On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:24:06PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01.11.2011 19:50, Dennis K?gel wrote:
Not sure if replying on-list or off-list makes more sense...
Replying on-list could share experience to other users.
Anyway, some
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes sense if
you are accessing single LUN.
In my tests where I have 24 LUNS that form 4 vdevs in a single zpool, the
highest performance was achieved
when I split the active paths among
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes sense
if you are accessing single LUN.
In my tests where I have 24 LUNS that form 4 vdevs in a single zpool, the
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes sense if
you are accessing single LUN.
In my tests where I have 24 LUNS that
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes
sense if you are
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 01/20/12 15:27, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 15:27, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it out
there so people can look at it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160818
Among other
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:02:42PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T New panic has been introduced somewhere between
T r229851 and r229932, that happens on shutdown if
T kernel has WITNESS and doesn't have WITNESS_SKIPSPIN.
I've run through binary search and panic was introduced
by r229854.
--
First step in debugging is to find out if the problem is SU+J
specific. To find out, turn off SU+J but leave SU. This change
is done by running:
umount filesystem
tunefs -j disable filesystem
mount filesystem
cd filesystem
On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it
out
there so people can look at it.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joel Dahl j...@vnode.se wrote:
On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:39:42 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Hi,
I recently noticed that multimedia/vlc generates a lot of disk IO when
playing media files. For instance, when playing a 320kbps mp3 gstat
reports about 1250kBps (=1kbps). That's quite a lot of overhead.
It turns out
Hello.
I still use the amd automounter, but I miss NFSv4 capabilities. Since
Linux seems to use a more deep in the kernel located facility, I'd like
to ask whether FreeBSd has an alternative to the amd automounter with
NFSv4 capabilities. Sorry if I bother someone, I'm not aware of an
alternative
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/lsi/mps_lsi.20120120.1.txt
I plan to check it in to head next week, and then MFC it into stable/9 a
week after that most likely.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here:
Just to clarify, this will replace the existing mps(4) driver in
FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:53:04 -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here:
Just to clarify, this
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:44 PM
Subject: LSI supported mps(4) driver available
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 23:14:20 -, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:44 PM
Subject: LSI supported mps(4) driver available
The
On 21/01/2012, at 7:14, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
In addition to supporting WarpDrive, the driver also supports Integrated
RAID.
Thanks to LSI for doing the work on this driver!
This is great news (the RAID support) - thanks very much.
Is there a corresponding userland tool, or plans for
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello.
I still use the amd automounter, but I miss NFSv4 capabilities. Since
Linux seems to use a more deep in the kernel located facility, I'd
like
to ask whether FreeBSd has an alternative to the amd automounter with
NFSv4 capabilities. Sorry if I bother someone, I'm not
--- On Wed, 2012/1/18, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, January 13, 2012 10:27:13 pm aconnoll...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Please try this patch:
Index: sys/dev/atkbdc/atkbdc_isa.c
===
--- atkbdc_isa.c(revision
24 matches
Mail list logo
