On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
I am going to respond to this before I forget
I had the SAME exact LOR's with ath 9300 and I reported them,
however I have since switched out motherboards and the LOR's have strangely
diapered
here is a full
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
In the last 12 hours I've had 4 crashes related to ZFS.
total 97
-rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 136488 Aug 11 11:17 core.txt.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 117213 Aug 11 11:17 core.txt.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 ler ler 120357 Aug 11 11:17
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:13 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
I first noticed this on my laptop on 08 Aug, after having built booted
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #975 r253985M/253985:141: Tue Aug 6 05:28:39 PDT
2013 root@localhost:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:01 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:30:15AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
...
Booting...
GDB: no debug ports present
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
This (and maybe more?) events are applicable to both the sandy bridge and
sandy bridge xeon CPUs.
This is from the Intel SDM June 2013 Volume #3.
David/Jim, does this look fine to you?
Thanks,
ndex:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:18:48 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/21 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Monday,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:29 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:53:12 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 2:27:58 am Vitja Makarov wrote:
2013/8/22 John Baldwin j
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/23 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It
would be much more important to implement high-precision timeouts for
select() and friends, if it's
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 24.08.2013 00:54, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like to commit this to -10. It migrates the if_lagg locking
from a rw lock to a rm lock. We see a bit of contention
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:05:06 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote:
Please consider the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/8/23 Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org:
I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It
would be much more
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sean Bruno sean_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
Our yBSD builder needs to mount a disk image temporarily that has a
dos partition (for openstack-ish things) to put configs into it. It
seems that under high stress, we can squeeze a panic out of it in
namei().
Sean
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Sean Bruno sean_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 17:05 +0200, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sean Bruno sean_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
Our yBSD builder needs to mount a disk image temporarily that has a
dos partition
Thanks Gleb.
I've removed DIAGNOSTIC and the problem is gone now.
JFYI, I hit this problem today as well. I don't think you really need
to disable DIAGNOSTIC completely in order to get rid of that.
I've noticed Peter Holm has recently committed a new sysctl that
allows you to selectively
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:51 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:08:25 -0500
Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/21/2013 7:06 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/21/2013 11:18 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 09/21/13 09:41, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:51 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:08:25 -0500
Bryan Drewery
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:23:47PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I'm seeing this panic pretty consistently when I try to do a buildworld on
r255764 (i386):
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:11:30AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:23:47PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I'm seeing
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Its definatly not related to GCC, I'm getting the same while trying to
buildkernel, I'm trying to upgrade to a more recent current version! Same
kernel panic is showing...
No one else had this problem yet?
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Miguel C. miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hum, its probably best to take a scrennshot since I can't copy this from
the console!
attaching the file
That was a regression I introduced, but I'm confident r255788 fixed
the issue. Please update your sources and
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.comwrote:
I sent the mail again to the list in a smaller size, the first one was
huge ...
Anyway that's the revision I'm trying to build -- r255788 ... but the
problem is, I can't buildkernel, I get a panic while doing it... so
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion but I would have tried it If r255788 or newer was
there but its not the case!
I also checked
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/amd64/10.0-CURRENT/ but
kernel.txz seems
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
FreeBSD mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk 10.0-ALPHA2 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA2 #8 r255811:
Tue Sep 24 09:04:17 BST 2013
r...@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UZI ia64
panic: deadlkres: possible deadlock
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From davide.itali...@gmail.com Wed Sep 25 16:12:47 2013
Can you please paste the output of 'show locks', 'show alllocks',
'show lockedvnods' at least?
Ideally you should provide all the informations listed here.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
Regarding textdump(4), I'm not clear where the following
scripts should be located and used:
[snip]
Are these ddb(8) commands? Or do I set these in /etc/rc.conf?
The scripts (quotes unneeded) should be located in
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
Can someone help me? :)
[trim]
=== usr.bin/clang/tblgen (obj,depend,all,install)
...
c++ -O2 -pipe
-I/zbuilder/vm4all/src-stable-9-clone/usr.bin/clang/tblgen/../../../contrib/llvm/include
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From davide.itali...@gmail.com Thu Sep 26 13:12:30 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
Regarding textdump(4), I'm not clear where the following
scripts should be located
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
From davide.itali...@gmail.com Fri Oct 11 15:39:49 2013
If you're not able to get a full dump, a textdump would be enough.
