No Subject

2001-07-16 Thread Louis Kowolowski
subscribe freebsd-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

more on supermicro 6010H hang

2001-07-16 Thread Dave Cornejo
I have isolated the point at which current no longer runs as Jan 31 - Feb 1 of this year. Prior version work fine, in Feb & Mar I get either "Kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled" or I think the same thing with trap 26 (really not sure on that one). Next I took a brand new current from this ev

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:00:55 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:16:12AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > > > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in > > > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional > >

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:41:18 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The vinum patch hilights the problem that the new "libreadline" (just > a symlink to libedit) exposes new symbols which may conflict with an > existing program. I'm not sure how to deal with this. Can of worms opened, as I warn yo

Re: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > I've seen this panic many times on my alpha SMP testbox. It seems that the vm > > > object returned by vm_map_lookup via the fs.first_object variable is actually > > > NULL, resulting

Re: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > I've seen this panic many times on my alpha SMP testbox. It seems that the vm > > object returned by vm_map_lookup via the fs.first_object variable is actually > > NULL, resulting in a NULL pointer deref when calling vm_object_pip

Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio

2001-07-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:54:53PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > Yelling at people won't solve the problem, nor will trying to hold the > project to ransom. These are things that you need to take into > consideration. You can take over Gcc and Binutils maintenance at any time. I doubt you or any k

Re: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:39:17PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > I've seen this panic many times on my alpha SMP testbox. It seems that the vm > > > > object returned by vm_map

RE: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread Matthew Jacob
> I've seen this panic many times on my alpha SMP testbox. It seems that the vm > object returned by vm_map_lookup via the fs.first_object variable is actually > NULL, resulting in a NULL pointer deref when calling vm_object_pip_add() (note > object=0x0). I haven't seen this on UP or x86 before,

Save Up To 70% On Music For Your Business!

2001-07-16 Thread customerservice
Title: Welcome If you cannot read this eMail, please go tohttp://www.nwd42.com/s.asp?N=Zwm8Yq3701v~HNHEBLEDGOYJCHGDFHJhO Welcome ! FINALLY, AFFORDABLE MUSIC FOR YOUR BUSINESS!   Some things just make sense. Like playing music in your business th

Re: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > tf_eip = -1070822146, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, > > tf_esp = -1069680480, tf_ss = 1}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:405 > >#11 0xc02c8cfe in vm_object_pip_add (object=0x0, i=1) > > I've seen this panic many times on my alpha SM

RE: netstat kernel panic

2001-07-16 Thread John Baldwin
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x3a > fault code= supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02c8cfe > stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd6d1d44 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd6d1d5c > code segment = base 0

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Fetch the following file and unpack it in /usr/src; it will overwrite > the contents of lib/libedit. You should also disable libreadline in > gnu/lib/Makefile (and might want to remove /usr/include/readline/* to > make sure it pick

ncurses: 4.x -> 5.x buildworld failure + patch

2001-07-16 Thread John Polstra
While upgrading an old (October 2000) -current system which did not have a libc.so.5 yet, I ran into this failure in src/lib/ncurses: cc -o make_keys -nostdinc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev56 -mcpu=ev56 -I. -I/c/src/lib/libncurses -I/c/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncur ses/ncurses -I/c/src/lib/libncurses

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:16:12AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in > > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional > > code duplication. > > I don't, particularly since the two programs wh

Re: cannot print to remote printer

2001-07-16 Thread Terry Lambert
Garrett Wollman wrote: > > I'm not sure about POSIX, but the manpage of nohup does not mention > > SIGCHLD. The only signals I see mentioned in revision 1.8 of nohup.1 > > are SIGHUP and SIGQUIT. > > That is correct. SIGCHLD is entirely irrelevant to `nohup', as the > slightest amount of effort

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional > code duplication. I don't, particularly since the two programs which use it are already GNU software, so you haven't actually bought any additio

Re: ATA disks problem in -CURRENT

2001-07-16 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Samuel Tardieu wrote: > With recent -CURRENT kernels (including one from yesterday), I get > random strange behaviours as far as my ATA disk is concerned: > > - the disk light stays on; > - I can read from the disk but cannot write anything to it (sync > blocks, writes from vi bl

ATA disks problem in -CURRENT

2001-07-16 Thread Samuel Tardieu
With recent -CURRENT kernels (including one from yesterday), I get random strange behaviours as far as my ATA disk is concerned: - the disk light stays on; - I can read from the disk but cannot write anything to it (sync blocks, writes from vi block, ...); - suspending then resuming the

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:33:00PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > It doesn't actually impliment all of libreadline - just it's most > > common uses. Last time I checked libedit couldn't emulate readline's > > callback mode. I looked at implimenting the callback stuff, but it > > would be rea

Re: kernel with SSE is unstable

2001-07-16 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In my system kernel(WITH SSE) falls when I use commands netstat and swapinfo. > > kernel without SSE works fine. > > I got a very similar panic when trying an UP kernel with SSE enabled. > > mi_switch() sets curproc->p_oncpu to NOCPU before calli

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:33:51 +0100, David Malone wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD, > > which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly it > > can function as a d

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:33:51AM +0100, David Malone wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD, > > which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly it > > can function as a

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > for GNU libreadline (unfortunately it's not binary compatible with our > present libedit). I've tested this so far with bc and gdb and it ..or source compatible, apparently. I thought I'd tested this with the ftp client, but I mu

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread David Malone
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD, > which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly it > can function as a drop-in (apparently binary compatible) replacement > for GNU libreadlin

libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
Hi all, I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD, which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly it can function as a drop-in (apparently binary compatible) replacement for GNU libreadline (unfortunately it's not binary compatible with our present li