On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > looking at the code in src/sys/i386/i386/dump_machdep.c,
> > > >
> > > > we see:
> > > > 78 dumplo = di->mediaoffset +
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 09:14:06PM -0800, Jimi Thompson wrote:
>
>
> This is an issue that we recently ran into at work and I wanted to mention
> this since 5.0 isn't released yet. I don't know if FreeBSD has addressed
> this or not but thought it should be mentioned just in case. We've
> dis
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 09:14:06PM -0800, Jimi Thompson wrote:
>
>
> This is an issue that we recently ran into at work and I wanted to mention
> this since 5.0 isn't released yet. I don't know if FreeBSD has addressed
> this or not but thought it should be mentioned just in case. We've
> dis
This is an issue that we recently ran into at work and I wanted to mention
this since 5.0 isn't released yet. I don't know if FreeBSD has addressed
this or not but thought it should be mentioned just in case. We've
discovered that in many *nix OS's the TCP stack sets the default TTL for
packe
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > I fixed a port like this recently. _ANSI_SOURCE was actually added by
> > the port, not the application vendor, in that case.
>
> Wait a minute, I think this might be the same port. Is it gnu-finger?
> If so, try the attached patch. Kris was going t
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > looking at the code in src/sys/i386/i386/dump_machdep.c,
> > >
> > > we see:
> > > 78 dumplo = di->mediaoffset + di->mediasize - Maxmem *
> > > (off_t)PAGE_SIZE;
> > >
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > > > > It's always been there. the question is
> > > > > "Who has br
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> > looking at the code in src/sys/i386/i386/dump_machdep.c,
> >
> > we see:
> > 78 dumplo = di->mediaoffset + di->mediasize - Maxmem *
> > (off_t)PAGE_SIZE;
> > 79 dumplo -= sizeof kdh * 2;
> > 80
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > > > It's always been there. the question is
> > > > "Who has broken it?"
> >
> > I think this is a 5.0 showstopper. Ha
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
> > Hmm, which of these defines claims posix src? -D_ANSI_SOURCE ?
> >
> > cc -O -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro -I./../include
> [...]
> >
> >> u_int is undocumented and unportable, so it probably shouldn't be
> >> used. I
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > cc -O -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro -I./../include
> > -I./.. -DDIRENT=1 -DDIRENT=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1
> > -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_ST_RDEV=1 -DHAVE_TM_ZONE=1
> > -DHAVE_LONG_FILE_
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What's the proper way to get a typedef for u_int? Is there a doc
> > > somewhere on what we expect in terms of #defines for 3rd party application
> > > authors?
> >
Hi,
I am working at home with three OS. Windows 2000, Linux (ASPLinux)
and FreeBSD.
I use aspldr (some times lilo) as a boot loader. A week ago I installed
FreeBSD 5.0 DP2
and when I tried to boot W2K I saw that can't. I tried to reinstall W2K
but when I try
to boot I see the same problem.
Hmm, which of these defines claims posix src? -D_ANSI_SOURCE ?
cc -O -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro -I./../include
[...]
u_int is undocumented and unportable, so it probably shouldn't be
used. It's only 3 characters shorter than `unsigned' anyway.
It's for ports.
And this is
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's the proper way to get a typedef for u_int? Is there a doc
> > somewhere on what we expect in terms of #defines for 3rd party application
> > authors?
>
> will give you a typedef, provided you aren't wr
I just posted a hack that should stop this from happenning
how does it look? (I haven't tested it.).
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I've also bumped into this problem, when after upgrading memory I
> didn't increase swap size, so that after a panic the system
> overwrote disklabel.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > > It's always been there. the question is
> > > "Who has broken it?"
>
> I think this is a 5.0 showstopper. Having 5.0 overwrite your
> Wind
I've also bumped into this problem, when after upgrading memory I
didn't increase swap size, so that after a panic the system
overwrote disklabel. Fortunately, my root partition was placed
after swap, not before it, so that recreating disklaber revived
the system.
-Maxim
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 1
Actually, I then did that, and thats when it _actually_ pooched the disk
-Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Nate Lawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Craig Reyenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 15:39
Subject: Re: Major disk problem
> On Thu
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > It's always been there. the question is
> > "Who has broken it?"
