On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:51:32PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:11:26 +0400
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
> > 06.09.2013 20:44, O. Hartmann пишет:
> > > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 20:08:59 +0400
> > > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > >
> > >> 06.09.2013 19:44, O. Hartmann пишет:
> > >>
>
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:52:13AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2013, at 23:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about:
> > undefined reference to `powl'
> >
> > It seems like libc++ is rely
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 00:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by
> > default.
> >
> > As a result we have a lot of fal
Hi,
I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by
default.
As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about:
undefined reference to `powl'
It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am I
missing something?
regards,
Bap
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
> I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.
>
> Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar
> messages ab
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 08:31:02PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Buildworld fails with
>
>
> ===> libexec/atf/atf-check (all)
> c++ -O2 -pipe -O3 -march=native -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O3
> -I/usr/src/libexec/atf/atf-check/../../../contrib/atf
> -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werro
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:35:37PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:27:07PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> > > On 24.07.2013 13:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > ...
&g
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:13:02PM +0400, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> If I understand you correct, hotspot crashes because of out of memory
> or some other resource constraint?
>
> Could you send me whole hs_err_.log file (or bet
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:13:02PM +0400, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> If I understand you correct, hotspot crashes because of out of memory
> or some other resource constraint?
>
> Could you send me whole hs_err_.log file (or bet
Hi all,
It's been a while since we are experiencing major problem on the package
buidling cluster: it dies when building package for head amd64. (the buidling
jail being the snapshort from July 7th iirc.)
After some investigation we discover that blacklisting openjdk6 allows the
building process
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:27:07PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 24.07.2013 13:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > ...
> >> Yes fuse in base is broken since r248084 downgrade sys/fs/fuse to that
> >> version
> >> and it will work, I'm investigating.
>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 24.07.2013 13:34, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:22:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Hi Pedro,
> >>
> >> Bapt tells me that there are FUSE issues in the most
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:36:10PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:16:44PM +0300, Alexander Panyushkin wrote:
> > 24.07.2013 18:22, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:42:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > >> O
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:16:44PM +0300, Alexander Panyushkin wrote:
> 24.07.2013 18:22, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:42:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >>
> >>> On
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:22:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Bapt tells me that there are FUSE issues in the most recent -HEAD and
> it's stopping poudriere from running.
Nah poudriere does not use yet fuse :)
>
> What's the story here?
>
I was about to mail you :)
It is broke
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:42:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> > On 19.07.2013 12:07, Alexander Panyushkin wrote:
> >
> >> 19.07.2013 19:42, Pedro Giffuni пишет:
> >>
> >>> (re-posting since the original response didn't make it through)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being
> > built
> > and installed by default on HEAD.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:51:00PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote:
> >
> >
> > If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away
> > for HEAD pkg access, I'll need to know so I can make the appropriate
> > changes in the HEAD
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:52:26PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> > On 14 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Teske, Devin wrote:
> >>
>
> Simple, really.
>
> Let's take RPM for example. The RPM package format has been ported to other
> platforms.
So does p
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 07:29:50AM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> > Or you
> > can maintain the old cruft for your business -- just don't expect
> > anyone else to use it, or even want to.
> >
>
>
> I have no intention of making old-world packages... but I also have no
> intention of using "p
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:12:19AM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > On 14/07/2013 06:48, Teske, Devin wrote:
> >> Question: Where can I learn more about the actual format of what's in
> >> the new tarballs? This is going to be important not f
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:11:11AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> fwiw, nanobsd also is still on pkg_*, but I intend to come up with
> patches for that if someone else has not already done so.
>
> mcl
There are lots of patches available everyone to have nanobsd using pkgng
I didn't commit any, bec
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being
> > built
> > and installed by default on HEAD.
Hi,
I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being built
and installed by default on HEAD.
If you are still relying on it, be careful and add WITH_PKGTOOLS=yes in your
src.conf(5)
regards,
Bapt
pgpc4PpvN64uc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:05:30AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Seems like the problem boils down to this:
>
> $ make -V MAKEFILE
> /usr/ports/security/vpnc/Makefile
> $ fmake -V MAKEFILE
> Makefile
>
> The only explicit assignments of MAKEFILE that I could find in ports
> infrastructure are t
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:39:03PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:34:19PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:17:24PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Bap
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:17:24PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > The pkg developement team is proud to announce the new 1.1.0 beta1 release
> > of
> > pkg.
>
> > - new experimental
- documentation
- bug report
- feedback
- ideas
List of people who contributed code:
Baptiste Daroussin, Matthew Seaman, Bryan Drewery, Vsevolod Stakhov,
Marin Atanasov Nikolov, Alexandre Perrin, Romain Tartière, Julien Laffaye,
Glen Barber, John Marino, Alex Kozlov, Roman Naumann, Sofian Brabez
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:03:44PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please note flex/lex was updated to 2.5.37 from flex.sourceforge.net and
> __FreeBSD_version was bumped to 133.
>
> FYI, I added couple of compatibility shims (just enough to bui
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:44:43PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > As anyone been able to test this patch?
>
> I've been running with it for a few days. I've done a reinstall of all ports
> plus
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:10:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:56:10PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:10, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Well, I have no idea why an NFS server would reply errno 70
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:59:25PM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Neel Natu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running HEAD and recently started getting errors on pkg_add.
> >
> > uname: 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #103 r249396M: Thu Apr 11 23:25:06
> > PD
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:56:10PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:10, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Well, I have no idea why an NFS server would reply errno 70 if the file
> > still exists, unless the client has somehow sent a bogus file handle
> > to the server. (I am not a
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:44:01AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > First, I think you can recover your database.
>
> that would be great.
>
> > Can you try the following command:
> >
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:52:52AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 0:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Will you be able to test it?
>
> yes. (But I will be traveling for the next two weeks and so the turnaround
> may be a bit longer than norm
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:09:42AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:02, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > This can usually happen when a user do not have the nfs lock system started.
> > Are you sure that nfs lock is correctly started?
>
> wit
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:42:30AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on a diskless server, I keep the ports tree and pkgng databases on a newnfs
> NFSv4 mount. After a bunch of "portmaster -a" runs, the pkgng sqlite database
> appears to get corrupted. For example, when I try to update an exi
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:55:20PM +, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2013 16:52, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote:
> > I want to import libyaml into base as libbsdyml so that no ports will use
> it
> > like we do for expat.
> >
> > I need it for the pk
hi,
I want to import libyaml into base as libbsdyml so that no ports will use it
like we do for expat.
I need it for the pkg bootstrap, so it it can parse pkg.conf.
I know that some of the bhyve people will also be glad to use it.
libyaml is MIT licensed, it is stable: no abi/api revolution in
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:46:41PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Especially on -CURRENT, it's not going to be uncommon
> to see things like this:
>
> The package management tool is not yet installed on your system.
> Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y
> Bootstrapping pkg please wait
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:34:18PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I'm working on tools to build ARM system images.
> Usually, these tools run on x86, which creates a problem
> for packages.
First Yes cross-installation of packages is something we highly want in pkgng
and is plan since the beginning,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 09:46:41PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Especially on -CURRENT, it's not going to be uncommon
> to see things like this:
>
> The package management tool is not yet installed on your system.
> Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y
> Bootstrapping pkg please wait
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:59:02AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-12-26 00:13, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > for whatever reason, I get a Failed assertion error if I add a user to
> > the wheel group... but if I do not add to the wheel group all is
> > fine..
>
> > :
> > /usr/src/lib/lib
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > With (WITH_GCC) gcc47 I've successfully built and I'm running
> > libreoffice after icu bump.
>
> just to be clear, what exactly do you put in /etc/make.conf to build
> all ports with GCC on a fresh install of HEAD?
> is it simpl
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:37:45PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > My original complaint that /etc/group gets permissions of 0600 is a result
> > of a bug in libutil, which bapt@ ported pw to use in r242349. The new
> > group manipulati
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:41:31AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 2 ноября 2012 г., 23:24:28:
>
> BD>> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system
> or find
> BD>> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install
> tools.
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:41:31AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Lev.
> You wrote 2 ноября 2012 г., 23:24:28:
>
> BD>> Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system
> or find
> BD>> instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install
> tools.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:11:22PM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:31:49PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Yes there is http://pkg.FreeBSD.org (no website in there no need to try to
> > there) which will point you to pkgbeta.freebsd.org wher
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:25:08PM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:44:21PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
> > concerned by the announce.
> >
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:52:45PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
> > concerned by the announce.
> >
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:42:39AM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 10/10/12, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > From: Glen Barber
> > Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng
> > To: "Baptiste Daroussin"
> > Cc: po...
Hi all,
If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
concerned by the announce.
As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
ports tree as been switch by default to use pkgng on FreeBSD Current based on
version >= 117 which was the v
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:33:55AM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here are the results
> >
> > # pmccontrol -L
> > SOFT
> >CLOCK.STAT
> >CLOCK.HARD
> >LOCK.FAILED
> >PAGE_FAULT.WRITE
> >PAGE_FAULT.READ
> >PAGE_FAULT.ALL
> >
> Seem
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Davide Italiano wrote:
> [trimming old mails]
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here are the results
> >
> > # pmccontrol -L
> > SOFT
> > CLOCK.STAT
> > CLOCK.HARD
> > LOCK.FAILED
> > PAGE_FAULT.WRITE
> > PAGE_FAULT.READ
> >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>
> Le 3 sept. 2012 à 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
>
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >> Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridg
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridge support to hwpmc(9).
> The patch also support offcore RSP token for Sandy Bridge.
> Note: No uncore support.
>
> Tested on:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1265L V2 @ 2.50GHz (2494.35-
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, Au
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
> >>>
>
> I agree with John on all counts here. Further, the idea of a
> self-i
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:33:09PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:19:59PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
> >> I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which
&
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
> > I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does
> > much the same thing as pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in
> > the pkgng database rather
Thank you,
Would you mind adding create a patch against the git tree of pkgng so that we
can include your script into the scripts subdirectory, so that we provide your
script along with the next pkg 1.0.1 as a contributed script?
regards,
Bapt
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:19:59PM -0600, John Niels
Hi all,
Since Julien Laffaye and I started pkgng lots of things has happened and here we
are now.
After 2 years of development (first commit "Tue Sep 7 2010"), more than 2000
commits, 43 different contibutors. The pkgng team is proud to release pkg-1.0!
Before going further I would like to than
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 05:58, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > The is the longer plan but this with also true with pkg_add -r, and the pkg
> > bootstrap may it be pkg-bootstrap or /usr/sbin/pkg. We have been discussing
>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/25/2012 02:49, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > True. But when you create jails without the installer, you have to
> > install pkgng by hand.
>
> Just like all the other ports you have to install in a jail.
>
>
> --
>
> I am on
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:34:43PM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> > On 08/24/2012 07:01 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Can anyone give me he details on the security related problem?
>
> > Off the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:38:33PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 8/24/2012 1:15 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > BTW for people who haven't tested and want to share their opinion,
> > here is how work /usr/sbin/
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:50:30AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/24/2012 9:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:23:47PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> >> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
> >>
> >>> On of the thing I forgot and kan
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:23:47PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>
> > On of the thing I forgot and kan@ has added is a prompt for the user in
> > case it
> > is going to bootstrap.
>
> So, removing the prompt will make everybody happy
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:19:57PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
> /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
> confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
> is ru
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:19:57PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
> /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
> confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
> is ru
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:50:11PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> >>> I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation
> >>> o
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > portmaster or via core dumping install. By installing on one box,
> > my home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install and
> > mtree didn't coredump and it worked - and this procedure rescued me.
> > But on my lab's
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of majo
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > 1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be
> > able to have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE
>
> I think it would fit better with histor
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:47:36AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits
> >> the
&g
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17:36AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
> > schedule.
>
> Um, no?
>
> Until pkg becomes mandatory (which can'
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:26:43PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi Baptise,
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:43:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> > Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0,
> > I'll
> > give
Hi all,
Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0, I'll
give more details on the release commit bit :) this is planned for 30th august
2012.
Current was supposed to switch to pkgng by default today, it has been delayed
until the nvidia-driver is fixed with pkgng. Th
Hi,
[...]
>
> The plan is to switch the ports tree to pkgng on CURRENT by default on July
> 25th
> No dates are planned yet for other branches.
>
> Note that there will be a NO_PKGNG knob for some time (undefined yet) for
> people
> not will to switch on July 25th
>
[...]
Because I won't hav
t; attempt to get information.
>
> On 07/12/2012 03:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> In the time that you have been working on this project I have asked
> numerous times for you(pl.) to answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What are the goals for pkg?
The why part of th
Hi,
On behalf of the pkgng team I'm really pleased to announce pkg 1.0 RC1 (aka
pkgng)
Only bug fixes will be accepted in the RC phase.
What is pkg
---
pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for
the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary package ma
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote:
> > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow.
> > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now.
> >
>
>
> We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64)
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:53:58AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
> I'm not (only) pointing finger and whining, but
> maybe PC-BSD could relegate someone permanently
> to help you with libreoffice, if indeed desktop is
> so important to them?
>
> I'm not sure how exactly PC-BSD and iXsystems are
> rela
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:55:37PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote:
> >>
> >> And if a port build is broken then the maintainer needs to fix it, that
> >> is the solution.
>
> Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ...
LibreOffice is not a small port, I m
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Hmm... Speaking of libreoffice
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/vcl/prj
>
> ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabbl
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Has anyone answered the original question? Are there going to be
> packages for libreoffice? If not, why not?
>
> Doug
Yes as soon as pointyhat builds are uploaded.
For example there are libreoffice packages on http://pkgbeta.freebsd
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:00:12AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Daniel Nebdal writes:
>
> > >> Making: libuno_sal.so.3
> > >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
> > ../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found
> > >> dmake: Error code 1, while maki
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >> Daniel Nebdal writes:
> >> > >
> >> > >
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Daniel Nebdal writes:
> > >
> > > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
> > > return to
> > >
> > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2,
> > > and run "make",
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well fo
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> > 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
>
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:01:19PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Since LibreOf
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> > 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> >
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different boxes,
> all failing compiling the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-
Hi,
On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9
- changes:
* query -f has been replaced by query -F when querying a package (file) for
consistency with pkg info
* fix autoremove recursion
* pkg set -o oldorigin:neworigin allow the user to modify the origin of a
packages (use
301 - 400 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
