Hi,
[Moving thread to -current, added a...@freebsd.org to the Cc: list as he
changed that code recently.]
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
(OT, yes, but I'd like to take a stab at explaining why these things
fall to the wayside..)
On 7 July 2011 12:08, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the point to even start looking at an issue
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 11/07/2011 23:33 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is
particularly interesting
Hi,
[re-sent publicly, I did not Replied-to-all:)]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ali Mashtizadeh mashtiza...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe someone can setup something like reviewboard [1] for developers
to use. This may also help folks who want to keep abreast of the
current work in
Hi,
From today's -CURRENT:
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD
, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From today's -CURRENT:
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From today's -CURRENT:
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights
Hi,
[added -current@ to the CC list, as the issue is still present in 9.0-BETA2]
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We have been trying to track down a bad mbuf
Hi,
Shouldn't packet freed in IFQ_ENQUEUE() because the queue is full be
accounted as dropped, cf attached patch ?
Thanks,
- Arnaud
diff --git a/sys/net/if_var.h b/sys/net/if_var.h
index 2dcb6f9..387f614 100644
--- a/sys/net/if_var.h
+++ b/sys/net/if_var.h
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ do { \
Hi,
I just had a look to the way the timeout specified to watchdogd is
passed to the kernel. watchdogd(8) says:
The -t timeout specifies the desired timeout period in seconds. The
default timeout is 16 seconds.
So as a dumb user, I would expect `-t 30' to set the timeout to 30s.
You
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
cacqu3mws0hhnzchowmwwg8u9vd2pbdkaqf6pdw5zs_xo_s6...@mail.gmail.com
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
I just had a look to the way the timeout specified to watchdogd is
passed to the kernel. watchdogd(8) says
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:25:19PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
Shouldn't packet freed in IFQ_ENQUEUE() because the queue is full be
accounted as dropped, cf attached patch ?
Hmm, I think err would be set
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
cacqu3mvf5mwqec+s9vkk4mljenmos9q_bjwkbyefzabfjo6...@mail.gmail.com
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, and the code
needlessly complicated.
As I said
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
Next thing I did was try to recompile the kernel to streamline it and add
features I want compiled in, such as ipfw and dummynet. Alas, I saw no sign
of the BSD-licensed Clang compiler, for which I've waited for many
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:52:37 pm Brett Glass wrote:
First thing I noticed, when running the new FreeBSD installer from
a memory stick image, is that disk partitioning
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
At 12:03 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
I can't speak to the one-big-fs bit (there was another thread long ago
about
that). However, as to the partitioning bit,
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
2) I saw many warnings of lock order reversals under the GENERIC kernel, in
particular in the file system code. These obviously should be fixed before
release.
Where did you report them ? [btw, they might
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
My personal preference would be to place portions of the directory tree
which contain critical
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. I do FreeBSD installs on 1GB flash disks. You know, so I don't have
to nuke the windows install. Just so I can test out things. :)
If people would like to see a more detailed partition editor, please
supply
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
Then why don't you provide symbols for the whole system, including
binaries and libraries ? At least be consistent in your argument...
And, yes, I have patches
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Sep-26 19:48:23 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
The problem with /boot on a dedicated partition is the the kernel,
since at least 8.x, is installed
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Jaakko Heinonen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I think that using the FEATURE() macro and feature_present(3) might be
more appropriate for this.
Thanks.
--
Jaakko
Oh, OK. I was
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But
just so you know most of
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
I cross
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your Wiki name?
ArnaudLacombe
created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
sending this email with.
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
released
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
me credential.
I may have filled in all the date from publicly available
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
released
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:46 PM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 07:48:23PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
My recollection is that this is because kensmith forgot to take
'makeoptions DEBUG=-g' out of GENERIC when branching stable/8, and no one
noticed until a
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message alpine.gso.1.10.1110071341430@multics.mit.edu, Benjamin
Kaduk
writes:
Now, an ordinary user who is
doing this for the first time might ask, why do I need
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
On 10/7/11 3:18 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
My guess is that GEOM isn't letting go of the GPT table and you have
multiple partitions in the GPT table and you're not
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1110071352210.2...@wonkity.com, Warren Block
write
s:
# mount /dev/da0p2 /mnt
# dd if=/tmp/FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=64k
dd: /dev/da0: Operation not permitted
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
CACqU3MVgVUxe+Mtaf9wq6oz5=PZAq=sx-ihyqh1gyjd3pxm...@mail.gmail.com
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
If you expose a setting, you cannot rely on a user not to use it even
if you told him not to. As long
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
cacqu3muqq6xqtfxhve1jtu4aey3kcdktcprd7ojq3ourdc8...@mail.gmail.com
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
User do not care to understand the meaning of an option, you leave a
hole somewhere, it will be used. I'm
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk
wrote:
In message
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
CACqU3MUT36PVxP2hMuizTxYLcuTkBQ_fOfrELit=7ueq-hv...@mail.gmail.com
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:
Arnaud,
Are we done here ?
'your call.
A.
___
freebsd
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-10-11 15:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
I've attached a fix for the lsof port, which also makes it build on
10.0-CURRENT (this was easy to fix here, as lsof uses
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andricd...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM, René Ladan r...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/10/11 Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011 3:25 AM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
On 10/11/2011 1:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Larry Rosenmanl...@lerctr.org wrote:
On 10/11/2011 1:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
libprocstat is _itself_ a problem:
% git grep 'define _KERNEL' .
[...]
lib/libprocstat/cd9660.c:#define _KERNEL
lib/libprocstat/nwfs.c:#define _KERNEL
lib
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-10-09 19:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I had gotten a PR
Hi folks,
I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
10-current kernel complains the following way:
ipmi0: IPMI System Interface at iomem 0-0x1 on isa0
ipmi0: KCS mode found at mem 0x0 alignment 0x1 on isa
ipmi0: couldn't configure I/O resource
device_attach: ipmi0
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
10-current kernel complains the following way:
ipmi0: IPMI System Interface at iomem 0-0x1 on isa0
ipmi0: KCS mode found at mem 0x0
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/11/11 12:57 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Julian Elischerjul...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 10/11/11 12:36 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
I will repeat myself here, but I
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com
Hi folks,
There is many case recently when I really wished timestamp were present in the
post-mortem msgbuf. Such situation could be when userland application segfault
potentially
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft k...@mthelicon.com wrote:
Hi Current,
Should the new Beta 3 have options COMPAT_FREEBSD8 in the GENERIC
kernel config file? Or, does this happen when it goes RC?
What would you expect this option to cover ?
I'd assume that no
Andry Gapon wrote:
Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
name
(i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of panicing.
That should do the job.
- Arnaud
---
sys/kern/vfs_mountroot.c | 45
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Andry Gapon wrote:
Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
name
(i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of
panicing.
That should do the job
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Nali Toja nalit...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org writes:
On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org, Alexander Best writes:
1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:55:28AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
That's what most people think.
Could be. But to the extent that it's true, I have no reason to believe
that it's a perspective that is held
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Nali Toja nalit...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org writes:
On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon Oct 17 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Nali Toja
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
cc -c -O
fixed width
Arnaud Lacombe (3):
msgbuf(4): convert `msg_needsnl' to a bit flag
msgbuf(4): add logic to prepend timestamp on new line
msgbuf(4): add a sysctl to toggle timestamp prepend
sys/kern/subr_msgbuf.c | 54 ---
sys/sys/msgbuf.h
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
Hi Arnaud!
* Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com, 20111017 22:41:
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ getnanouptime(ts);
+ err = snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, [%zd.%.6ld] ,
+ ts.tv_sec
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
Ah, missed something.
+ getnanouptime(ts);
+ err = snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, [%zd.%.6ld] ,
+ ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec / 1000);
It seems we also have a getmicrouptime(), which returns
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
pros, cons?
I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0.
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
I think
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5
Hi,
2011/10/18 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wbl
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:53:11 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully
Hi,
2011/10/7 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru:
On 07.10.2011 23:41, Glen Barber wrote:
In my experience, without kern.geom.debugflags=16, the MBR will not be
written to the memstick, leaving you with what would effectively be a
coaster in the not-so-distant past.
The problem is that
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Hartmann, O.
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 10/24/11 00:38, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Kernel building fails since today when kernel gets compiled via CLANG:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of error
messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after Ctrl-Alt-F1
discontinuation of X ) . This is making it extremely
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if
it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after.
Given that RC1 is already out,
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
Again, I did not spent time converting all in-tree consumers
from the (potentially)
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 07:22:51AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding the _vm_page_lock() vs. vm_page_lock_func(), the mutex.h has
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Below is the KBI patch after
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[restored cc: to the original poster]
on 02/11/2011 08:10 Benjamin Kaduk said the following:
I am perhaps confused. Last I checked, bsd.kmod.mk caused '-include
opt_global.h' to be passed on the command line. Is the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm unsure if this replies to your concerns because you just criticize
without making a real technical question in this post.
I made comments
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
suffix to func. Perhaps, kbi or KBI. In other words, something
that hints at the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only talk
without action, I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
quite a large patch-set, I
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[cc list trimmed]
on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only talk
without action, I did implement
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/11/7 Arnaud
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[cc list trimmed]
on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
To avoid future
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only talk
without action, I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
quite a large patch-set, I
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischerjul...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/8/11 9:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
However, if you want to know, my heart tends to be with BSDs.
Unfortunately, it's a sad love-story where your Beloved keeps
deceiving you day after day. You want
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
you (committers)
I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
you (committers) any more... :-)
The real question is rather whether
Hi,
The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
[non-exclusively] on the following:
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size
Hi *,
[I could have renamed the subject 1001 fancy ways to crash FreeBSD,
but I'll avoid :)]
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
[non-exclusively] on the following:
After finally having
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
[non-exclusively] on the following:
After finally having been able
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
/*
* These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the kernel
* to walk the tree and get the type so it can print the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Boris Popov b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
It is interesting, that the old drive with this code are still alive
Hi folks,
The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might require
resources from multiple other (pseudo-)devices.
For example, a device is sitting on an SMBus, but need to access a
software controlled LED, sitting on a
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
