I don't think I've seen this one before (i386, kernel built Sep 17).
Is it already fixed?
Kris
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vm page queue mutex @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3630
first acquired @
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 02:53, Bernd Walter wrote:
With a driver for the hardware it's possible of course.
You have a VT82C686A/B chip for which you want viapm driver.
intpm is for Intel PIIX4 (82371AB, 82443MX) which you don't have.
I've replaced intpm with viapm in my kernel config and this is
It seems Jan Stocker wrote:
I've updates my -current system from Sep, 14th to todays -current (2
hours old). Now i cant boot further than detecting cdrom drives. After
testing my second cdrom (cdrw) for its UDMA capabilities the kernel
hangs in an endless loop. The output is a repeat from two
Newest world/kernel same prob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mkdir x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cd x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch b-first; sleep 60
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch c-second; sleep 60
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch a-third
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # ls -l -c
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 jstocker
It seems Jan Stocker wrote:
That seems right :)
I've updates my -current system from Sep, 14th to todays -current (2
hours old). Now i cant boot further than detecting cdrom drives. After
testing my second cdrom (cdrw) for its UDMA capabilities the kernel
hangs in an endless loop. The
cvsup this morning 5th oct 12.05 PM
I get the following error during buildkernel
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I.
After yesterday's cvsup and kernel/world build my primary slave harddisk
not longer gets detected (once again).
If I revert to src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c 1.11 it is detected
properly. (It might also work with later versions. If you need the exact
revision where it stopped working please tell
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Jan Stocker wrote:
Newest world/kernel same prob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mkdir x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cd x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch b-first; sleep 60
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch c-second; sleep 60
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch a-third
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x #
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
cvsup this morning 5th oct 12.05 PM
Specify timezone please - I committed a fix for this a few hours ago.
BMS
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 05 October 2003 12.37, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
cvsup this morning 5th oct 12.05 PM
Specify timezone please - I committed a fix for this a few hours ago.
CET as in Central European Time, I
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 12:11, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Jan Stocker wrote:
Newest world/kernel same prob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mkdir x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cd x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch b-first; sleep 60
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x # touch c-second; sleep 60
[EMAIL
A sparc64 kernel without pci device fails to build. The kernel is
configured for Ultra2 with no pci devices.
--- v --- log --- v ---
daiba% make
cc -c -O -pipe -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
Hi,
just got this panic on my smp box. Sources are from October 2nd, around
9pm CEST. A dump is available for further debugging.
I'm seeing this on one of my systems as well that I just recently updated
(Oct 4th). Mine
Hello
I am unable to start X with a current as of today 08.00 CEST, it crashes to
the debugger with a fatal trap 12, I poked around to see if anything useful
was in the logs but I could not find anything, can you please advice what
log I could send to aid in hunting down this problem?
I do not
With today's -CURRENT:
Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt.
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
/boot/kernel/acpi.ko text=0x3abd4 data=0x16f8+0xe68 syms=[0x4+0x5c10+0x4+0x7a31]
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980,
With today's CURRENT:
...
GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc2a3a380
ad0: 38166MB ST340016A [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
acd0: DVDROM _NEC DV-5700B at ata1-master UDMA33
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Loading configuration files.
Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point.
Reseed
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE
I got the following lines in my /etc/fstab :
/dev/ad1s1 /mnt/dmsdos rw -m 775,user
/dev/ad0s2 /mnt/emsdos rw, -m 775,user
And everytime i reboot(dual system) it stops when doing a fsck.
fsck: exec /usr/sbin/fsck_msdos for /dev/ad1s1: No such file or
directory
On 2003.10.05 18:20:45 +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE
I got the following lines in my /etc/fstab :
/dev/ad1s1 /mnt/dmsdos rw -m 775,user
/dev/ad0s2 /mnt/emsdos rw, -m 775,user
I think it should be msdosfs on -CURRENT.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:20:45PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
/dev/ad1s1 /mnt/dmsdos rw -m 775,user
/dev/ad0s2 /mnt/emsdos rw, -m 775,user
^
This should be msdosfs.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
In the past, msdosfs has taken its permissions from the mountpoint.
Recently I noticed that this still works for files in the root directory
but subdirectories are all chmod 000. Has anyone else seen this? Adding
the -m=755 flag for instance does work for the files in the top of the
mountpoint
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:56:53PM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote:
Hello
I am unable to start X with a current as of today 08.00 CEST, it crashes to
the debugger with a fatal trap 12, I poked around to see if anything useful
was in the logs but I could not find anything, can you please advice what
Hello,
Does anybody know about $subj PCI wirelerss card. I read mail-archive and
found that this card does not equal dwl-520 which has prism2.5 chipset and
works well with wi driver. $subj was not supported few months ago, so what's
now?
If it's not supported, I'm afraid there's no any 22mbps
Hello,
Does anybody know about $subj PCI wirelerss card. I read mail-archive and
found that this card does not equal dwl-520 which has prism2.5 chipset and
works well with wi driver. $subj was not supported few months ago, so what's
now?
