On Thu Nov 3 11, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 11:28:47AM +0000, Alexander Best
> escribió:
>
> > > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure
> > > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or sh
hi there,
i recently bought a western digital 1 terrabyte usb2/usb3 hdd:
[83611.209514] umass0: on usbus3
[83613.618514] da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus6 target 0 lun 0
[83613.618514] da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6
device
[83613.618514] da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
[83613.618514] da0: 953837MB (1
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > .. how many users is this going to trip up?
>
> cons25 is pretty much FUBAR on 9.x+ compared to previous releases. I
> went through several iterations with ed@ over the fact that various
> curses b
On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Sat Nov 19 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> > .. how many users is this going to trip up?
> >>
On Sun Nov 20 11, Jason Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards:
> >
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console
> >> direct access, opening the easy editor has sever
hi there,
i've been playing with clang tot and noticed the following error:
/usr/local/bin/clang -c -O3 -pipe -fno-inline-functions -fno-strict-aliasing
-march=core2 -std=c99 -g -fdiagnostics-show-option -fformat-extensions -Wall
-Wcast-qual -Winline -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-prototype
On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> kill it.
>
> Warner
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s
> > buildworld'
> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by
> > Warner:
> >
> > In
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> kill it.
> >>
> >> Warner
> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >>
is there a chance to change cp's behaviour in connection with the -R switch, so
that it stops after the first error? i just ran into the following situation:
1) cp -ai bla /mnt/umass
2) i got a lot of warnings that /mnt/umass was full
3) cp -an bla /mnt/umass
4) ...that didn't work, since cp creat
On Sun Dec 18 11, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine
> > (Pentium
>
On Sun Dec 18 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Sun Dec 18 11, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > > On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >
On Mon Dec 19 11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 12/18/11 04:34, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >The trouble is that there's lots of anecdotal evidence, but noone's
> >really gone digging deep into _their_ example of why it's broken. The
> >developers who know this stuff don't see anything wrong. That hints t
hi there,
i'm using a usb hdd with the following specs:
otaku% sudo smartctl -i /dev/da0
smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Wes
On Mon Dec 19 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111219221617.ga70...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
>
> >ps: the hdd only gets mounted read-only!
>
> There is no known wear-effects in flash storage as long as you
> only read.
>
> You may nee
On Mon Dec 19 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111219224700.ga75...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> >On Mon Dec 19 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <20111219221617.ga70...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> >>
> &
On Mon Dec 19 11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:56:33PM +0000, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 19 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > In message <20111219224700.ga75...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> > > >On Mon Dec 19 11,
On Thu Dec 22 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask some feedback on the attached patch, which cleans up
> the kernel optimization options for amd64. This was touched upon
> earlier by Alexander Best in freebsd-toolchain, here:
i've been using such setti
On Thu Dec 22 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >On Thu Dec 22 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I would like to ask some feedback on the attached patch, which cleans up
> >>the kernel optimi
On Fri Dec 23 11, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 23.12.11 08:47, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> >A further thing is that I cannot understand the people here sometimes.
> >I would like that the -RELEASE versions of FreeBSD perform well
> >without any further optimizations.
>
> The -RELEASE things is
On Fri Dec 23 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:51:47 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu Dec 22 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wro
On Fri Dec 23 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-12-23 18:55, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
> >>The only thing my patch makes sure of, is that amd64 does the same thing
> >>as all other arches, e.g.: compile with a low optimization
hi there,
is -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 really necessary for i386 builds any longer?
i built GENERIC (including modules) with and without that flag. the results
are:
1654496 bytes with the flag set
vs.
1654952 bytes with the flag unset
the gcc(1) man page states the following:
"
This extra al
On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >is -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 really necessary for i386 builds any
> >longer?
> >i built GENERIC (including modules) with and without that flag. the results
> >are:
>
>
On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >is -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 really necessary for i386 builds any
> >longer?
> >i built GENERIC (including modules) with and without that flag. the results
> >are:
>
>
On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >>On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>
> >>>is -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 really necessary for i386 builds any
&g
On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >Well, the whole kernel is bloated at the moment, sorry.
> >
> >I've been trying to build the _bare minimum_ required to bootstrap
> >-HEAD on these embedded boards and I can't get the kernel down below 5
> >megaby
On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >On Sat Dec 24 11, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >>On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
> >...
