FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1151 - Unstable

2015-06-30 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1151 - Unstable: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1151/ to view the results. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1150 - Fixed

2015-06-30 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1150 - Fixed: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1150/ to view the results. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To uns

Re: "proper way" or "unworkable idea" ?

2015-06-30 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 30/06/2015 17:32, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > >> If I've a spare /mnt/usr/src , it seems buildworld quite soon fails, >> where it otherwise may succeed in /usr/src. Any CLI parameters or> the >> build system is hardcoded enough so that there will always be >> problems? >

Re: UEFI boot fail on higher resolutions (Re: Acer E3-112 and UEFI)

2015-06-30 Thread Jakob Alvermark
On Wed, February 4, 2015 15:04, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > On 31 dec 2014, at 16:24, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > >> On Tue, December 30, 2014 17:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 12/30/14 06:40, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Have been playing with this machi

Re: "proper way" or "unworkable idea" ?

2015-06-30 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > If I've a spare /mnt/usr/src , it seems buildworld quite soon fails, > where it otherwise may succeed in /usr/src. Any CLI parameters or> the > build system is hardcoded enough so that there will always be > problems? The only thing hard coded is the default MAKEOBJDIRPR

Re: powerpc and powerpc64 builds broken

2015-06-30 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Justin Hibbits wrote: > > Yeah, crossbuilds work fine. It's the actual run-on-real-hardware bit > > that doesn't. > > > > (powerpc64 runs fine in qemu-devel; people should try it!) > > r284345 (introduction of metamode) is the problem. I bisected it on > the power8 and it reliably fails this way

Re: powerpc and powerpc64 builds broken

2015-06-30 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Justin Hibbits wrote: >> > Yeah, crossbuilds work fine. It's the actual run-on-real-hardware bit >> > that doesn't. >> > >> > (powerpc64 runs fine in qemu-devel; people should try it!) >> >> r284345 (introduction of metamode) is the probl

Re: powerpc and powerpc64 builds broken

2015-06-30 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Jun 30, 2015 1:11 AM, "Perry Hutchison" wrote: > > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > I think trying to understand why the hack was added is not > > possible. > > In an ideal world, "svn blame" would identify the commit in which > it was added, and that commit's log entry would explain why :) T

FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1149 - Unstable

2015-06-30 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1149 - Unstable: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1149/ to view the results. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Re: "proper way" or "unworkable idea" ?

2015-06-30 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Jeffrey Bouquet wrote this message on Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10 -0700: > > If I've a spare /mnt/usr/src , it seems buildworld quite > > soon fails, where it otherwise may succeed in /usr/src. Any CLI parameters > > or > > the build system is hardcod

Re: powerpc and powerpc64 builds broken

2015-06-30 Thread Perry Hutchison
Konstantin Belousov wrote: > I think trying to understand why the hack was added is not > possible. In an ideal world, "svn blame" would identify the commit in which it was added, and that commit's log entry would explain why :) ___ freebsd-current@fre