I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade
NOT looking at it..
boy we really need to go through there with a broom.. the cobwebs are
getting thick.
Like we always call the code to put an upcall, even though we don't
have upcalls any more,
and we always create an trap
On 4/5/11 1:35 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
is there anyone here with enough gdb/kgdb source experience to know what
we would need to put on the stac
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>
>>> is there anyone here with enough gdb/kgdb source experience to know what
>>> we would need to put on the stack at fork_exit() to make i
On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
is there anyone here with enough gdb/kgdb source experience to know
what
we would need to put on the stack at fork_exit() to make it stop
when it
gets there?
not only is it annoying but it slows down d
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:08:16 -0700 Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> FC> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just committed a fix for a problem that might look like a deadlock.
> >> With trociny@ patch and my la
on 05/04/2011 15:55 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2011 14:50:43 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I believe that newbus already supports ordering of children on a bus.
>>
>> BTW, does USB have to pass anything from probe to attach?
>
> Mostly only the driver info field. To
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 14:50:43 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I believe that newbus already supports ordering of children on a bus.
>
> BTW, does USB have to pass anything from probe to attach?
Mostly only the driver info field. To avoid duplicate lookups.
> Duplicate lookup is of course not very n
on 05/04/2011 14:21 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2011 13:06:22 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 03/04/2011 13:46 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> Mostly out of curiosity (but not only because of that) I wonder why the
>>> use_generic flag and two probing passes are nee
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:08:16 -0700 Freddie Cash wrote:
FC> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
wrote:
>>
>> I just committed a fix for a problem that might look like a deadlock.
>> With trociny@ patch and my last fix (to GEOM GATE and hastd) do you
>> still have any issues?
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 13:06:22 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 03/04/2011 13:46 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > Mostly out of curiosity (but not only because of that) I wonder why the
> > use_generic flag and two probing passes are needed in USB driver probing
> > code. That is, why the standard a
on 03/04/2011 13:46 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> Mostly out of curiosity (but not only because of that) I wonder why the
> use_generic flag and two probing passes are needed in USB driver probing code.
> That is, why the standard approach of using different probing return values
> (e.g. BU
11 matches
Mail list logo