> >>>the gcc(1) man page states the following:
> >>>
> >>
ok...so we all know that top(1) cannot compute the exact CPU usage for all
processes, since some processes get spawned and exit so fast that they don't
fall into the calculation range. i think nobody is getting angry when top(1)
is off by a few percent.
however please take a look at the following
hi there,
i grep'ed through src/sys and found several places where WERROR= was set in
order to get rid of the default -Werror setting. i tried to remove those
WERROR= overrides from any Makefile, where doing so did not break tinderbox.
in those cases, where it couldn't be completely removed, i ad
On Tue Dec 27 11, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2011-12-26 10:10:40 (+), Alexander Best wrote:
> > i grep'ed through src/sys and found several places where WERROR= was set in
> > order to get rid of the default -Werror setting. i tried to remove those
> > WERROR= override
On Tue Dec 27 11, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:27:43AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Tue Dec 27 11, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > > On 2011-12-26 10:10:40 (+0000), Alexander Best
> > > wrote:
> > > > i grep'ed through src/sy
On Tue Dec 27 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Dec 26, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Philip Paeps wrote:
>
> > On 2011-12-26 10:10:40 (+0000), Alexander Best wrote:
> >> i grep'ed through src/sys and found several places where WERROR= was set in
> >> order to get rid of t
hi there,
would it be possible to update the CXXFLAGS example in
share/examples/etc/make.conf?
looking at the gcc(1) man page, -fconserve-space seems to be a bad example.
can somebody thing of a C++ specific option which makes more sense?
or maybe something like -Weffc++? although idealy this sh
On Thu Jan 12 12, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 12.01.2012 12:18 (UTC+1), Alexander Motin wrote:
> >On 01/12/12 12:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:33:17 +0200
> >>Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>>I would like request for testing of my work on further HDA sound driver
> >>>improvement.
On Sat Jan 14 12, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 01/14/12 15:48, Alexander Best wrote:
> >On Thu Jan 12 12, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >>On 12.01.2012 12:18 (UTC+1), Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>>On 01/12/12 12:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, 11 Jan 201
On Wed Sep 5 12, Eir Nym wrote:
> I've got following warnings [no errors had been generated while
> -Werror is in command line] and want to know if they are ok. There are
> much more same warnings in modules, but I worry about kernel :
> Kernel config: http://eroese.org/_/_/pub/bsd/240070/GENERIC_
On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
> > any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf could
> > be
> > added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is really
> > not
> >
On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
> > any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf could
> > be
> > added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is really
> > not
> >
On Tue Feb 28 12, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf
> > > could be
> > > added before the release of fre
On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> >On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
> >>that would
> >>make certain things a lot easier. dealing wi
hi there,
while installing world with DESTDIR!=/ and running delete-old afterwards, i
noticed the following entries. if i'm not mistaken delete-old should not need
to delete anything, because DESTDIR was completely empty before running
installworld:
>>> Removing old files (only deletes safe to de
hi there,
i'm running HEAD on amd64 and experienced some really annoying resets during
the last couple of months.
when i do 'sysctl -a' or 'sysctl -a|grep bla', my whole system does a hard
reset. no core dump gets produced.
isn't there a way to find out which sysctl variable is causing the reset
On Sat Apr 14 12, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >
> > > This is probably a sysctl handler that is causing the reboot. You can
> > > run this one-liner to spot the culprit (use sh):
> > >
> > > for i in $(sysctl -Na); do sysctl $i >
On Mon Feb 28 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I have a patch that shrinks boot2 some:
>
> 1) it switches kname to be just a pointer instead of an array
>thus avoiding a couple of memcpy()s
>
> 2) it changes ioctl to unsigned from uint8_t
>
> 3) it changes the first keyhit limit to
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following error occurs when i try to build r219385.
>
> cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -I/usr/src/kerberos5/tools/make-roken/../../include -std=gnu99 -c
> make-roken.c
> make-roken.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switc
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> >What process did you follow to get here?
>
> I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld.
>
> > that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no
> > longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in
>
On Tue Mar 8 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> > either "native" or "nocona" (actually native should evaluate to nocona):
> >
> > touch _native_test.c && gcc -march=native -### _native_test.c
> >
> > should tell which -march and -mtune settings gcc assumes for "native".
> >
> > indeed there are some kno
On Thu Mar 10 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-03-09 22:18, David Schultz wrote:
> >The proliferation of -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 options in the
> >makefiles is probably not needed: I'm pretty sure -mno-sse implies
> >the other two, unless -msse3 is specified explicitly.
>
> Indeed, contrib
On Wed Mar 9 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> > I have prepared a patch that finishes the "core2" support part and
> > backports from gcc-4.3
> > the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3).
> > It is enabled for -march=core2 by default.
> >
> > Testing and comments are welcome.
> >
> > Patch:
> >
On Thu Mar 10 11, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Here is a base gcc upgrade to the latest GPLv2 version (rev. 127959).
