[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 06:16:10 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 06:16:10 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-07 06:16:10 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 06:16:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 06:16:15 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 06:15:48 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 06:15:48 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-08-07 06:15:48 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 06:15:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 06:15:54 - /usr/bin/c

Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images

2011-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:37:38 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:02:49 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). I have already fil

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:09 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:10 - /usr/bin/c

ghost files

2011-08-06 Thread deeptec...@gmail.com
as of recent times, some git rebase operations fail unexpectedly with an error: "cannot create .git/index.lock: file exists". an investigation session was something like the following: $ ls -l .git the index.lock file is not in the shown list. $ ls -l .git/index.lock the file is listed! it's a regu

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 05:40:06 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 03:43:37 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 03:43:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-07 03:43:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:43:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:43:51 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:20 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 03:16:04 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 03:16:04 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-07 03:16:04 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:16:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:16:10 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 03:15:53 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 03:15:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-08-07 03:15:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:15:58 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 03:15:58 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:09 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:06 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 02:40:07 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 00:44:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 00:44:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-07 00:44:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:44:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:44:14 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:17 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:17 - /usr/bin

amusing reboot message with -current

2011-08-06 Thread Matthew Jacob
db> reboot cpu_reset: Restarting BSP cpu_reset: Restarting BSP cpu_reset_proxy: Stopped CPU 2 cpu_reset_proxy: Stopped CPU 2 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send an

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:15 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:15 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:19 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-07 00:16:04 - /usr/bin/c

Re: missing perl module (p5-Sys-Filesystem) for amd64

2011-08-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, David Boyd wrote: > This appears to be a problem only in 9.0-current and 9.0-beta1. > > The perl module p5-Sys-Filesystem appears in i386 but not in amd64. > > It is part of our automated installation. > > Thanks in advance for any information you can provide, for a

Re: Recursive nullfs mounts and r224655

2011-08-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 08:11:32PM -0400, b. f. wrote: > On 8/6/11, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:44:25AM -0400, b. f. wrote: > >> Recent changes to the kernel (sys/kern/vfs_mount.c, in r224655?) > >> between r224550 and r224655 have broken my tinderbox setup. It had a > >

missing perl module (p5-Sys-Filesystem) for amd64

2011-08-06 Thread David Boyd
This appears to be a problem only in 9.0-current and 9.0-beta1. The perl module p5-Sys-Filesystem appears in i386 but not in amd64. It is part of our automated installation. Thanks in advance for any information you can provide, for assisting with the proper resolution of this problem or for sim

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/06/2011 07:52, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> This is, to some extent, a deliberate design decision. The idea is that >> if you are installing onto an existing partition with the right type, >> then you really do just want to use it without ne

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:07 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:06 - /usr/bin/c

Re: Recursive nullfs mounts and r224655

2011-08-06 Thread b. f.
On 8/6/11, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:44:25AM -0400, b. f. wrote: >> Recent changes to the kernel (sys/kern/vfs_mount.c, in r224655?) >> between r224550 and r224655 have broken my tinderbox setup. It had a >> tmpfs filesystem mounted at /T and a UFS filesystem mounted at

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:05 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 23:40:05 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: [clang] (gpt)zfsboot is broken: zfs_alloc()/zfs_free() mismatch

2011-08-06 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-08-05 07:08, Test Rat wrote: Pawel Worach writes: ... A workaround for the hang on boot and "error 1 lba X" failures is the following patch, it would be interesting if it also makes the zfs_alloc/free error go away too. After applying the patch zfsboot and gptzfsboot boot successfully

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 21:34:21 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 21:34:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-06 21:34:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:34:43 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:34:43 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:48 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:48 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 21:12:18 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 21:12:18 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-06 21:12:18 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:12:34 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:12:34 - /usr

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/06/2011 07:52, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > This is, to some extent, a deliberate design decision. The idea is that > if you are installing onto an existing partition with the right type, > then you really do just want to use it without newfs. Actually, if I am reinstalling I really do want to

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 21:06:37 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 21:06:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-08-06 21:06:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:06:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 21:06:46 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:48 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:48 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:40 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-08-06 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-06 20:30:32 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images

2011-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:02:49 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). I have already filed a PR at NetBSD (bin/45217): http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/06/11 12:18, Garrett Wollman wrote: In article<4e3d55fd.7090...@freebsd.org>, nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes: I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. Whenever you add a / partition on a partitioning scheme that requires a boot partition (APM, GPT on some platforms), the installer as

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article <4e3d55fd.7090...@freebsd.org>, nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes: >I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. Whenever you add a / >partition on a partitioning scheme that requires a boot partition (APM, >GPT on some platforms), the installer asks you if you want to add a boot >part

Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images

2011-08-06 Thread Martin Matuska
The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). I have already filed a PR at NetBSD (bin/45217): http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=45217 The volume_set_id doesn't h

Re: 9.0-BETA1 installer issues

2011-08-06 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 06/08/2011 15:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >

Re: ahci(4) breaks on MSI X58 Pro-E

2011-08-06 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ed. You wrote 6 августа 2011 г., 13:27:20: > It should be noted that the ahci(4) driver made the system hang on > timeouts, whereas the ata(4) driver already observed timeouts during > startup and disabled the channel entirely. This allowed me to properly > boot with a single disk. Same pr

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/05/11 20:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am generally happy with it. The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was so used to the old behavior, but it reall

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/05/11 17:35, Kevin Oberman wrote: I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am generally happy with it. The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was so used to the old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would not want to see the old

Re: 9.0-BETA1 installer issues

2011-08-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote: I've been trying out 9

Re: graid fresh install

2011-08-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/05/11 11:01, Mike Tancsa wrote: I netbooted 9.0 Beta and was going to try and install the system onto a raid1 mirror built with graid. However, neither sysinstall nor bsdinstall see it fully I have the box netbooted (Intel Matrix raid) Could you test the patch at http://people.freebsd

Re: Recursive nullfs mounts and r224655

2011-08-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:44:25AM -0400, b. f. wrote: > Recent changes to the kernel (sys/kern/vfs_mount.c, in r224655?) > between r224550 and r224655 have broken my tinderbox setup. It had a > tmpfs filesystem mounted at /T and a UFS filesystem mounted at /U, > and, when setting up the tinderbox

Re: svn commit: r224659 - head/etc

2011-08-06 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/05/2011 23:07, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Doug, > > * Doug Barton , 20110806 02:07: >> However, I would much rather see us actually change the default >> file. Users who are going to enable nis will already know that thi

Re: ahci(4) breaks on MSI X58 Pro-E

2011-08-06 Thread Ed Schouten
* Ed Schouten , 20110805 20:53: > The day before yesterday I upgraded a server of mine at Hetzner to > FreeBSD 9. It seems to use an MSI X58 Pro-E motherboard, having an ICH10 > SATA-controller. > > It seems that under high load, I get timeouts on the SATA controller. It > seems disabling MSI has

Recursive nullfs mounts and r224655

2011-08-06 Thread b. f.
Recent changes to the kernel (sys/kern/vfs_mount.c, in r224655?) between r224550 and r224655 have broken my tinderbox setup. It had a tmpfs filesystem mounted at /T and a UFS filesystem mounted at /U, and, when setting up the tinderbox, performed: mkdir /U/u1 mkdir /U/u2 mkdir /T/t1 mount -t null

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-08-06 Thread b. f.
Peter Holm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt > > > > Ah, yes, this is an as