It occured to me to day to look at several KSE threads running under
ktrace..
Talk about confusing..
The key to understanding it is that the lines
RET fork 0
are actually the upcalls when a thread blocks, and they will report to
the userland scheduler all the RETs that occured since the
I went through the FlexeLint output of the LINT kernel on i386 and
tried to examine all warnings about memoryleaks in central or
semi-central code.
I this patch I belive addresses the ones I think I could confirm,
in the following files:
cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c
cam/scsi/scsi_da.c
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:17:54PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 10:25, Wesley Morgan wrote:
Does this bug effect -stable? It only showed up in -current recently.
Isn't it a bigger chance that something on the FreeBSD side made this bug
much more visible?
On Sun, 29
if i can help, please let me know!
all im doing is:
newfs /dev/ad0s2a
mount /dev/ad0s2a /mnt-root
rsh dev -n dump 0f - /c/4 | restore rf -
and after a short while it panics.
with today's cvsup, and with this 'fix':
*** vfs_subr.c 2002/09/29 08:16:40 1.1
---
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Last call:
Unless somebody with access to this hardware and willing to maintain
these drivers step forward Real Soon Now, I intend to retire them
from -current before 5.0-R.
Poul-Henning
--- Forwarded Message
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 06:49:20
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Unless somebody with access to this hardware and willing to maintain
these drivers step forward Real Soon Now, I intend to retire them
from -current before 5.0-R.
For a possible maintainer for the mcd driver i have at least
Hi!
While local package initilization I get a panic. World and kernel from today.
This I found in messages:
Sep 30 15:49:55 leeloo kernel: panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
Sep 30 15:49:55 leeloo kernel:
Sep 30 15:49:55 leeloo kernel: syncing disks... panic: bremfree: bp 0xd381a080 not
Hi,
Index: sys/i386/i386/machdep.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.532
diff -u -r1.532 machdep.c
--- sys/i386/i386/machdep.c 7 Sep 2002 19:12:42 - 1.532
+++
On 29-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 29 at 12:25, Mitsuru IWASAKI spoke:
If you think this is caused by acpi.ko, just disable acpi.ko loading.
Please read thru loader(8) and device.hints(5).
Yes, this is it. I've now disabled acpi and the boot process comes
further.
vga0:
Hello,
I've installed DP1 from CD. It doesn't like the Promise ATA100 TX2.
`boot -c' just behaves exactly like normal boot and stops in the
debugger.
Thus I thought I could install via FTP. But what will I get?
Will I get a `current' current?
Or will I get DP1 from April again?
-Hanspeter
To
On Sep 30 at 11:59, John Baldwin spoke:
These messages above that you left out are very important. :(
Also, if you can get a trace by typing 't' at the db prompt
that can be very helpful as well.
Ok. I hope there aren't to many mistakes.
vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I went through the FlexeLint output of the LINT kernel on i386 and
tried to examine all warnings about memoryleaks in central or
semi-central code.
I this patch I belive addresses the ones I think I could confirm,
in the following files:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
fails to work.
There is one known issue on sparc64 which is being worked: On sparc64
nexus_dmamap_create() calls
On 30-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 30 at 11:59, John Baldwin spoke:
These messages above that you left out are very important. :(
Also, if you can get a trace by typing 't' at the db prompt
that can be very helpful as well.
Ok. I hope there aren't to many mistakes.
vga0:
On Sep 30 at 15:16, John Baldwin spoke:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernal mode
fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0de
This means someone is trying to access memory that has been free'd.
How do I make someone not to do such bad things? :-)
Hmm, unfortunately generic_bcopy() is in
On Sep 30 at 19:40, Hanspeter Roth spoke:
Thus I thought I could install via FTP. But what will I get?
Will I get a `current' current?
Or will I get DP1 from April again?
I've interrupted after /bin has been downloaded. And what do I see?
mnt/bin # ll
total 7810
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
fails to work.
What are the exact steps you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David O'Brien writes:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me
On 30-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 30 at 15:16, John Baldwin spoke:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernal mode
fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0de
This means someone is trying to access memory that has been free'd.