In your DDB scripts just remove the 'call doadump' step and you should
be done, unless I'm
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
Anyway, savecore eventually deadlocks:
panic: deadlkres: possible deadlock detected for 0xe000127b7b00, blocked
for 901401 ticks
[trim]
Tracing command savecore pid 805 tid 100079 td 0xe000127b7b00
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote:
I'm trying to set up textdump(4).
On boot I see:
WITNESS: unable to allocate a new witness object
also
It means that you run out of WITNESS object on the free list.
Expensive timeout(9) function:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
Before I begin, I appreciate any help/comments/criticism. Please, don't
hesitate to support this topic.
Some time ago I've announced new project - of creating rolling images of
FreeBSD from SVN.
Along
Good evening folks.
During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture
supported was Westmere.
Testing is appreciated, in order to see if there's something that have
to be fixed.
You can find the diff here:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening folks.
During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture
supported was Westmere.
Testing is appreciated
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano davide.itali...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening folks.
During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support
...@freebsd.org:
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano davide.itali...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening folks.
During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor
Hi hackers,
I've taken a closer look to iap_event_westmere_ok_on_counter() and
comparing the code with the intel documentation it seems that some
events some events valid only on 0-1 counter are not listed. Maybe I'm
missing somethin', so please point me out. Otherwise, there's a patch
that
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 03:45:36PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
i've been playing with clang tot and noticed the following error:
/usr/local/bin/clang -c -O3 -pipe -fno-inline-functions -fno-strict-aliasing
-march=core2
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Fabien Thomas fabien.tho...@netasq.com wrote:
Le 3 sept. 2012 à 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi,
Find a patch that add Intel Ivy Bridge support to hwpmc(9).
The patch also support
[trimming old mails]
Hi,
here are the results
# pmccontrol -L
SOFT
CLOCK.STAT
CLOCK.HARD
LOCK.FAILED
PAGE_FAULT.WRITE
PAGE_FAULT.READ
PAGE_FAULT.ALL
# pmcstat -SOFF_CORE_RESPONSE_0,rsp=REQ_DMND_DATA_RD+RES_ANY -w1 -T
pmcstat: ERROR:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD?
On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday
(GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v:
9.1:
65 cpu0:timer
10 cpu1:timer
HEAD:
On Nov 4, 2012 10:40 PM, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD?
On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday
Hi.
This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
implementation. The main objective of this work is making the
subsystem tickless. In the last several years, this possibility has
been discussed widely (http://markmail.org/message/q3xmr2ttlzpqkmae),
but until now noone really
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi.
This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
implementation. The main objective of this work is making the
subsystem tickless
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi.
This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI
, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi.
This patch takes callout
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Can you please test with MIPS? David has a MIPS board now.
Quoting from my first mail -- We tested the code on amd64, MIPS and arm.
I used the board you gave to me. I run only some basic tests, but I
can look forward
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mark Johnston mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated patch for
HEAD, that
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
[addressing the various items separately]
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:57:36PM +0100, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
...
- for several functions the only
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:39 PM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:13:26PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 15.12.2012 23:03, Alexander Motin wrote:
Sorry, it's my fault. I've tried to save some time on patch generation
and forgot about that change in lib/.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 1355873265.1198.183.ca...@revolution.hippie.lan, Ian Lepore
writes
:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 23:58 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I'm not so sure about the 2^k precision. You speak of seconds, but I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message
CACYV=-eg542ihm9kfujpvczzra4tqepebva8rzt1yohncgf...@mail.gmail.com
, Davide Italiano writes:
Right now -- the precision is specified in 'bintime
dropping phk _AT_ onelab2 _DOT_ something from CC as long as it
doesn't seem a valid mail address and I'm annoyed mails bounce back.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Bruce Evans
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 04:13:43PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
I grabbed testsleep.c to test an arm event timer implementation, and had
to fix a couple nits... kqueueto was missing from the names[] array, and
I had to
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:58 AM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried to update hwpmc by adding support for xeon class of Ivy
bridge processors.