I think this is a 5.0 showstopper. Having 5.0 overwrite your
Windows partition would be "poor" PR.
Having a quick look at it, it sho
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Craig Reyenga wrote:
> I cvsup'ed today (dec 12, about 5pm est) from DP2, and it went all fine and
> dandy until I went to boot into it, when it said that /usr had a bad
> superblock. I then went on to fsck -y it, and it says that _every_ file is
> an "unknown type" and goes on
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > It's always been there. the question is
> > "Who has broken it?"
>
> I think it has just slowly bitrotted. I opened a PR on this in
> November.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/45
In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> It's always been there. the question is
> "Who has broken it?"
I think it has just slowly bitrotted. I opened a PR on this in
November.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/45777
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:10 -0800 (PST)
> > > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > ad0s2 needs to be as big as main memory or dumps may overwrite the next
> > > partition.
> >
> > Actuall
Looks like a bug in Geom.. Apparently it uses signed numbers :-)
(also a bug in the kernel becasue the dump should have refused)
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Thanks for pointing out the obvious! (Although I am confused by why it
> > wiped the root partition which
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:10 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old
> > > la
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:10 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ad0s2 needs to be as big as main memory or dumps may overwrite the next
> > partition.
>
> Actually, a bit bigger. But that doesn't matter as I made it 160 M
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> (kgdb) frame 2
> #2 0xc0140ffc in cam_periph_getccb (periph=0xc41fc080, priority=1)
> at /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c:748
> 748 /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c: No such file or directory.
> in /usr/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c
> (kgdb) prin
< said:
> Thanks for pointing out the obvious! (Although I am confused by why it
> wiped the root partition which is BEFORE swap.)
Because it starts at the end of the specified partition and works its
way backwards. (The hope is to preserve as much of the existing swap
as possible, under the ass
> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:22:10 -0800 (PST)
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old
> > laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E). The installation worked pretty w
Hello
I have a Thinkpad T23 and to get current to be stable I had to
upgrade the the bios. Might help you also.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old
> laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E). The installation worked pretty
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old
> laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E). The installation worked pretty well, but
> the system crashes frequently when acpi is running.
>
> I decided to get a dump to look at and added the follow
< said:
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sem_open&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=SunOS+5.7&format=html
BZZT!
Appeal to irrelevant authority.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021213 09:39] wrote:
> Alfred,
>
> There is a very interesting thread on freebsd-current about
> some of the POSIX semaphore code that you contributed to
> -current.
>
> You may want to chime in. :)
>
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mailindex.cgi?sort=subject
For the past few days I have been trying to get RC1 running on my old
laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E). The installation worked pretty well, but
the system crashes frequently when acpi is running.
I decided to get a dump to look at and added the following to my
rc.conf:
dumpdev="/dev/ad0s2b"
dumpdir="/s
Mike Barcroft wrote:
Sounds like a bug to me. Could you open a PR?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46239
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Terry Lambert wrote:
Get me the exact file you are concerned about, and I will stare
at it with you. I think, though, that if there is a problem, it's
just that you are catching things in mid-implementation (POSIX
semaphores were supported in the other scope, but not system,
until very recently;
< said:
> So apart from the leading slash character, nothing is mentioned about
> embedded slashes in the semaphore name. What's the right behavior
> for FreeBSD then?
The reason why the standard is written that way was to allow for
RTOS implementations which do not have a filesystem. A quality
Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I realize this, but it seems that from my cursory inspection of
> uipc_sem.c that the check for embedded '/' characters is unnecessary and
> much too restrictive according to the posix standard. The standard only
> talks about whether or not the sem
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> >>I have been looking at the implementation of POSIX semaphores in
> >>-CURRENT. I noticed that there are several missing pieces, specifically
> >>the man pages and the removal of uthread_sem.c from libc_r.
