
> Any Idea ?
>
> Thank You.
disable all but pop in /etc/inetd.conf then `killall -1 inetd`
set all use shells t
It seems Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> It looks like both nsio and sio have PCCARD support disabled at the
> moment. Is there any other way I can get the system to recognize my
> modem?
Fix the broken sio, it might be KNF and all but it doesn't work...
-Soren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
> :Hi again,
> :
> : Whoops: a few hours after downgrading to 3.1-STABLE I had a double fault
> :error (strange, it didn't look like a normal panic screen, just the
> :message and the content of three registers, then the syncing disks
> :message). It seems that I might be wrong about hardware not
Get Out Of Debt Now!
ARE YOU DROWNING IN DEBT?
ARE YOU RECEIVING HARASSING PHONE CALLS?
Let our staff help you to eliminate your debts.
WITH OUR PROGRAMS YOU WILL*:
* Pay off all unsecured debt in 18-30 months
* Cut your current debt payments by up to 50%
* Cut Credit Card Bala
On 08-Oct-99 Hector Colmenares wrote:
>What will be the best way to create an email acc. only ?
> without have to create a shell acc. ? Like virtual table or
> something like that ?
Use cyrus IMAPD (which does POP3 too).
Its in the ports collection.
---
Daniel O'Connor software and n
What will be the best way to create an email acc. only ?
without have to create a shell acc. ? Like virtual table or
something like that ?
Any Idea ?
Thank You.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that I was finally able to upgrade to
4.0-current from 3.2-release. I cvsuped the 4.0 code, i compiled the 4.0
config command, i compiled the 4.0 kernel, installed the kernel, rebooted,
and build and installed the world and it worked. Then i just made my cust
It looks like both nsio and sio have PCCARD support disabled at the
moment. Is there any other way I can get the system to recognize my
modem?
--
Justin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> On 08-Oct-99 Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Yes.. That should work fine..
> > > In fact you can have all your FS's as modules except what / is..
> > You can have / too, as long as you load it with the loader. 8)
>
> And providing / is UFS because thats all the loader understands (?)
No, it could
On 08-Oct-99 Mike Smith wrote:
> > Yes.. That should work fine..
> > In fact you can have all your FS's as modules except what / is..
> You can have / too, as long as you load it with the loader. 8)
And providing / is UFS because thats all the loader understands (?)
---
Daniel O'Connor softwa
>
> On 07-Oct-99 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Just to confirm, *technically*, I should just have to comment out the
> > options PROCFS in my kernel config, rebuild and reboot and since procfs
> > isn't in the kernel, it will look for it as a module?
>
> Yes.. That should work fine..
> In fact
On 07-Oct-99 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Just to confirm, *technically*, I should just have to comment out the
> options PROCFS in my kernel config, rebuild and reboot and since procfs
> isn't in the kernel, it will look for it as a module?
Yes.. That should work fine..
In fact you can have al
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:56:27PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm getting this with a recent current (6. october):
> > >
> > > (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25.
> > > (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen Data P
On 1999-Oct-08 08:13:12 +1000, David O'Brien wrote:
>> >mount(8):
>> > syncAll I/O to the file system should be done synchronously.
>>
>> How detailed should the man page be? If it stated "all file data will
>> be written synchronously, but inodes where the only update is atime
>> and f
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting this with a recent current (6. october):
> >
> > (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25.
> > (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0. NumSGs = 1.
>
> Someone is telling us to transmit d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm getting this with a recent current (6. october):
>
> (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25.
> (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0. NumSGs = 1.
Someone is telling us to transmit data, but has not
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> su-2.03# /usr/local/sbin/postfix reload
> postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is not running
>
> I Know the mail system IS running on Postfix though:
> su-2.03# ps -aux | egrep postfix
> postfix 205 0.0 0.7 928 612 ?? I 5:01PM
> It was my understanding that it was standard recommended practice
> practice pretty much across the board to create the following
> separate filesystems:
>
> /
> /tmp (perhaps an mfs, perhaps softupdates, or whatever)
> /usr
> /var
> > There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having
>
> An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is 1800M. I have
> no use for /var and /usr and find them simply stupid in today's world.
> (except for ISP's where there is cause for a septerate /var).
>
> Lets sti
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> The scripts I am having problems with are:
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc5des.sh
> /usr/local/etc/postfix/postfix-script
>
> Both of these scripts still are as they were installed by their respective
> ports. And I know both have worked just fine for months
> >mount(8):
> > syncAll I/O to the file system should be done synchronously.
