Re: x220 notes

On 03/13/12 17:43, matt wrote: On 03/12/12 17:00, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, matt wrote: On 03/08/12 01:28, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:29:16 +0200, Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios wrote Hi, 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on

Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...

Hm, try: make KERNBUILDDIR=/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERNNAME clean all install Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...

[patch] iwi(4) suspend/resume broken

Hi, I've noticed that iwi(4) doesn't have ieee80211_new_state(IEEE80211_S_INIT) in iwi_stop_locked() since 8.0-RELEASE (comparing with RELENG_7's). It seems that this prevent if_iwi from working properly after resuming, no data frames were sent. The patches is available at: http://people.freebsd

Re: x220 notes

On 03/12/12 17:00, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, matt wrote: On 03/08/12 01:28, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:29:16 +0200, Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios wrote Hi, 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on GNU/Linux, so I would assume it

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

On 3/13/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Super Bisquit > wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Garrett Cooper >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Garrett Cooper >>> wrote: >>> (Pe

Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...

On 13/03/2012 18:56, g...@freebsd.org wrote: At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:43:06 +0100, Gustau Pérez wrote: On 08/03/2012 22:20, George Neville-Neil wrote: Howdy, I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a patch against HEAD which I have now subjected to testing using t

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

>I found that setting performance_cpu_freq="HIGH" doesn't work on my >desktop system, I guess because devd never gets any AC adapter events >that trigger running the power_profile script. I enabled it manually by >adding these lines to my /etc/sysctl.conf: > > hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C2 > dev.cpu.

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:33:10 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:33:10 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 19:33:10 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:33:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:33:13 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:54 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:54 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:55 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:52 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:52 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:52 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:26:54 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:20:14 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:20:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-03-13 19:20:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:20:16 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:20:16 - /usr/bin/c

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

On 2012-03-13 11:08, Alexandre Martins wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: ... >>> I have the libc compilled with "MALLOC_DEBUG" flag to detect double free. >>> When i run this piece of code (atta

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 19:00:03 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-03-13 18:36:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 18:36:58 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-03-13 18:36:58 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:37:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:37:00 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 18:22:21 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 18:22:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 18:22:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:22:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:22:23 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:42 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:42 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:42 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:43 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:43 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-03-13 18:16:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 18:16:59 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-03-13 18:16:59 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:17:02 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-03-13 18:10:17 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 18:10:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-03-13 18:10:17 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:10:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 18:10:19 - /usr/bin/c

make world failure r232929

cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -fno-omit-frame-pointer -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libssp -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libssp/../../../contrib/gcclibs/libssp -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libssp/../../../contrib/gcclibs/include -std=gnu99 -c /usr/src/gnu/lib/libssp/../../../contrib/gcclibs/libssp/sprintf-ch

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > (Personal opinion) Not that great of an architecture. > > > And you're entitled to your opinion :). > > >> Again, I'm not sure

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:50:03 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...

At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:43:06 +0100, Gustau Pérez wrote: > > On 08/03/2012 22:20, George Neville-Neil wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a > > patch against HEAD > > which I have now subjected to testing using tools/regression/fsx. > >

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:27:41 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:27:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-03-13 17:27:41 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:27:43 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:27:43 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:18:19 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:18:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 17:18:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:18:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:18:21 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:19 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:24 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:24 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:13 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:13 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:12:15 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-03-13 17:07:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 17:07:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-03-13 17:07:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:07:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 17:07:02 - /usr/bin/c

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Super Bisquit > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:32 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox > > wrote: > > > >> TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on > >> freebsd-current.sentex.ca > >> TB --- 2012-03-1

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:50:03 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:27:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:27:48 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-03-13 16:27:48 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:27:50 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:27:50 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:17:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:17:27 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 16:17:27 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:17:28 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:17:28 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:12:50 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:12:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 16:12:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:12:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:12:51 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:11:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:11:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-03-13 16:11:45 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:11:47 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:11:47 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-03-13 16:06:28 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 16:06:28 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-03-13 16:06:28 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:06:29 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 16:06:29 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:03 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:50:02 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:32 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox > wrote: > >> TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on >> freebsd-current.sentex.ca >> TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for >> powerpc/powerpc >> TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:32 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for > powerpc/powerpc > TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2012-03-1

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:27:31 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:27:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-03-13 15:27:31 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:27:31 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:27:31 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:51 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:51 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:11:46 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:49 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:49 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:49 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:51 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 15:10:51 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-13 14:50:00 - /usr/bin/c

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

Dear, On Tuesday 13 March 2012 15:18:31 jb wrote: > Alexandre Martins netasq.com> writes: > > ... > > first.c: > > ... > > second.c > > ... > > main.c > > ... > > > > while(42) > > How do you exit that loop ? It's just a sample. There is no exit here, you have to kill the process. >

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 22:52 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 03/12/12 22:45, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened > >> simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

Alexandre Martins netasq.com> writes: > ... > first.c: > ... > second.c > ... > main.c > ... > while(42) How do you exit that loop ? > ... > Compilation and execution : > > gcc -shared -O0 -g second.c -o second.so > gcc -shared -O0 -g first.c -o libfirst.so > gcc -O0 -g toto.c -lfirst

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13:17:52 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:08:40AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > >

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:08:40AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I'm currently having some trouble with the dynamic loader. > > > > >

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I'm currently having some trouble with the dynamic loader. > > > > I have the libc compilled with "MALLOC_DEBUG" flag to detect double free. > > W