Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on old Core2Duo E4500 too

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Arnaud. > You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 1:19:29: > > > CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (2200.09-MHz K8-class > CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fd Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 13 > > Features=0xb

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 16/09/2011 00:19 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: > est0: on cpu0 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 616082506000825 > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 This is a far more common issue. The output implies that acpi_perf dri

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on old Core2Duo E4500 too

2011-09-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Arnaud. You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 1:19:29: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (2200.09-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fd Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 13 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe39d AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x

more thoughts on the (9.0beta2) installer

2011-09-15 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Dear all, I set up a scratch box earlier this week (to check that openafs still works on beta2, and soon, HEAD), and took advantage of the opportunity to play around with the installer a bit. First off, let me thank Nathan for putting in a huge pile of work to get things to where they are --

Queue drop not accounted ?

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, Shouldn't packet freed in IFQ_ENQUEUE() because the queue is full be accounted as dropped, cf attached patch ? Thanks, - Arnaud diff --git a/sys/net/if_var.h b/sys/net/if_var.h index 2dcb6f9..387f614 100644 --- a/sys/net/if_var.h +++ b/sys/net/if_var.h @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ do { \ A

Re: no X after installing xorg + xfce

2011-09-15 Thread Antonio Olivares
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear folks, > > I hope this is the correct list to post this message. > > I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit > machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg.  When I type > startx, I get a screen with

no X after installing xorg + xfce

2011-09-15 Thread Antonio Olivares
Dear folks, I hope this is the correct list to post this message. I have successfully installed FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2 to an amd64 bit machine, I have used the ports to install xfce and xorg. When I type startx, I get a screen with a bunch of colors no mouse, no keyboard, just colors. The machine ha

Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE mbuf corruption

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, [added -current@ to the CC list, as the issue is still present in 9.0-BETA2] On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf management for about two >> week

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > From today's -CURRENT: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >        The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > Fre

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:26 PM, K. Macy wrote: > I was just discussing this issues with some others - evidently est(9) > works fine on both older and newer cpus. I see you're active on lkml - > does the linux driver work correctly on this machine? i.e. do you know > that it isn't disabled in

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Xin LI
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, K. Macy wrote: [...] > sys/x86/cpufreq/est.c:1008 > >        /* Attempt to enable SpeedStep if not currently enabled. */ >        msr = rdmsr(MSR_MISC_ENABLE); >        if ((msr & MSR_SS_ENABLE) == 0) { >                wrmsr(MSR_MISC_ENABLE, msr | MSR_SS_ENABLE);

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

2011-09-15 Thread Tim Gustafson
> Can you connect an enclosure to the SAS 2008 chip card you have now > and test? I thought I had read about problems like yours with that > chip on FreeBSD when using such enclosures. The SAS 2008 chip we have is built in to the motherboard; it does not have any external connectors. -=-=-=-=-=-

FreeBSD and GPGPU on nVidia (OpenCL/CUDA): Pathscale and "open" compute driver

2011-09-15 Thread Hartmann, O.
Just read this on www.phoronix.com: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTkxMA Does it sound promising? It seems so. Even if this would be a commercial product which would fits into FreeBSD's gap of having GPU compute support, this could be an affordable solution.

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread K. Macy
I was just discussing this issues with some others - evidently est(9) works fine on both older and newer cpus. I see you're active on lkml - does the linux driver work correctly on this machine? i.e. do you know that it isn't disabled in the BIOS. Thanks On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Arnaud La

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:58:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: >> >> > Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer >> >>       http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread K. Macy
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 15/09/2011 19:20 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: >> est0: failed to enable SpeedStep >> p4tcc0: on cpu0 >> est1: failed to enable SpeedStep >> p4tcc1: on cpu1 >> est2: failed to enable SpeedStep >> p4tcc2: on cpu2 >> est3: failed to e

Re: 9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/09/2011 19:20 Arnaud Lacombe said the following: > est0: failed to enable SpeedStep > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > est1: failed to enable SpeedStep > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > est2: failed to enable SpeedStep > p4tcc2: on cpu2 > est3: failed to enable SpeedStep > p4tcc3: on cpu3 > est4: failed to enable Spe

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Gary Palmer
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:58:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/ ? It's a > little more annoying viewin

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > Is there a way of tracking suggested improvements to the new installer http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/ ? It's a little more annoying viewing changes in the ViewVC interface. There's also svn log though if you ha

