< said:
> Interested persons should review the diffs and pipe up if they have
> some passionate argument argument against them.
Patches look mostly fine.
> Also, I should point out that while if_vlan provides the necessary
> kernel hackery to implement VLANs, there isn't any user space utility
>
< said:
> Is it possible to load kernel modules that are supposed
> to operate on pci devices?
Not yet. There are several of us who have worked on parts of this
problem in the past, but we're not there yet. Join
new-bus-a...@bostonradio.org if you are interested in helping out.
-GAWollman
--
<
said:
> the PCI1200 PCI/Cardbus bridge (used in the Dell Inspiron
> 7000), however they cannot seem to understand that I'm not
> asking for a pre-written device driver :-(
You have to talk to the right part of TI, and you have to know what to
ask for. I have the book for the PCI1131, which
< said:
> The trouble is Doug, that until there IS a developer's guide, the only
> person capable if moving PCI and ISA to your scheme, is you.
> and as you pointed out.. you're short of time right now..
No, there are more people than just Doug. Certainly me (if I had
time), Nicolas (if he had t
< said:
> Where did the "-C" option for install(1) come from? bde pick up on
> somethings I did a long time ago.
Uh, no, wrong. (Speaking as the creator of `install -C'.)
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O S
< said:
> union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
> trying to get them to work.
> Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
> -o union type of mount
That is a union mount. Which is it -- broken or not?
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Woll
< said:
>> A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
>> which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
>> the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
> Union mounts do not work, and I believe they are some distance from
> working (unless you have better patches th
<
said:
> The issue, as I understand it, is to get a reply from an unknown server
> (who has an IP address), while you have no IP address.
You also have to send a packet *from* 0.0.0.0 (since you have no IP
address). I'm almost irritated enough to consider fixing this this
week.
-GAWollman
< said:
> So, we'll import a pop server, apache, g77, ad nauseam
> to increase the credibility of FreeBSD as a workstation OS.
None of those things are required to get a machine onto the network.
DHCP is, in a large and growing number of places.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We
< said:
> to compare 0 bytes worth of data and returns success). In my opinion,
> this is a bug: either the equal() macro should return false, or the
> zero length field should be detected by a sanity check and the function
> should return EINVAL.
OK, I'll agree that this is a bug.
-GAWollman
-
< said:
> a struct sockaddr_dl will be used. However, the user is supposed to
> pass the address using a struct ifreq, and struct ifreq uses struct
> sockaddr, not struct sockaddr_dl.
This is called ``poor man's inheritance''.
I believe it is an error for any code to use AF_UNSPEC for any purpos
< said:
> Erm, I haven't tried it between 3.0 and 3.0 boxes because all my test
> environments currently involve one of each (4.0 and 3.0), but I can
> certainly say that in none of these test environments does amd work at
> all.
Works just fine on a somewhat older 3.0 (which is still running the
<
said:
> sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :)
> Use the options:
> options "P1003_1B"
> options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING"
> options "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L"
Peter: is there any harm in enabling these features permanently?
-GAWoll
< said:
> If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and
> sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that
> emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally
> duplicating those routines inside the emulator (like I did with
> sendit() a
< said:
> Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80
> characters?
Probably almost anyone who uses the default settings.
Many people like to be able to see more than one thing on the desktop
at a time. Even with a 1280x1024 display on a good 19-inch monitor, I
still can't
< said:
> | COMPATIBILITY
> | The rm utility differs from historical implementations in that
> | the -f option only masks attempts to remove non-existent
> | files instead of masking a large variety of errors.
I went down to our reading room and examined 1003.2. It says quite
clea
<
said:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> I'll support that. The example given in style(9):
>>
>> a = b->c[0] + ~d == (e || f) || g && h ? i : j >> 1;
>>
>> should rate as an entry in the Obfuscated C competition rather than
>> an example of maintainable code.
> As a matter of fact, what's the rea
< said:
> It's not clear to me, when thinking of introducing a new file (say, for
> auditing support :), what I should name it. Would it be kern_audit.c or
> sys_audit.c?
Depends on what it is auditing. If it only auditing the basic I/O
operations, then it would go in sys_*.c. If it's a more g
<
said:
> Please do go ahead and update it.. the experts agree!
I haven't seen any experts involved in this discussion yet. It's
probably after bedtime down there in oz.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem
< said:
> i asked Dennis Ritchie his opinion of "the right behavior"
The right behavior of what?
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
<
said:
> A lot of people use a lot of things out of ports. Why should Fortran
> be different?
Because Berkeley Unix has /always/ included a FORTRAN compiler.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fire
< said:
> the problem is that i don't know how well unionfs works, and i don't
> have the ability to fix it.
Please keep in mind that there are two *different* entiries being
discussed here:
1) mount -o union
2) mount -t union (which should really be called `translucentfs').
The former is a ge
< said:
> Strings are a whole lot more portable then integer assignments.
Nonsense. Strings are not portable at all -- they only exist in
FreeBSD. The reference implementation (4.4BSD) and its other
descendants use numbers.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family /
< said:
> Backwards compatibility is one thing, but new nodes should be named,
> not numbered. OID_AUTO is bogus because it perpetuates the numbering
> of nodes.
Nonsense. There are plenty of contexts in which a number makes far
more sense than a name -- pretty much anything in any network st
<
said:
> Peter pointed out that having the sysctl's as symbols was a nice
> advantage of the current system. How important is this?
I don't think it's important at all. (Then again, I liked the old
system.)
> If we were willing to give this up, then the SYSCTL() macro could
> just expand to a
<
said:
> I ran into an interesting problem in the process of modifying
> "netstat" to understand the PF_NETGRAPH protocol family. "netstat"
> uses kvm_read(), etc. to read kernel symbols. However, this doesn't
Don't do that. Use sysctl, that's what it's there for.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wo
<
said:
> Where's struct kvm_swap and typedef struct kvm_swap *kvm_swap_t supposed to
> now be?
Hopefully the latter isn't anywhere, since style(9) says very
specifically that such typedefs are Not To Be Introduced.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We'
< said:
> Hmm, good point. So I still need to find a way to start up rc5des, it seems
> that rc5des installs a SIGHUP handler and therefore nohup is
> useless.
Bug the authors to fix it? daemon(3) is provided for a reason!
Here's my version of a simple daemonizing program Neither
TIOCNOTT
< said:
> root cron 2180 - -none-
> root cron 2181 - -none-
> root cron 2182 - -none-
> root adjkerntz 400 - -none-
> root adjkerntz 401 -
< said:
> Curious, why is the reply field in the email header not set
> to the originating mailing list?
Because that would be an incredibly obnoxious (I would even say
asinine) thing to do. If I want to make a reply to the list, I'll
make a reply to the list. If I don't, I won't. Readers of
501 - 530 of 530 matches
Mail list logo