ACPI-0483: *** Error: GPE0 block (GPE 0 to 15) overlaps the GPE1 block
(GPE 0 to 15)
It appears that in your machine's FADT:
1) There is a GPE1 block defined (GPE1_BLK, GPE1_BLK_LEN)
2) The GPE1_BASE is set to zero.
One of these is wrong.
Bob
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSDT=0x3ffbf77
INT_MODEL=PIC
SCI_INT=9
SMI_CMD=0xb1, ACPI_ENABLE=0xf0, ACPI_DISABLE=0xf1, S4BIOS_REQ=0x0
PM1a_EVT_BLK=0x1000-0x1003
PM1a_CNT_BLK=0x1004-0x1005
PM2_CNT_BLK=0x1030-0x1030
PM2_TMR_BLK=0x1008-0x100b
or
GPE1_BLK_LEN is zero, there is no GPE1. Likewise with the GPE0 block.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:00 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; John Baldwin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mitsuru IWASAKI
Subject: [acpi-jp 1965] RE: Call
You'll need to enable the ACPI debug output and send this out so we can get
a better idea of what is going on.
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Emmerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mitsuru IWASAKI
Cc: [EMAIL
The deleted object problem has been fixed in the 20021122 release which
should be available soon, if not already. (I was able to reproduce the
problem with your dsdt on previous releases, and I verified it fixed with
the 11/22 release.)
I did not see any mutex issues -- as we found out on
I think this code is the problem:
Scope(\_TZ_) {
ThermalZone(THRM) {
Name(_AL0, Package(0x1) {
FAN_,
})
The name FAN_ is not defined elsewhere in the namespace.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Seck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday,
TABLE_ID_DSDT was removed because the table ID should be dynamically
allocated. There was a longstanding TBD to remove it.
It appears that there is some issue with this change, and of course we
would like to get to the root of this problem.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Takayoshi
Here's what we released:
#define ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID0x0001
#define ACPI_FIRST_TABLE_ID 0xF000
-Original Message-
From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Takayoshi Kochi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
This looks like the (in)famous implicit return problem that is in some
Toshiba ASL files.
Method(_CRS) {
CRS_(0x10)
}
This does NOT actually return a value and the ASL code is incorrect. It has
to be:
Method(_CRS) {
intended to be the return value of a
function?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grover, Andrew
Subject: Re: [acpi
these kinds of problems creep
into the BIOS AML code.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grover, Andrew
Subject: Re
, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grover, Andrew
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1735] Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20020815
Moore, Robert wrote:
I think you are missing something:
1) BIOS vendor writes ASL
2) BIOS vendor
: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [acpi-jp 1750] Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20020815
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Moore, Robert wrote:
This looks like the (in)famous implicit return problem that is in some
Toshiba ASL files.
Method
Your patches seem to fix three things:
1) Implicit returns
2) Invalid escape sequences (missing double backslashes)
3) Uninitialized Locals
Which one was causing the original problem as reported?
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:h...@selasky.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 8:23 AM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.mo...@intel.com>; Edward Tomasz Napierala
> <tr...@freebsd.org>; O. Hartmann <ohartm...@walstatt.org>
> C
Not sure I understand. The fix has been committed, and is part of version
20161222.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:h...@selasky.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 12:30 AM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.mo...@intel.com>; Edward Toma
We have fixed this issue for the latest version of ACPICA that will happen this
week, probably 22 december.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-a...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> a...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Edward Tomasz Napierala
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016
ACPICA version 20161222 happened today, with a fix for the problem below.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-a...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> a...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Moore, Robert
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 7:21 AM
> To: Edward Tomas
18 matches
Mail list logo
