Re: Boot failure - svn up from this morning

2017-03-02 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:32:39 -0800 "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" wrote > > On Mar 2, 2017, at 21:16, Chris H wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:56:38 -0500 (EST) AN wrote > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> I'm having a major problem after

Re: Boot failure - svn up from this morning

2017-03-02 Thread Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 21:16, Chris H wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:56:38 -0500 (EST) AN wrote > >> Hi: >> >> I'm having a major problem after updating a 12-current machine today. >> After buildworld/kernel/install cycle on reboot I'm getting the

Re: Boot failure - svn up from this morning

2017-03-02 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:56:38 -0500 (EST) AN wrote > Hi: > > I'm having a major problem after updating a 12-current machine today. > After buildworld/kernel/install cycle on reboot I'm getting the following > failure: > > "/boot/kernel/kernel text=0xb7716f data=0x100548+0x398358

Boot failure - svn up from this morning

2017-03-02 Thread AN
Hi: I'm having a major problem after updating a 12-current machine today. After buildworld/kernel/install cycle on reboot I'm getting the following failure: "/boot/kernel/kernel text=0xb7716f data=0x100548+0x398358 elf64_loadimage: read failed can't load file '/boot/kernel/kernel':

Re: effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Alan Somers
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Rodney W. Grimes > wrote: > ... >> Even if that is the case file system cache effects should NOT be >> visible to a userland process. This is NOT as

Re: effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Ngie Cooper
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: ... > Even if that is the case file system cache effects should NOT be > visible to a userland process. This is NOT as if your running > 2 different processing beating on a file. Your test cases are >

Re: effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2017-Mar-02 22:29:46 +0300, Subbsd wrote: > >>During some interval after strip call, du will show 512B for any file. > >>If execute du(1) after strip(1) without delay, this behavior is reproduced

Re: effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Subbsd
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2017-Mar-02 22:29:46 +0300, Subbsd wrote: >>During some interval after strip call, du will show 512B for any file. >>If execute du(1) after strip(1) without delay, this behavior is reproduced >>100%:

Re: effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2017-Mar-02 22:29:46 +0300, Subbsd wrote: >During some interval after strip call, du will show 512B for any file. >If execute du(1) after strip(1) without delay, this behavior is reproduced >100%: What filesystem are you using? strip(1) rewrites the target file and du(1)

Re: Buildworld fails if WITHOUT_INET6=YES defined

2017-03-02 Thread Ngie Cooper
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Alex Deiter wrote: > Hello, > > Please apply patch from upstream: > > https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/pull/541 > > Fix compilation if INET6 isn't defined. > Addresses GitHub issue #541, but differently from the pull request (it

Re: PowerMac G5 and KMS

2017-03-02 Thread Mark Millard
On 2017-Mar-2, at 9:37 AM, Justin Hibbits wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Hiroo Ono (小野寛生) > wrote: >> I recently installed 12-current powerpc64 r313561 to a PowerMac G5 >> (it is dual processor, but I do not know its detail). >> >> When I try to load

Re: Buildworld fails if WITHOUT_INET6=YES defined

2017-03-02 Thread Alex Deiter
Hello, Please apply patch from upstream: https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/pull/541 Fix compilation if INET6 isn't defined. Addresses GitHub issue #541, but differently from the pull request (it defines gen_gateway() with a function prototype rather than using a pre-prototype-style

effect of strip(1) on du(1)

2017-03-02 Thread Subbsd
Hi, Not sure for FreeBSD < 12, but i found interesting behavior strip effect(1) on du(1) command: -- % strip /bin/pax && sleep 4 && du -sh /bin/pax 65K/bin/pax % strip /bin/pax && sleep 3 && du -sh /bin/pax 65K/bin/pax % strip /bin/pax && sleep 2 && du -sh /bin/pax 512B/bin/pax %

Re: PowerMac G5 and KMS

2017-03-02 Thread A. Wilcox
On 02/03/17 11:37, Justin Hibbits wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Hiroo Ono (小野寛生) > wrote: >> kernel: drmn0: on vgapci0 >> kernel: info: [drm] RADEON_IS_AGP >> kernel: info: [drm] initializing kernel modesetting (RV350 0x1002:0x4150 >> 0x1002:0x4150). > >

Re: PowerMac G5 and KMS

2017-03-02 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Hiroo Ono (小野寛生) wrote: > I recently installed 12-current powerpc64 r313561 to a PowerMac G5 > (it is dual processor, but I do not know its detail). > > When I try to load drm2.ko and radeonkms.ko, > the screen turns into black and

Re: CFLAGS for certain ports

2017-03-02 Thread Alan Somers
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2 Mar 2017, at 12:02, Mingo Rrubioer wrote: >> >> I would like to see how well FreeBSD does as a workstation OS in the >> HPC world due to its stability and reliability, as well as LLVM/clang.

Re: svn commit: r313268 - head/sys/kern [through -r313271 for atomic_fcmpset use and later: fails on PowerMac G5 "Quad Core"; -r313266 works]

2017-03-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > Summary of the transition interval: > > > > So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good > > idea to avoid anything that is after -r313254 > > and before

Re: CFLAGS for certain ports

2017-03-02 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2 Mar 2017, at 12:02, Mingo Rrubioer wrote: > > I would like to see how well FreeBSD does as a workstation OS in the > HPC world due to its stability and reliability, as well as LLVM/clang. > I would like to know if FreeBSD has something similar to Gentoo's >

Re: svn commit: r313268 - head/sys/kern [through -r313271 for atomic_fcmpset use and later: fails on PowerMac G5 "Quad Core"; -r313266 works]

2017-03-02 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2017-Feb-28, at 10:13 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:31:04PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> Thus the PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad

CFLAGS for certain ports

2017-03-02 Thread Mingo Rrubioer
Hello, New to FreeBSD and first post. If I got the wrong mailing list, just let me know where to ask my questions. I would like to see how well FreeBSD does as a workstation OS in the HPC world due to its stability and reliability, as well as LLVM/clang. I would like to know if FreeBSD has

Re: panic: invalid bcd xxx

2017-03-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 00:37:35 CET, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 2 Mar 2017, at 00:35, Adrian Chadd wrote: This is an emulated BIOS though, right? I don't know if we're going to get the RTC 'bugfixed'... It's SeaBIOS, yes. I feel like this