Re: Problem pulling particular directory from CVS

2002-11-29 Thread Mike Bristow

On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 11:34  pm, Paul A. Scott wrote:

Oh, #$%@. I'm so embarrassed. My terminal session was logged into Mac 
OSX
not FreeBSD, and I had mirrored the same directory structure, so I faked
myself out.

Bottom line is, cvs on Freebsd works like a champ. The cvs on MacOSX 
does
not. My mistake. And I humbly appolgize for the stupid user error.

CVS works just fine - it's just that the filesystem is case insensitive 
[1],
so when you check out src/contrib, the distinction between 
src/contrib/CVS [2]
src/contrib/cvs is lost, and Bad Shit happens.

Try using Disk Copy to setup and mount a blank (UFS) image, or having a 
separate
UFS partition.

[1] Unless your filesystem is UFS, rather than HFS+, in which case 
you'll have
lots of interesting other problmes.
[2] CVS keeps a shedload of metadata here

--
Am I getting older, or are these shows getting more entertaining?
-- Flash, on Children in Need.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libstand ext2fs

2000-05-02 Thread Mike Bristow

On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:08:02PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
   What sort of fallback behaviour would you want in case of error here?  
  
  Just let chroot() either succeed or fail.  It's own "fallback behavior"
  in such a case should prove adequate. :)
 
 Hmm.  Failure to chroot == failure to start init?

If Linux emulation is non modular, what happens if /sbin/init is a linux
binary?

I admit to being tempted to find out exactly how good Linux emulation
is...  

-- 
Mike Bristow, seebitwopie  


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: ports /work/ directory.

2000-06-16 Thread Mike Bristow

On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 11:59:18AM -0400, Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote:
 Is there any plans to move the ports' working directory out of the
 /usr/ports/ tree?

Look at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk; in particular WRKDIRPREFIX.

Setting it in /etc/make.conf seems sensible, perhaps
WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/ports/`hostname` 
or
WRKDIRPREFIX=/disks/big-fast-disk/ports-build

as approprate

-- 
Mike Bristow, seebitwopie  


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: SB Live (or RAM parity?) crash on today's -CURRENT

2000-07-14 Thread Mike Bristow

On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:32:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
 On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Thomas Stromberg wrote:
 
  'panic: RAM parity error, likely hardware failure.'
  
  This one had me confused at first, because it blamed a RAM parity
  error. As this is a brand new machine (Gateway GP-800), so I first thought
  I got a bad batch. Then I realized this only happens with apps that try to
  do sound stuff.
 
   This is a known problem with all PCI sound cards. It happens most
 often with ECC ram, but it also happens without. What kind of NIC do you
 have, and specifically, is it a PCI card or ISA? We're trying to track
 that bit down too. 

I see it with:
mike@gurgle:~$ dmesg | grep vr0
vr0: VIA VT3043 Rhine I 10/100BaseTX port 0xb000-0xb07f mem 0xdf80-0xdf80007f 
irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0

The machine does have ECC ram.  If you need more, let me know and I'll give
you what you need... 

-- 
Mike Bristow, seebitwopie  


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: help! 5.1 doesn't do the rc thing?

2003-08-07 Thread Mike Bristow
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:49:00AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
 Yes, of course :)
 That's why I'm perplexed. I let it install the files it wanted to,
 except for obvious things I didn't want overwritten: passwd file,
 sendmail config, etc.
 
 Just to verify: my old rc.conf should be read (and honored) right?

Yes.  But it may contain bogosity; what does . /etc/rc.conf do?
What's in /etc/rc.conf?  

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Mike Bristow

On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:36:26PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
 All these solutions assume that everyone is wired up with IP
 connectivity. The original questions was who uses UUCP?

Me.

 UUCP has many valid uses. Even today. If you don't understand the
 software, that's fine with me. Just don't use your ignorance as
 an excuse to dike the software out. Or more precisely, admit
 you want to rip the code out because you don't understand what
 it is, rather than making up specious excuses for it's removal.

I support it's removal, because I think that software that is used
by a tiny fraction of the userbase (and I suspect that uucp fits
into that catagory) should be removed from the core distribution,
and made into a seperate package; provided that obtaining the 
package and integrating it into FreeBSD is not too onerous.

-- 
Mike Bristow, seebitwopie  

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: ** HEADS UP **

2001-03-19 Thread Mike Bristow

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:13:09AM -0600, Peter Schultz wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
  I committed a miibus'ified fxp driver to the tree today, and made
  it the default.  If you compile fxp into your kernel statically,
  you will also need "device miibus" as well, if it isn't there already.
  
  If you notice any problems with the driver (things that were working
  and are not working now), please let me know.  If you happend to have
  a chip that did _NOT_ work but now DOES work, please boot the machine
  with -v, and send me the line that says "PCI IDs:".
  
  If you have a fxp device that still doesn't work, then please get
  in touch with me (and send the output of the line above).
  --
  Jonathan
  
 Hi Jonathan,
 
 I've got a slight problem in that it is not correctly auto detecting
 the media type.  It should be setting itself to 10baseT/UTP.  I'm
 running DHCP on my -current machine and I'm not sure how to set it
 so that it configures the interface correctly.  It previously "just
 worked" without any special media settings.  Is there something I
 can provide to help correct this?

something like:

interface "fxp0" {
media "media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex";
}

in /etc/dhclient.conf will make dhclient DTRT when ifconfig ing the
interface.  Of course, that means that you're forcing the 
interface to be 100meg (which won't work when you plug your
laptop in $CLIENT's 10 meg hub)

-- 
Mike Bristow, seebitwopie  

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Make world problems

2000-02-01 Thread Mike Bristow

On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:34:51AM +0100, Marc Schneiders wrote:
 As far as this is possible for me in rather heterogenous threads, I've
 tried to follow the messages about recent make world problems. I've
 done exactly what is in src/UPDATING (and like another poster here I
 did *not* get the 24/01/2000 message until today...): build and
 install (x)install, make buildworld, installworld, distrib dirs,
 kernel. 
 Some problems have disappeared, some remain, to wit:
 
 /kernel: cmd ntpd pid 86 tried to use non-present sched_get_priority_max 
 /kernel: cmd ntpd pid 86 tried to use non-present sched_setscheduler
 ntpd [86]: sched_setscheduler(): Function not implemented

This shouldn't (IIR comments to this list C) affect ntp, but if you
want the nasty messages to go away, include:

options P1003_1B
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L

in your kernel config.

-- 
Mike Bristow, Geek At Large  ``Beware of Invisible Cows''


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: [HEADSUP] making /bin/sh the default shell for root

2021-09-23 Thread Mike Bristow
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:00:49AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote:
> +1 for keeping this behavior on default config

-1 for this.

Things should be as default-as-possible, so that the behaviour of
/bin/sh as root on FreeBSD is unsuprising to someone used to /bin/sh
on other systems or users, because they won't be used to the magic
config.

I have no problem with a section of root's .profile having the
approprate magic commented out so that folk who want this can easily
have it, of course.

Cheers,
Mike


-- 
Mike Bristow  m...@urgle.com