Thanks Jim for pointing me to the correct document. (325462-045US Jan 2013)
I do not have a reference machine to test
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:29 AM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:27 PM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:58 AM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried to update hwpmc by adding
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:17 AM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared a patch to add core and uncore events support for
haswell processor.
I do not have the hardware to test this. It applies cleanly and
compiles fine though.
[trimmed old mails]
Here's a new version of the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/patches/calloutng-11022012.diff
Significant bits changed (after wider discussion and suggestion by phk@):
- Introduction of the new sbintime_t type (32.32 fixed point) with the
respective conversion
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote:
With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit.
At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this
up.
Can p_flag be bumped up to u_long?
Index: proc.h
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@qxnitro.org wrote:
Hey,
I think r246916 broke the build. I get the following when building amd64
kernel:
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g
-Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org writes:
Unfortunately tinderbox didn't catch this bug because it's triggered
only when gcc is used to build kernel.
In this particular case, the broken code is only built on platforms
The patch has been splitted in smaller logical chunks in order to
improve readability and facilitate review.
The whole code can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/calloutng_split/
In particular:
http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/calloutng_split/sbintime.diff brings
the new type
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Pawel Pekala pa...@freebsd.org wrote:
For some time now (about month?) ports using sys/time.h include fail to
build and I`m sure they were building ok before. At least those seems
affected by this:
math/atlas
math/openblas
x11-toolkits/c++-gtk-utils
All
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/modules/hwpmc/../../dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_core.c: In function
'iap_allocate_pmc':
/usr/src/sys/modules/hwpmc/../../dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_core.c:1935: warning: 'map'
may be used
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2013-05-02 12:06, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/modules/hwpmc/../../dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_core.c: In function
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02.05.2013 14:06, Davide Italiano wrote:
/usr/src/sys/modules/hwpmc/../../dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_core.c:1935: warning:
'map' may be used uninitialized in this function
*** [hwpmc_core.o] Error code 1
You can find a patch
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened with other drivers. This is mainly because we
Hi. I've been recently upgraded to -CURRENT (9.0).
After
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# make install kernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
I have rebooted to single-user mode, as suggested in the documentation.
No more wireless connection. I've a intel 2200 bg wireless card,
running
On 03/09/10 08:32, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Friday, September 03, 2010 01:34:54 Davide Italiano wrote:
Hi. I've been recently upgraded to -CURRENT (9.0).
After
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
# make install kernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
I have rebooted to single
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I see no point to have it in usr/bin.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
r258695 introduces a sanity check for makefs in order to verify that
minimum image size specified is always less than maximum image size.
If makefs(1) is invoked specifying minimum image size, but not maximum
one, the program exits with an error. Example:
# sudo -E makefs -M 538968064 -B be
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20
Currently, the following is allowed in FreeBSD:
root@rabbit1:/home/davide/udp-clt # sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters=2147483647
kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 2036598 - -2147483648
The following is an attempt of fixing.
I also think nmbcluster should actually be u_int and not it, but this
is a discussion for
Hi,
one of the first things I do when I install FreeBSD is to switch the
default PAGER from more(1) to less(1). This is particularly
convenient, e.g. while using git diff, to show something more
readable.
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why more(1) is still the
default, and/or is this
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote:
The PAGER was less for about half a year and reverted. Please see:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=242643
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
I get the following panic on current svn ver r280793:
Revert to r280784. This should fix.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
Upgraded my router today, because it was approaching the 24 uptime days
of doom
Now, it likes to die on me, a lot
The bt you posted suggest this could be stack overflow, probably due
to infinite recursion.
Also, as a
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi;
I guess I see the following options:
1) Just leave GNU RCS in the tree.
2) Improve OpenRCS so it can be swapped in.
3) Remove RCS dependencies from other parts of the tree (e.g.
etcupdate)
and
79 matches
Mail list logo