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Gary Palmer
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:02:33AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >>> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300 > schrieb Alisson : > >> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? > > > Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two. > Unsurprisingly, to me at least. > > Personally,

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f, >>> and -i. There was no way to do this with sysi

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f, >> and -i. There was no way to do this with sysinstall > > The source appears to disagree with you > > From u

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300 schrieb Alisson : > Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two. Unsurprisingly, to me at least. Personally, I don't care. I don't plan with "future" releases anyway, only with the

9.0-BETA2 do not support SpeedStep on E5420

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, >From today's -CURRENT: Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-BETA

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote: Usually rather quite later than sooner. >>> >>> A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a >>> difference :-)

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote: >>> Usually rather quite later than sooner. >> >> A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a >> difference :-) > > I hate you. :) > > Ok. Some third person test/verify that t

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

2011-09-15 Thread Matt Thyer
On Sep 15, 2011 11:36 PM, "Tim Gustafson" wrote: > > > The SAS 2008 chip (SAS 6G) is the one that the FreeBSD mps driver has > > problems with when used with port expanders. It's the older SAS 3G chip > > that works OK with FreeBSD I think. > > I had crossed some wires earlier on in our discussion

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alisson wrote: > Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/schedule.html Remember that just because a date is in the schedule, doesn't make it a hard date. So I don't know, but sometime soon, when it is ready.

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Martin MATO
Le 15/09/2011 16:42, Alisson a écrit : > Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curr

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 15 September 2011 18:05, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Usually rather quite later than sooner. > > A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a > difference :-) I hate you. :) Ok. Some third person test/verify that this patch (a) does what it's supposed to do, and (b) is correct, a

Re: FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 09/15/2011 16:42, Alisson wrote: Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? When it is ready? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr

FreeBSD 9.0

2011-09-15 Thread Alisson
Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

couple of sched_ule issues

2011-09-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
This is more of a "just for the record" email. I think I've already stated the following observations, but I suspect that they drowned in the noise of a thread in which I mentioned them. 1. Incorrect topology is built for single-package SMP systems. That topology has two levels ("shared nothing"

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

2011-09-15 Thread Tim Gustafson
> The SAS 2008 chip (SAS 6G) is the one that the FreeBSD mps driver has > problems with when used with port expanders. It's the older SAS 3G chip > that works OK with FreeBSD I think. I had crossed some wires earlier on in our discussion. We do have a SAS 2008 chip in the system already, but it's

Re: changing a zfs pool to another machine

2011-09-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/09/2011 00:26 Alisson said the following: > Hi... > > I have a zfs pool with 3 harddrives (ad8,ad10,ad15) > > I need to change to another machine... > > when I try to boot freebsd in the another machine with this 3 harddrives... > goes to mountroot prompt. > > so.. I need to boot with >

9.0 bata2 & keymap

2011-09-15 Thread Fbsd8
Out of the 9 USA maps only "us.iso.acc.kbd" worked somewhat. The keyboard 9 key block above the arrow keys don't function. Issuing the "man cmd_name" command doe's display the man page, but the {Page up, Page down keys } don't work. Also when using the "ee" edit command the {delete, Page up, Page

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Gary Palmer
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Second, I frequently want custom newfs options, most notably -b, -f, > and -i. There was no way to do this with sysinstall The source appears to disagree with you >From usr.sbin/sysinstall/label.c /* If the user wants a special new

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Linimon
> Usually rather quite later than sooner. A perfect opportunity for src committers to dive in and make a difference :-) mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Kevin. You wrote 15 сентября 2011 г., 2:46:21: >>> 7. On the partition editor screen the option should be the >>> first in the list (ie; left most side) so if user accepts this config, >>> hitting enter moves to next menu screen instead of having to tab over >>> taking more time and effort

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/09/2011 12:16 Alexander Zagrebin said the following: >> Pester the maintainer? > > I've thought that if an opened PR exists, then it have to be > reviewed sooner or later... > Usually rather quite later than sooner. There are about 5000 non-ports PRs and there are only a few dozen active

RE: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Zagrebin
> Pester the maintainer? I've thought that if an opened PR exists, then it have to be reviewed sooner or later... -- Alexander Zagrebin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubsc

Re: svn commit: r225474 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/ia32 i386/i386 ia64/ia32 ia64/ia64 kern powerpc/aim powerpc/booke sparc64/sparc64 sys

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> [It seems that distribution list can be trimmed without any bad >> consequences] >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:50:51PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:05 AM,

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

2011-09-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Pester the maintainer? The maintainer is alumni. -Garrett ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr