Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > Odd: > > %%% > # cat /etc/sleep_dhclient > #!/bin/sh > > omshell > /dev/null << EOF > connect > new control > open > set state = 3 > update > close > EOF > # cat /etc/wakeup_dhclient > #!/bin/sh > > omshell > /dev/null << EOF > connect > new control > open > set state = 4 > update > close >

Re: strange umass/scsi behaviour

2003-07-29 Thread John Hay
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:28:18PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, John Hay wrote: > > Does anyone have an idea why the umass/scsi code behave differently > > between if you boot with a device already plugged in as opposed to > > plugging it in later? In my case it is a Sandisk Cru

Re: strange umass/scsi behaviour

2003-07-29 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, John Hay wrote: > Does anyone have an idea why the umass/scsi code behave differently > between if you boot with a device already plugged in as opposed to > plugging it in later? In my case it is a Sandisk Cruiser. If I plug > it in before booting, it works just great, but if I

strange umass/scsi behaviour

2003-07-29 Thread John Hay
Hi, Does anyone have an idea why the umass/scsi code behave differently between if you boot with a device already plugged in as opposed to plugging it in later? In my case it is a Sandisk Cruiser. If I plug it in before booting, it works just great, but if I plug it in later, it does not want to w

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Terry Lambert
Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and > > > add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, > > > and then just act on them. > > > > Instead of just adding the stuff to devd? > > Cur

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Terry Lambert
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and > > add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, > > and then just act on them. > > Instead of just adding the stuff to devd? The entire dhcpd code? Isn't that

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-07-29 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-30 04:00:05 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-07-30 04:00:05 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-30 04:02:05 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : Hi Folks, : : I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient. : : Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are: : "control" and "interface". The later is not inplemented at all. :

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: : : > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and : > > add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, : > > and then just

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to > > zero USED as it should. > > It looks like z->uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in > zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the > z->uz_full_buck

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:23:21AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to > > zero USED as it should. > > It looks like z->uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in > zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not takin

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Tor . Egge
> The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to > zero USED as it should. It looks like z->uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the z->uz_full_bucket list into account). The enclosed patch recalculates t

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > "control" does only release leases and exit (state 2), I never managed > to make dhclient sleep (state 3) and wake up (state 2). Odd: %%% # cat /etc/sleep_dhclient #!/bin/sh omshell > /dev/null << EOF connect new control open set state = 3 update close

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:09:18AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > >[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative > >impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data, > >in particular on non

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Folks, I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient. Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are: "control" and "interface". The later is not inplemented at all. It pretends to work, but if you look at the source there are stubs only :P. "control" does only rele

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs andprocfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
Below is my current patch to devfs and jail to support the mounting of devfs and procfs in jails. This patch also allows a jail to specify what devfs rule to apply to the jail. As well as defining a default jail devfs rule in /etc/rc.d/devfs. Scot Index: etc/defaults/rc.conf ===

Re: -current 'make release' status? [SOLVED]

2003-07-29 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > ... > > > Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only > > > applies to the userland. > > > > > > Still, running "mak

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative >impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data, >in particular on non-i386 SMP machines] I just committed a workaround for this problem, until Jef

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs andprocfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Mike Makonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > > >jail, and apply them to the devfs m

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and > > add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, > > and then just act on them. > > Instead of just adding the stuff to devd? Currently, devd is in the business o

HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data, in particular on non-i386 SMP machines] Thanks to Lukas Ertl and Bosko we have found a clear indication that UMA is in fact not reentrant (enough). The indica

Re: -current 'make release' status? [SOLVED]

2003-07-29 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 29), Ruslan Ermilov said: > Hm, I always thought that -O2 and -Os are just useful aliases that in > effect only turn a few dozens of -f optimization flags, and that > switching some of them off later is allowed. I.e., "-Os > -fno-strict-aliasing" should work. That does wo

Re: -current 'make release' status? [SOLVED]

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > ... > > Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only > > applies to the userland. > > > > Still, running "make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR=" gets the > > release done

Re: -current 'make release' status? [SOLVED]

2003-07-29 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ... > Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only > applies to the userland. > > Still, running "make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR=" gets the > release done. > > I wondered why I get it, and similarly my nigthly "buildkernel" > compl

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-29 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-29 18:34:24 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Terry Lambert wrote: Martin Blapp wrote: I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only be used with one interface, but several. On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface gets added, an

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the

Re: Palm syncing over USB on FreeBSD, any hopes?

2003-07-29 Thread Rajappa Iyer
Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 29 July 2003 19:24, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > > ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 > > ucom0: init failed, STALLED > > device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6 > > Try this: http://www.lphp.org/popups/articleswindow

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Some of those events already exist for routing sockets, so in a worst case > > scenario, you can hook up a routing socket to a kqueue :-). > > > > Martin -- you might want to try the "route monitor" command sometime and > > take a look at the vent st

Re: Palm syncing over USB on FreeBSD, any hopes?

2003-07-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 19:24, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 > ucom0: init failed, STALLED > device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6 Try this: http://www.lphp.org/popups/articleswindow.php?id=13

Palm syncing over USB on FreeBSD, any hopes?

2003-07-29 Thread Rajappa Iyer
[ I sent this message to pilot-link-devel and coldsync-users. I'm trying in freebsd-current and freebsd-hardware to see if I have better luck. -rsi ] So I've tried everything I could to sync my Sony Clie SJ10 (PalmOS 4.0) with FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE and 5-CURRENT including setting up ppp over u

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-07-29 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-29 16:00:04 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-07-29 16:00:04 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-29 16:03:25 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote: > > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > >jail, and apply them to the devfs m

Re: HEADSUP: USB da(4) quirks deprecated

2003-07-29 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > You may have a device (USB camera, pen drive, hard drive, ...) that begins > > to get errors like ... "Synchronize cache failed, status 0x35". > > If the Sync cache fails with a "reasonable error code", then the code > that silence these errors shoul

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote: I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly, because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process wants t

5.1-RELEASE hardware detect problem - install stalls

2003-07-29 Thread Joe Sotham
I am attempting to install 5.1-RELEASE. The following items appear in the log file. This section is repeated ~15 times, and then the install procedure moves on to the "...probing devices ..." screen and never moves on from there (of course, never is the limit if my patience ... 30 minutes). I a

Re: HEADSUP: USB da(4) quirks deprecated

2003-07-29 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
> You may have a device (USB camera, pen drive, hard drive, ...) that begins > to get errors like ... "Synchronize cache failed, status 0x35". If the Sync cache fails with a "reasonable error code", then the code that silence these errors should be enhanced rather than have a quirk entry added.

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote: > I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the > jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly, > because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process > wants to mount it. > > Going this way a

[PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi all, hi Clement, I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly, because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process wants to mount it. Going this way allows us to control which jail could

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Terry Lambert
Robert Watson wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > If there are other ideas, I'm open to them. > > > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and add a > > kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, and then just > > act on them. > > Some of those events already exist for r

Re: linksys wireless usb adapter

2003-07-29 Thread Olivier Cortes
Someone said few weeks ago that USB-wifi is not supported at all under FreeBSD for now. Olivier Le Lun 28/07/2003 à 17:01, Paulo Roberto a écrit : > Is there any on going work for this usb network interface? > > thanks > > Paulo > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo!

Re: -current 'make release' status? [SOLVED]

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:41:54AM -0400, John De Boskey wrote: > - Ruslan Ermilov's Original Message - > > > > > > No, I have nothing in my environment that should affect the > > > build, no /etc/make.conf in the chroot area.. > > > > > But then again: running "make rerelease" is effecti

Re: Highly loaded machine getting slower and slower

2003-07-29 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lukas Ertl writes: > >Hi there, > > > >I'm having again problems with a highly loaded 5.1-current machine. The > >box is a 2.4GHz Dual Xeon (HTT enabled) with 1GB RAM and acts as a news > >server/feeder running diablo

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Martin Blapp wrote: > > I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only > > be used with one interface, but several. > > > > On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets > > initialized and the GW gets set as us

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2 Op

Re: rcng: additional argument to run_rc_command

2003-07-29 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:13:51PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: > is it possible to give an extra argument to an $extra_commands > command? the usual call to run_rc_command > > run_rc_command "$1" > > suggests otherwise, as $1 already is the name of the command to > be executed (start, stop, etc).