>
> How detailed should the man page be? If it stated "all file data will
> be written synchronously, but inodes where the only update is atime
> and free block bitmaps are written asynchronously", would that
> There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having
An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is 1800M. I have
no use for /var and /usr and find them simply stupid in today's world.
(except for ISP's where there is cause for a septerate /var).
Lets stick to facts.
The sound card is:
...
unknown0: <4232> on isa0
pcm0: at port
0x534-0x537,0x388-0x38b,0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on
isa0
unknown1: at port 0x200-0x207 on isa0
unknown2: at port 0x330-0x331 irq 9 on isa0
...
Everything looks fine but in my case the CS4232 is a
buggy and it can't work in duplex
Hello all
I have just committed Nick Sayer's SRA'ed telnet; this means that
if you have the secure dist, and maybe Kerberos, you will have a
telnet that attempts to do some encryption apart from the Kerberos
stuff.
Initial reports are that this encryption is weak, but it may be
better than nothi
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 07-Oct-99 Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Well, the standard way to load a kld is with kldload(1) or kldload(2).
> > I don't know if procfs works properly like this, though.
>
> Well I would assume (aha) that when mount cannot find procfs in the list of
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > Figuring one of the things a friend of mine raves about Linux for is their
> > kld's, I'd start playing with ours...
> >
> > Looking in /modules, I saw 'procfs', so, cool, a place to start...remove
> > "options PROCF
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Figuring one of the things a friend of mine raves about Linux for is their
> kld's, I'd start playing with ours...
[ Going off on a slight tangent ... ]
You may have gone beyond this, but a good introduction to klds is
an article called, "Atta
>
> One thing that is possible is that it's a very deep callstack... It's
> during probing and it may have called completion on a completing command
> while down at the bottom of the stack starting another command. If you run
> out of kernel stack, don't you get some other kind of fault?
That ki
This just started happening over the last day... It's blowing up during
probing because the frame pointer is getting nuked... this is a 2xPPro
machine.
The code in question is:
static u_int64_t
isp_get_portname(isp, loopid, nodename)
struct ispsoftc *isp;
int loopid;
int
> The network ones, for instance. No more need to put in the device lines
> in the kernel configuration file, it will be automagically loaded by
> ifconfig. I don't know if this is working already or not, though.
It works in -CURRENT for most PCI network devices (`de' is one notable
exception).
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I completely forget: CVSup should work as before. The
> workaround is not needed anymore. Thanks for your patience,
Thanks for healing my problem child, Marcel. It's kind of, er,
sensitive ... just like me. :-
:Hi again,
:
: Whoops: a few hours after downgrading to 3.1-STABLE I had a double fault
:error (strange, it didn't look like a normal panic screen, just the
:message and the content of three registers, then the syncing disks
:message). It seems that I might be wrong about hardware not being the
:p
Hi,
Before I completely forget: CVSup should work as before. The workaround
is not needed anymore. Thanks for your patience,
--
Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/
The FreeBSD projectmailto
Hi again,
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> hi again,
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> > : The problem is that the machine is completely locked, I can't get into
> > :the debugger with CTR-ALT-ESC; no panics so there are no coredumps
> > :catched. Any advise ? Coul
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 17:09:16 +0200, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> Is there anybody here that happens to know why these previously perfectly
> working shell-scripts all of a sudden are broken now ?
You'll greatly increase the chances of getting a useful answer if you
show us _how_ they're breaking. :
Hi,
I have for a while now (couple of weeks now I think) noticed that certain
shell scripts all of a sudden don't work any longer (even though they did
just fine earlier) ... the only thing that actually changed has been more
recent updates of FreeBSD-current.
The scripts I am having problems wi
Maybe the best solution is the following:
- leave "sync" with its current behaviour
- create a sysctl to make it truely synchronous (I was thinking of a new
mount option but thats overkill) and have the documentation for that
sysctl state the performance hit and recommend that the filesystem be
m
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 03:00:52 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> checked the kld man page, and nothing in there appears to be
> appropriate...
You should have checked the SEE ALSO secion of the manpage (I wonder
whether Ruslan Ermilov is reading?) *grin*
SEE ALSO
kldfind(2), kldfirstmod(2
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Figuring one of the things a friend of mine raves about Linux for is their
> kld's, I'd start playing with ours...
>
> Looking in /modules, I saw 'procfs', so, cool, a place to start...remove
> "options PROCFS" from kernel config, rebuild, install and reboot ...
>
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
