Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/07/2011 00:48 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: on 11/07/2011 23:33 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_ patch *before* it is checked in, as

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 11/07/2011 19:16 Steve Kargl said the following: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:07:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: But it's not clear which of the processes are slaves and which is master. It's also not clear why the master takes so much CPU (on par with the slaves) - from my reading of its

Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Kohji Okuno
Hello, I think that devfs has a problem. I encountered the problem that open(/dev/AAA) returned ENOENT. Of course, /dev/AAA exists. ENOENT was created by the point(***) in devfs_allocv(). I think that the race condition had occurred between process A and vnlru kernel thread. Please check the

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: Seems this interface be acceptable ? Looks good to me. The proposed code changes are in the attached patch. Proposed wording of addition into RFORK(2): Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it. I added the

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Petr Salinger
Seems this interface be acceptable ? Looks good to me. The proposed code changes are in the attached patch. Proposed wording of addition into RFORK(2): DESCRIPTION: RFTSIGZMB If set, the kernel will return selected signal number instead of SIGCHILD upon thread exit

Re: Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:10:28PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: Hello, I think that devfs has a problem. I encountered the problem that open(/dev/AAA) returned ENOENT. Of course, /dev/AAA exists. ENOENT was created by the point(***) in devfs_allocv(). I think that the race condition had

Re: Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Kohji Okuno
Hello, From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Bug about devfs? Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:19:25 +0300 Message-ID: 20110712111925.gh43...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua Thank you for the report. The proposed change would revert r179247, which also caused some issues. Are you able

Re: Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/7/12 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:10:28PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: Hello, I think that devfs has a problem. I encountered the problem that open(/dev/AAA) returned ENOENT. Of course, /dev/AAA exists. ENOENT was created by the point(***) in

Re: Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:02:44PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/7/12 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:10:28PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: Hello, I think that devfs has a problem. I encountered the problem that open(/dev/AAA) returned ENOENT. Of course,

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Petr Salinger
Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it. I applied it against our 8.2 based package, altered our clone to use this new interface and run eglibc testsuite. No regression. Our runtime detection of this new interface will be based on sysctl kern.osreldate. some rewording to

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ali Mashtizadeh mashtiza...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe someone can setup something like reviewboard [1] for developers to use. This may also help folks who want to keep abreast of the current work in

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Matt
Sic... If you allow me the comparison, FreeBSD development is as open as are the US (and, to some extend, most western country) borders nowadays open to aliens, and believe me, this is not a compliment. - Arnaud ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 07/12/11 20:10, Matt wrote: Sic... If you allow me the comparison, FreeBSD development is as open as are the US (and, to some extend, most western country) borders nowadays open to aliens, and believe me, this is not a compliment. - Arnaud I like the comment, although I disagree. In

Re: cardbus panic: end address is not aligned

2011-07-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, July 11, 2011 9:29:19 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 07/08/2011 06:19, John Baldwin wrote: Hmm, well that's odd. It didn't grow it enough it seems. Also, can you boot your machine, then do 'sysctl debug.bootverbose=1', insert the card and record the messages in dmesg when it

Re: Intel GPU kernel driver

2011-07-12 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Jun 30, 2011 9:24 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: [Please remove current@ when replying.] I created the first code drop for the ongoing GEM/KMS project. Please note that this is not an end-user release, and even _not_ a call for testing. The project is not finished yet, and

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it. I applied it against our 8.2 based package, altered our clone to use this new interface and run eglibc testsuite. No regression. Our runtime detection of this new

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Robert Millan
2011/7/12 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: I just committed this to HEAD. Will MFC in a week, unless some problems arise. Thanks! I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much reason to bump on HEAD right now. Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD.

pmcstat(8) and machdep.hlt_cpus

2011-07-12 Thread Pan Tsu
pmcstat(8) stopped to work for me after largeSMP landed in r222813. At the time only pmccontrol(8) was updated. Then the next day machdep.hlt_cpus was ripped out. So, I've assumed it's going to be fixed by subsequent commits and commented out related code locally. $ qemu -smp 2 -nographic ...

Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds

2011-07-12 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (11/07/2011 16:36), m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ali Mashtizadeh mashtiza...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe someone can setup something like reviewboard [1] for developers to use. This may also help folks who want to keep abreast of the current work in a particular

Re: pmcstat(8) and machdep.hlt_cpus

2011-07-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/07/2011 00:27 Pan Tsu said the following: pmcstat(8) stopped to work for me after largeSMP landed in r222813. At the time only pmccontrol(8) was updated. Then the next day machdep.hlt_cpus was ripped out. So, I've assumed it's going to be fixed by subsequent commits and commented out

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Petr Salinger
I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much reason to bump on HEAD right now. Many thanks. Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will need to keep our backward-compatibility patch anyway, and when the bump happens on stable/8 our sysctl

Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork()

2011-07-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much reason to bump on HEAD right now. Many thanks. Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will need to keep our backward-compatibility

Re: AX88772A AX88772B chipset differences?

2011-07-12 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:19:14AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:44:48PM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote: I have card based on AX88772B. I tried patch axe driver for vendor and device IDs. card detected, set up link, but no data received. What else need for patch in

Re: cardbus panic: end address is not aligned

2011-07-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/12/2011 07:22, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 11, 2011 9:29:19 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 07/08/2011 06:19, John Baldwin wrote: Hmm, well that's odd. It didn't grow it enough it seems. Also, can you boot your machine, then do 'sysctl debug.bootverbose=1', insert the card and

Re: Bug about devfs?

2011-07-12 Thread Kohji Okuno
Hello, From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:57:53 +0300 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:02:44PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/7/12 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:10:28PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: Hello, I think that devfs has a