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > > > -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Ruslan Ermilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 14:06 > > An: Kai Mosebach > > Cc: David Leimbach; Michael Reifenberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re:

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:01:36PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > can access dhclient (or dhcpd) on the local machine without authentification. > > > > You can get omshell working without auth over tcp/ip - I managed this > > today when playing. But a unix domain socket would be nicer because

AW: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Kai Mosebach
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Ruslan Ermilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 14:06 > An: Kai Mosebach > Cc: David Leimbach; Michael Reifenberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: new.h is missing > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: [...] > I was wondering, that in 4.x there is a folder /usr/include/g++ > where all the stuff is found, and on 5.1-CURRENT its in > /usr/include/c++/3.3, where im not sure, whether g++ uses this path > automatically ? > /usr/libexec/cc1

Re: -current 'make release' status?

2003-07-29 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:30:54AM -0400, John wrote: > Hi, > >I'm currently down to this patch to allow a make release to complete > for -current: > [...] Try setting the KERNEL_FLAGS=-DNO_WERROR instead. >without it, the following causes BOOTMFS to abort: > > cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -W

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > > can access dhclient (or dhcpd) on the local machine without authentification. > > You can get omshell working without auth over tcp/ip - I managed this > today when playing. But a unix domain socket would be nicer because the > dhclient server binds to INADDR_ANY by default. Cool. Do

AW: AW: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Kai Mosebach
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: David Leimbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 13:57 > An: Kai Mosebach > Cc: 'Michael Reifenberger'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: new.h is missing > > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 5:51AM, Kai Mosebach wrote: >

Re: AW: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread David Leimbach
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 5:51AM, Kai Mosebach wrote: Tried that too, but wasnt working either. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/sapdb/src/FreeBSD/sys/src/SAPDB] # locate new|grep include /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/new.h /usr/include/c++/3.3/new /usr/include/c++/3.3/new ought to be it. did you try

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:56:48AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only > be used with one interface, but several. Yay! This bites me badly on my laptop with a permanent fxp0 and a sometimes-present wi0. > On a well known OS this work

rcng: additional argument to run_rc_command

2003-07-29 Thread Tobias Roth
is it possible to give an extra argument to an $extra_commands command? the usual call to run_rc_command run_rc_command "$1" suggests otherwise, as $1 already is the name of the command to be executed (start, stop, etc). would this be possible/a good idea to implement? thx, t.

AW: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Kai Mosebach
Tried that too, but wasnt working either. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/sapdb/src/FreeBSD/sys/src/SAPDB] # locate new|grep include /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/new.h /usr/include/c++/3.3/new is that sufficient for g++ to find ? regards Kai > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Michael Reifenberg

-current 'make release' status?

2003-07-29 Thread John
Hi, I'm currently down to this patch to allow a make release to complete for -current: === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.801 diff -u -r1.801 Makefile --- Makefile26 Jul 2003 06:47:40 -

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Kai Mosebach wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:54:25 +0200 > From: Kai Mosebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: new.h is missing > > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03) > > im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get > > Tool

Re: new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:54, Kai Mosebach wrote: > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03) > > im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get > > Tools_List.hpp:51:17: new.h: No such file or directory > > Leading to lots of errors afterwards i.e. : > > void* operator new(unsi

new.h is missing

2003-07-29 Thread Kai Mosebach
Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03) im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get Tools_List.hpp:51:17: new.h: No such file or directory Leading to lots of errors afterwards i.e. : void* operator new(unsigned int, SAPDBMem_IRawAllocator&) RTEMem_Allocator.cpp:124: no mat

Re: device driver memory leak in 5.1-20030726?

2003-07-29 Thread Gary Jennejohn
John-Mark Gurney writes: > Gary Jennejohn wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:58 +0200: > > It appears to me that the test in usb_block_allocmem() should be > > (p->tag->parent == tag || p->tag->parent == tag->parent) and NOT > > p->tag == tag! That's because bus_dma_tag_create() uses the

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Terry Lambert
Martin Blapp wrote: > I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only > be used with one interface, but several. > > On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets > initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface > gets added, and the fir

STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only be used with one interface, but several. On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface gets added, and the first one is still active

Re: fixed another leak in USB code

2003-07-29 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ok, those of you coming with panics due to kmem exhaustion w/ USB, I > have fixed another leak. For some reason I assumed that big blocks > were being deallocated upon free, not being put back on the freelist. > (Have I mentioned how much it sucks th

Re: LOR with filedesc structure and Giant

2003-07-29 Thread Terry Lambert
Robert Watson wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this: > > I've bumped into some similar problems -- it's a property of how we > current lock select(). We hold the file descriptor lock for the duration > of polling