Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-24 Thread Gary Schrock

At 10:59 PM 9/24/99 +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
As Gary Schrock wrote ...
  all mail would still have to go through the local isp's.  Personally, I
  would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
  behavior on their part.  I use the mail server at work for all my outgoing
  mail.  Why?  Because the machine is lightly loaded and I don't have to

So, the mailserver at your workplace is an open relay?

No, it's definitely not.  I've been using a pop before relay scheme that's 
been working fairly nicely.  (Although occaisionally the server gets stuck 
in a state where it decides it doesn't recognize my pop check and refuses 
to relay my mail anyways).  Back before sendmail started doing relay 
checking by default, I got hit with a spammer relay that so swamped the 
server it was immediately noticeable because nothing else was 
working.  I've been very careful ever since then to make sure servers I'm 
responsible for don't leave relaying open.  (As a defense, this was back 
when this was something that was still relatively new, and there wasn't a 
whole lot in the way of information about preventing relaying.  These day's 
it's a lot easier to fix that problem).

  worry about my mail getting lost in the depths of my isp's mail server for
  a couple hours because their loads tend to run high.  (Hell, I don't
  generally even use the email account provided by the local isp because of
  load issues, my work account is so much more reliable).

I'd call this the ultimate reason to get another ISP. Not the relaying
stuff.

Why?  The last thing I need is another email account, so I don't even *use* 
the email stuff from my isp.  For everything besides occaisional issues 
with the load on their mail servers my isp is pretty good.  However, for me 
it makes a lot more sense to use hte mail server at work, simply because 
that's a machine that's got few users, and I get the instant gratification 
of my mail going out immediately.

For what it's worth, to clarify my viewpoint on this issue, I don't really 
object to the DUL, and quite honestly, after reading the information about 
it, I might even consider enabling it.  It's not something that will affect 
my mail, because I *do* send the mail through a legit mail server.  My 
objection is with the idea that an ISP would block my ability to use my 
mail host at work by blocking outside access through port 25.  Why should 
my mail take an hour or two to filter through the local isp when it can go 
immediately through work?  (And for the argument choose an isp that has a 
better mail relayer, that's not always practical.  Say you're using adsl or 
cable modem, where you might not really have a choice on the isp, are you 
really going to give up the faster connection because a mail relay you 
don't use happens to be slow?  I sure as hell wouldn't).




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-12 Thread Gary Schrock

At 04:02 PM 8/12/2000 -0700, you wrote:
hetzels Sendmail 8.11 has the ablity to due secure authentication with
hetzels mail clients when compiled with Cyrus-SASL.

hetzels Will the Cyrus-SASL library be imported to provide this
hetzels capability?  Or at least a make.conf variable.

My first step in the process was to get sendmail up-to-date.  Once it is
MFC'ed to STABLE, I'll look at enhancements.  After September 21, I want to
turn on STARTTLS support.  I'm not sure about importing SASL -- I might be
convinced to put in Makefile support if it happens to already been
installed via ports.

I'll admit that I'm something of a clueless idiot when it comes to 
something like STARTTLS, but looking at the stuff on sendmails page about 
it, I don't really see a listing of clients that it can work with.  One 
advantage of the SASL stuff is that a fair number of clients seem to 
support the thing, including several for windows (yeah, I know, the evil 
term, but some of us actually have people that use windows clients to do 
their mail).  Now, maybe I just don't know what magic STARTTLS offers me, 
and I'd convert if I knew better.

Gary Schrock



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message