How do I make someone not to do such bad things? :-)
Any problems that one runs into, or things that go boom, or questions should
be directed to me. I've been running almost the exact same stuff under
OpenBSD and FreeBSD (with the notable exception that some things were unworking
in OpenBSD due to relied-upon breakage) both -current and -stable
On Sep 30 at 15:16, John Baldwin spoke:
Hmm, unfortunately generic_bcopy() is in asm, and so it doesn't have
a true frame and we end up skipping over the frame in execve()
where it is called from. There are only 3 bcopy's in execve(), but
I'm not sure which is likely to have been the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:45:39PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 30 at 19:40, Hanspeter Roth spoke:
Thus I thought I could install via FTP. But what will I get?
Will I get a `current' current?
Or will I get DP1 from April again?
I've interrupted after /bin has been downloaded.
At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
was changed/enlarged.
Someone other than I (Bruce?) should vet this. It should
solve the libc_r binary compatibility problem, but it may
not fix everything. Applications that copy
On 30-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 30 at 15:16, John Baldwin spoke:
Hmm, unfortunately generic_bcopy() is in asm, and so it doesn't have
a true frame and we end up skipping over the frame in execve()
where it is called from. There are only 3 bcopy's in execve(), but
I'm not
On Sep 30 at 14:16, Kris Kennaway spoke:
release bits, or you can just download new installation media from the
desired snapshot (this is the preferred option) and use that to
install with.
I can only see /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20020302-PREVIEW.
Is there a more recent snapshot?
On Sep 30 at 17:19, John Baldwin spoke:
On 30-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
416 and 556 denote linenumbers in kern_exec.c.
Thanks! That's here:
if (ps_arg_cache_limit = i + sizeof(struct pargs)) {
bcopy(imgp-stringbase, newargs-ar_args, i);
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Daniel Eischen wrote:
At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
was changed/enlarged.
- ret = set_fpcontext(td, ucp-uc_mcontext);
- if (ret != 0)
- return (ret);
+
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ]
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
What limits are the on the number of signals that are stored?
It's a TailQ.
Surely
* De: Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ]
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ]
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:26:50PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
On Sep 30 at 14:16, Kris Kennaway spoke:
release bits, or you can just download new installation media from the
desired snapshot (this is the preferred option) and use that to
install with.
I can only see
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/dell/imp/p4/newcard/src/lib/libkvm -c
/dell/imp/p4/newcard/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c -o kvm_proc.o
/dell/imp/p4/newcard/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c: In function `kvm_proclist':
/dell/imp/p4/newcard/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c:201: structure has no member
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c -o kvm_proc.o
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c: In function `kvm_proclist':
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c:201: structure has no member named `p_siglist'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
Teh same that provides specification for queued signals - posix rts.
hey that's MY typo... get your own! :-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c -o kvm_proc.o
: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c: In function `kvm_proclist':
: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c:201:
* De: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c -o
Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
:
Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
This has been fixed. But there's other breakages in the kernel that
are being worked on.
And now fixed. All we have to look out for now is someone doing
* De: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
walt [EMAIL
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takahashi Yoshihiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it
I was talking to someone about lightweight interrupt threads
and interactions with KSEs and specifically about
KSE borrowing..
Believe it or not, I can't remember who it was..
if it was you, let me know :-)
Julian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Dunno who it was, but my understanding is that we already actually use
lightweight interrupt threads on sparc64, so you might want to peruse
there and look at the approach taken. :-) You might have been talking to
Bosko (possibly at USENIX ATC), as he was maintaining an i386 lightweight
* De: Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: World broken at libkvm ]
On 30 Sep, Peter Wemm wrote:
Juli Mallett wrote:
And now fixed. All we have to look out for now is someone doing something
that exposes some sort of functional difference, but I don't
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:46:50AM -0400,
Robert Watson said words to the effect of;
Dunno who it was, but my understanding is that we already actually use
lightweight interrupt threads on sparc64, so you might want to peruse
there and look at the approach taken. :-) You
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
46 matches
Mail list logo