[ ... ]
> I am not interested in threading. Named POSIX semaphores a
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:41:16AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> >>portabliity issue as TRU64 (at least) allows arbitrary pathnames as
> >>sempahores, probably storing some sort of marker in the directories (I
> >>get this only from examining the TRU64 online manual pages at
>
>>>http://www.tru64unix
Garrett Wollman wrote:
< said:
So, is there some mechanism I am missing? Is there a layer between the
application calling sem_open and the kernel receiving the parameters
that strips it down to the last component? If there is a higher level
involved here, why is the low-level ksem_create f
--On 01 December 2002 10:26 +0100 Marc Recht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I'm seeing this lately:
acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "pcm channel"
1st pcm0:record:0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:191
2nd pcm0:play:0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:191
please test the patc
< said:
> So, is there some mechanism I am missing? Is there a layer between the
> application calling sem_open and the kernel receiving the parameters
> that strips it down to the last component? If there is a higher level
> involved here, why is the low-level ksem_create function worrying a
Terry Lambert wrote:
Joe Kelsey wrote:
I have been looking at the implementation of POSIX semaphores in
-CURRENT. I noticed that there are several missing pieces, specifically
the man pages and the removal of uthread_sem.c from libc_r.
I suppose the man pages are not critical, but it seems sil
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 15:53, CHOI Junho wrote:
> > % ssh -2 -N -f -L 9595:remote-host:25 remote-host
> > bind: Can't assign requested address
> >
> > I usually use it to forward SMTP to remote host. Is there any change to
> > system or openssh upgrade? Before upgradi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:24:42AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:25:42 -0800
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/modlogan-0.8.1.log
> > >
> > > In the case of modlogan it may be a bug in the configure s
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> I have been looking at the implementation of POSIX semaphores in
> -CURRENT. I noticed that there are several missing pieces, specifically
> the man pages and the removal of uthread_sem.c from libc_r.
>
> I suppose the man pages are not critical, but it seems silly to keep
> u
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Ugh. Since it may call kmem_malloc(), UMA must hold Giant.
>
> This is the same problem the mbuf system has, and its what's
> keeping network device drivers under Giant in 5.0.
>
> Both subsytems should probably have GIANT_REQUIRED at all entry
> points so as to catch loc
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 17:09:42 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> :
> : * Integer types `unsigned short' and `unsigned char' promote to
> : `unsigned int'.
>
> With -traditional, the code I quoted still produces -1.
Probably because of machine-specific overflow handling or printf
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:41:06PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 14:32:40 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Pardon my ignorance here, but the following fragment
> > returns -1, doesn't it?
> >
> > #include
> > void
> > main(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> >
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 14:32:40 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance here, but the following fragment
> returns -1, doesn't it?
>
> #include
> void
> main(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> i = (unsigned char)1 - (unsigned char)2;
> printf("%d\n", i);
> }
It very depe
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:26:54PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Since both operands are unsigned, result can't be negative, but supposed
> to be. Here is the fix:
>
> --- b.c.bak Fri Dec 13 14:54:12 2002
> +++ b.c Fri Dec 13 15:20:15 2002
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
> s[0][0] = a;
>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:38:11PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:13:49PM
Since both operands are unsigned, result can't be negative, but supposed
to be. Here is the fix:
--- b.c.bak Fri Dec 13 14:54:12 2002
+++ b.c Fri Dec 13 15:20:15 2002
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
s[0][0] = a;
s[1][0] = b;
if ((r = strcoll(s[0], s[1])) == 0)
- r = (
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:27:07PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If you're an ohci user can you please test this patch out for inclusion
> > in 5.0. I need to know that it doesn't break anything - the reports are
> > that it fixes
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:25:42 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/modlogan-0.8.1.log
> >
> > In the case of modlogan it may be a bug in the configure script (I
> > haven't looked at it). I'm not aware of a runtime dependency, so a q
Juli Mallett wrote:
> Has anyone else seen something like this with CVS?
>
> %%%=20
> (jmallett@luna:~/Work/Mono)59% mcvs rlog mono > mono-cvs-log; mcvs rlog mcs=
> > mcs-cvs-log
> cvs rlog: Logging mono
> cvs [rlog aborted]: received abort signal
> cvs: lock.c:177: lock_name: Assertion `(__exten
59 matches
Mail list logo