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/head-gcc-422-prerelease.patch
>
> Open questions:
> Do we want the "4.2.2 prerelase 20070831" version tag or stick to "4.2.1
> 20070831"?
i'd
On Thu Mar 10 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Mar 10 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2011-03-09 22:18, David Schultz wrote:
> > >The proliferation of -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 options in the
> > >makefiles is probably not needed: I'm pretty sure -mno-sse im
hi there,
just wanted to ask what the current situation on WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL is? it
seems the option gets completely ignored after a recent commit.
should src.conf be adjusted to mention that WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL == noop or
should the option be completely removed?
also in usr.sbin/Makefile, the s
On Sun Mar 20 11, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} conditional to remove old
> files on 8.2-RELEASE so I started to write it without watching if
> -CURRENT already make it in
> /usr/src/tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc.
i think it's best
On Fri Mar 25 11, Artem Belevich wrote:
> --Artem
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Nerius Landys wrote:
> >> Use devel/subversion-freebsd though so it expands the $FreeBSD$ RCS tag.
> >
> > I just did that. I am afraid however that all of my files in /etc
> > will have a different RCS
On Sat Mar 26 11, Nerius Landys wrote:
> > one could also use the -F switch in connection with mergemaster(8).
>
> >From mergemaster manpage:
>
> "If the files differ only by VCS Id ($FreeBSD) install the new file."
>
> Yes that is exactly what I want, thanks.
np.
>
> By the way, are there an
On Mon Mar 28 11, Veniamin Gvozdikov wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> I have question about packages. Why packages don't supported detection os
> arch?
i think freebsd-questions@ is better suited for that question.
--
a13x
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org m
On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote:
> Could this help?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680279
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Also, it looks like npviewer.bin still hangs to resources on until
> > Firefox closes (or I kill it :)..), so something stil
On Tue Mar 29 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 05:35 pm, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote:
> > > Could this help?
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680279
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 2
On Wed Mar 30 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Mar 29 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 March 2011 05:35 pm, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote:
> > > > Could this help?
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Wed Mar 30 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:50 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:46 am, Buganini wrote:
> > > It seems work well now, no lockup when I went through pages.
> > > but I still got lockup when I right-click on some flash
> > > advertisemen
On Thu Mar 31 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:58 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > I wrote an ugly but very simple workaround. Drop the attached
> > patch in www/nspluginwrapper-devel/files and replaces old one,
> > rebuild, reinstall, redo plugin wrappers, etc., etc...
>
> I just
hi there,
i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in
devicestat.h:
/*
* These types are intended to aid statistics gathering/display programs.
* The first 13 types (up to the 'target' flag) are identical numerically
* to the SCSI device type numbers. The next 3 t
On Fri Apr 1 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 01:03, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > devstat_buildmatch(3) crashes with certain strings. you can test this by
> > doing one of:
> >
> > iostat -t ","
> > iostat -t &quo
On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in
> > devicestat.h:
> >
> > /*
> > * These types are
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let
tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
dir(s).
i ran a test via
make toolchains
make MAKE_JUST_KERNELS=yes tinderbox
and nothing seemed to go wrong with the extra warni
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >> hi there,
> >>
> >> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best
On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in
> >>
On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > >>> i think there are multip
On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
&
On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>>> Assuming that SCSI and IDE in -t option means transport type,
On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> my cd0 is a pata atapi dvdrom drive and i have the following in my kernel
> >>> conf:
> >>>
&g
On Mon Apr 11 11, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > >> Alexander Best wrote:
> > >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wro
On Mon Apr 11 11, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 13:59:35 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > >&g
On Thu Apr 14 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> > You can just copy /usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/tmmintrin.h to
> > /usr/include/gcc/4.2 for now, or apply the attached patch and run "make
> > install" in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/include. I'll commit a fix to
> > -current tonight.
>
> This is great,
On Thu Apr 14 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-04-14 15:20, Alexander Best wrote:
> ...
> >>There's one more minor hiccup described here
> >>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-March/023415.html
> >>
> >>This issue as of r220
On Thu Apr 14 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-04-14 16:03, Alexander Best wrote:
> ...
> >for me too when using clang. i cannot say anything about base gcc because
> >it's
> >dated march 13th on my machine, which is before r219697 was committed.
> >
> &
On Thu Apr 14 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> > It works fine here:
> >
> > $ gcc -### -march=native -S empty.c
> > Using built-in specs.
> > Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
> > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
> > Thread model: posix
> > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
>
On Thu Apr 14 11, George Liaskos wrote:
> > It works fine here:
> >
> > $ gcc -### -march=native -S empty.c
> > Using built-in specs.
> > Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
> > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
> > Thread model: posix
> > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
>
On Mon Apr 25 11, Steve Wills wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed lately that when doing heavy IO, my 9-CURRENT system (Fri
> Apr 15 23:33:46 EDT 2011) is quite unresponsive. I have two ZFS mirrors
> setup and run KDE4. The system has 12GB of RAM.
>
On Sat May 7 11, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2011-05-07 02:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-05-07 02:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
> TB --- 2011-05-07 02:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2011-05-07 02:10:28 - cvsupping
hi there,
i recently switched my old pata dvd-drive with a new sata one:
cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
cd0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes)
cd0: cd present [355062 x 2048 byte records]
however now i experience the following issues:
1)
otaku% recover
sorry. i wanted to cc freebsd-scsi and accidently wrote freebsd-cam.
On Wed May 18 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i recently switched my old pata dvd-drive with a new sata one:
>
> cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
> cd0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5,
On Wed May 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/05/2011 11:27 Alexander Best said the following:
> > sorry. i wanted to cc freebsd-scsi and accidently wrote freebsd-cam.
> >
> > On Wed May 18 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> >> hi there,
> >>
> >> i re
On Wed May 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/05/2011 13:24 Alexander Best said the following:
> > i dug into this a little further and it appears that this only happens with
> > CD-Rs. using CD-ROMs, DVDs or DVD+Rs this doesn't happen. i tested this with
> > CD-Rs
On Wed May 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/05/2011 13:24 Alexander Best said the following:
> > i dug into this a little further and it appears that this only happens with
> > CD-Rs. using CD-ROMs, DVDs or DVD+Rs this doesn't happen. i tested this with
> > CD-Rs
On Fri May 27 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 18:46, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Some times in top, I don't want to see all the per-CPU idle threads but
> > instead focus on the non-idle threads that are running. Especially on a
> > system with a lot of CPUs, the idle threads can push al
hi there,
i'm running HEAD on amd64. yesterday i updated my kernel to r223109. i'm now
seeing two issues, which weren't there beforehand:
1)
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: ATA-7 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
ada0: Command Queueing
On Thu Jun 16 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
i reverted my kernel back to r222890. everything works fine now and both issues
i mentioned below dissapeared.
i also discovered another issue with the more recent kernel:
i was getting errno -128 with a lot of apps. but only the first tim
On Thu Jun 23 11, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't
> remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system.
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> >Does anyone object to this patch?
> >
> >David Wolfskill and I have run TM
On Fri Jun 17 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Jun 16 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
>
> i reverted my kernel back to r222890. everything works fine now and both
> issues
> i mentioned below dissapeared.
the previous issues (xpt_action_default and DIOCSKERNEL
On Sat Jun 25 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Jun 17 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 16 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> >
> > i reverted my kernel back to r222890. everything works fine now and both
> > issues
> > i mentioned b
hi there,
any reason why bin/139389 hasn't been committed, yet? i think seeing the thread
id in top -H output is extremely useful!
cheers.
alex
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To uns
On Wed Jul 6 11, arrowdodger wrote:
> 2011/7/6 O. Hartmann
>
> > When performing an update on the ports tree via "portsnap fetch update" or
> > when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
> > data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
On Wed Jul 6 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/07/2011 16:33 Alexander Best said the following:
> > you might also want to try enabling options IPI_PREEMPTION. no idea, if this
> > improves your situation, though.
>
> Just in case, this option has effect for 4BSD scheduler onl
On Wed Jul 6 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 6 July 2011 13:19, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > any reason why bin/139389 hasn't been committed, yet? i think seeing the
> > thread
> > id in top -H output is extremely useful!
>
> I thin
On Wed Jul 6 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Wed Jul 6 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > On 6 July 2011 13:19, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > any reason why bin/139389 hasn't been committed, yet? i think seeing the
> > > th
On Fri Jul 8 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> This patch lets you use 'P' while top is running to toggle between per-CPU and
> global CPU stats.
very cool. i always thought that being able to interactivly enable/disable
per-cpu stats in top would be a useful feature. great to see this being
implemented.
On Fri Jul 8 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Jul 8 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > This patch lets you use 'P' while top is running to toggle between per-CPU
> > and
> > global CPU stats.
>
> very cool. i always thought that being able to interactivly enable
On Sat Jul 9 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Jul 8 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Fri Jul 8 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > This patch lets you use 'P' while top is running to toggle between
> > > per-CPU and
> > > global CPU stats.
> >
201 - 300 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