If it's not supported, I'm afraid there's no any 22mbps
I get the following erros on boot.
11:41pm mdouhan @ [dragonfruit] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD dragonfruit.fruitsalad.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Sun Oct
5 23:21:41 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
sys/DRAGONFRUIT i386
11:44pm mdouhan @ [dragonfruit] ~
--
Matt
Hello
I get the following error msgs on the following system
11:53pm mdouhan @ [dragonfruit] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD dragonfruit.fruitsalad.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Sun Oct
5 23:21:41 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
sys/DRAGONFRUIT i386
11:54pm mdouhan @
I have a fuji digital camera which has always previously worked with
-current no problems. However I have not tried to copy images from it
for a couple of months now.
I tried today with a -current world of:
FreeBSD heather.xtaz.co.uk 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sun Sep
28 20:12:26 BST
At 12:31 AM +0400 2003/10/06, tokza wrote:
If it's not supported, I'm afraid there's no any 22mbps card supported by
freebsd.
So far as I know, there are no open-source drivers for any 22mpbs
card anywhere. A friend of mine does Linux driver development, in
particular for wireless
On Monday 06 October 2003 02:11, Brad Knowles wrote:
So far as I know, there are no open-source drivers for any 22mpbs
card anywhere.
Hm, what does 22 mbps mean? As I know, DWL-520+ is a 802.11b-standart based
card and the max speed is 11mbps as mentioned in this standart. Reading card
This should resolve the problem starting X.
- Forwarded message from Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: [EMAIL
Le 2003-10-04, Jan Stocker écrivait :
are printed so fast i cant really read but it must be something
like that:
acd1: WARNING - REQUEST_UDMA (error request)
acd1: WARNING - INQUIRE_SENSE (retrying request)
Little can be said without complete and accurate error messages,
Le 2003-10-05, Jan Stocker écrivait :
/usr/local/bin/cdrecord: Permission denied. Cannot send SCSI cmd via ioctl
Check perms on your /dev nodes.
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Le 2003-10-05, Jan Stocker écrivait :
it's an atapicam problem...
That we do not know so far. Recent problems reported by ATAPI/CAM users
were mostly ATA and CAM bugs. Please do not make such hasty statements
until a complete analysis of the problem has been made.
Thanks,
Thomas.
--
At 2:49 AM +0400 2003/10/06, tokza wrote:
So far as I know, there are no open-source drivers for any 22mpbs
card anywhere.
Hm, what does 22 mbps mean? As I know, DWL-520+ is a 802.11b-standart based
card and the max speed is 11mbps as mentioned in this standart.
In this case, there is
That wireless card has Texas Instrument chipset and doesn't work on
freebsd, I have got a driver for linux but is very dodgy.
I wont recomend you use this wireless card.
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:49 AM +0400 2003/10/06, tokza wrote:
So far as I know, there are no open-source drivers for
None of the previous posts on this seem to describe exactly what I'm
seeing:
5.1-REL always detects the secondary drive.
5.1-CUR never detects the secondary.
5.1-CUR + ata-lowlevel 1.11 detects it the FIRST time it's booted
immediately after 5.1-REL. Always. On subsequent boots, no luck.
A =
On Monday 06 October 2003 03:26, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
That wireless card has Texas Instrument chipset and doesn't work on
freebsd, I have got a driver for linux but is very dodgy.
I wont recomend you use this wireless card.
The only reason to talk about this card is it's name, very
Last week, I did a bit of experimentation to look at privilege issues in
the allocation of ptys on FreeBSD. Right now, to safely allocate a
pty/tty pair, you basically need privilege (otherwise you can't
chown/chmod the slave node). I took a look at some of the approaches used
by other systems
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Tancsa writes:
However, overall the CPU is lower when running with the hifn
card defined in the kernel. It makes a large difference in CPU usage when
scp'ing a file across using 3des. Perhaps when the new Soekris card which
does AES comes out, these numbers
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ken McKittrick wrote:
I've got 5.1-current running on an IBM BladeCenter HS20. This thing has
a USB KVM built-in. It's working in multi-user mode. Problem is when I
boot to single user, can't do anything.
Check that atkbd is using flags 0x1. That should cause atkbd not to
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Matt Douhan wrote:
Oct 5 23:40:58 dragonfruit kernel: ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution
failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._BST] (Node 0xc47d
d980), AE_AML_REGION_LIMIT
Oct 5 23:40:58 dragonfruit kernel: ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution
failed
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Matt wrote:
I have a fuji digital camera which has always previously worked with
-current no problems. However I have not tried to copy images from it
for a couple of months now.
[...]
Oct 5 23:02:58 heather kernel: umass0: Fuji Photo Film USB Mass
Storage, rev
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:31:33PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't think I've seen this one before (i386, kernel built Sep 17).
Is it already fixed?
No, not yet.
Regards,
Alan
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vm page queue mutex @
42 matches
Mail list logo
