at /usr/include/machine/ucontext.h, that's not there.. is this the
correct file to be #include'ing?
Is there any additional information I can provide (I noticed a related thread,
but DCS's reply didn't seem to help..)?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L
So where is it breaking? It's either breaking in a Makefile
I missed somewhere, or the pcic code is broken, or I'm
broken (being egotistical, I doubt it ;).
--Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 18-Oct-99 Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will Andrews writes:
: But it doesn't work. I'm assuming that my kernel
: config file's settings do not affect make world in any way,
: and thus it seems that pcic.ko is not being built by make world
: anymore...
What doesn't
d above, a -CURRENT kernel may have problems with a -STABLE world.
I'm honestly not fully aware of the dependencies regarding the signal changes
(i.e., ucontext.h), so my thoughts may be completely wrong. :-)
Comments?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E
On 18-Oct-99 David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 12:25:48PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
If you don't believe me when I say that pcic _was_ working for the Sept. 29
sources:
The pcic modules is *KNOWN* to have and cause problems. Warner told you
this and you still insist on pushing
On 23-Oct-99 Warner Losh wrote:
OK. I managed to get sio and ep working on the plane back from
FreeBSDCon'99. There are some problems with card eject at the moment,
but will be committing things to the tree shortly.
I will be your guinea pig, if you like. :-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
On 23-Oct-99 Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Will Andrews
writes:
: I will be your guinea pig, if you like. :-)
Grab the current patches from
http://www.freebsd.org/~imp/pccard-snap.patch
but read my other posting about the warnings and such.
As of yet, I haven't
Megahertz 574B card removed
I originally was unable to get this card working - it
required IRQ 10, so I had to change the "?" to "10" (my
entry was copied from another 3Com card, don't remember which).
Note: This hasn't been tested with Warner's new pcic code.
I'll be doing that
kernel
tonight, I will let you know what happens...
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/mail/archive/1999/freebsd-current/. Read
ALL the messages.
Oh, and update your -CURRENT. A -CURRENT machine with sources from March 1999
indicates you're not running a machine in sync with the purpose of -CURRENT.
Use -STABLE instead.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C
borked with that too.
/me will check CVS logs tomorrow to see if in one place or
another ep_get_macaddr(), etc. got borked somehow.
Thoughts / Comments?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R
that Mike Smith just fixed (vfs_conf.c, that is).
Or was npx0's assignment changed in a recent commit?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h
to y'all on the MAC address issue. Good night.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:01:59PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
bento should have them but I dont' know how up to date it is.
Bento is returning to 5-CURRENT builds in lieu of DP2 and
hopefully 5.0-RELEASE, now that 4.7-RELEASE is out. I believe
we will do 4-STABLE builds less frequently
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:10:31AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
This will break some commercially available software that
can't easily replaced.
kargl[248] f95 -V a.f90
NAGWare Fortran 95 compiler Release 4.2(468)
Copyright 1990-2002 The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd., Oxford, U.K.
f95comp
becomes -stable)
# cd /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/ssh make clean depend all install
Someone correct me if I'm wrong. :-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e
).
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 10:00:44AM -0500, Kelly Yancey wrote:
This is all beginning to smell a lot like a FTP install.
Exactly. Only thing is, an FTP install requires a usable internet
connection on intended box, which is not always available. ;-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S
minimize the number of root applications listening
on sockets.
This seems like a reasonable change. Thanks for pointing this out! :)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b+
I finally
figured it out 2 days ago. You need to remove your CXXFLAGS definition in
/etc/make.conf, it is conflicting with CXXFLAGS in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:56:08AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
that rapid developer folks can disable it.
ITYM "rabid". And I kinda resent that.. ;-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++
fix this ASAP that would be nice. :)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:36:45AM -0400, Alok K. Dhir wrote:
Totally off topic question that I've wondered for some time now - what
does MFC stand for?
Merge From CURRENT.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 03:30:27PM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
Yes, the developers do a good job of repressing opinions that differ from
their own.
It should be noted that the person who brought this up was a developer.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C
thing like that. :-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
her people are sick of your crap, too. :)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
their prototypes and
have it autogen diffs.
I'm sure perl mavens will say that'll only take about 100 lines of perl.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I agree too, but nobody has written *that* code yet.
Instead of trying to find these yourself, why not invest this time in
writing said script? :)
(I'm not volunteering for this.. ;-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S
be standardized? And maybe a similar method be
integrated into /etc/rc for restarting base system daemons? (Sent to
-current for src hackers' opinions.)
Please continue specific discussion on either of these in their own list,
or if reply is general Cc both.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s
any reason for that to be altered.
Fine, you can quote historical context to argue against doing something
similar to SVR4 init. I, however, see nothing wrong with making it easier
to manage the daemons. Of course, that does not necessarily need to go in
the rc.d scripts.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
boss just laughs
That's to be expected of a company like Yahoo!
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail
above.
Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to
use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:19:21AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
I'd go along with that. What do the other committers think?
Can I drink pop instead? I'm underage, and I don't like alcohol anyway. :)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o
e
``beLoud'' is appropriate in this context. ;-)
Thanks,
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
Index
quit
So it seems there's something quite broken in the code. My suspect is
rev 1.25 of ftp.c and associated commits.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e
purely experimental purposes.. I'd rather leave it in and
get ftp(1) properly fixed, since everything else works just fine. :-)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:58:28PM -0400, bush doctor wrote:
the same port reports none of the warnings :(. Any clues?
Different libc linking in one of the libs.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:27:16PM +0200, Thomas Schuerger wrote:
Is there already a tool that checks the installed ports for available
updates in /usr/ports?
I've written such a tool, which seems to work fine already. Anyone
interested?
pkg_version(1)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED
IPDIVERT
in your kernel?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
wing patch.
Comments?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
Index:
${MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR} instead of
%SUBDIR%. Anyway, I withdraw this patch.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y
be for
EVERYTHING, not just controlling one server. Visigoth could use it for
a short-term solution, but in the long term, I think his solution is
better (in principle, I didn't look at the code).
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E
people are used to the current system; changing it is a
fundamental, non-trivial job. This requires good reasoning.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI
here think this is a good idea? If so, I'd like to
merge this in -CURRENT and MFC before 4.1-RELEASE. It seems like a
fairly nice addition to df(1), and can be useful for system accounting.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:32:11PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
My only suggestion is to put a dashed line above the totals in order to
clearly say they are totals (like I did below).
That might be nice, but I object on the grounds that it isn't consistent
with du -c.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
, this job could be done by shell scripts.. but I think it would
be useful in df(1).
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 10:34:41PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Okay, then. Let me be more specific. How is the notion of "total
space" useful? :-)
Tells you when it's time to get new hard drives?
I guess the originator of the PR should provide a reason. =\
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
with
du(1) too!!"
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G+ e- h! r--+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:01:39PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote:
I've tried various cvsup sites (normally cvsup2 or cvsup16 )
and each site returns this message:
Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded; try again later
I've gotten that before but never with all of the hosts out there.
Hi,
My -CURRENT workstation won't boot off the WD Raptor 36GB disk,
which is on a SiI 3112A SATA-150 controller. This was working
with a kernel in early July. {build,install}{world,kernel}
completed. Fortunately, it seems I can still boot with the
older kernel. I guess ATAng problems still
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 08:48:57PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
My -CURRENT workstation won't boot off the WD Raptor 36GB disk,
which is on a SiI 3112A SATA-150 controller. This was working
with a kernel in early July. {build,install}{world,kernel}
completed. Fortunately, it seems I can still
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:24:07PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, here's what we can do to fix this:
1) Put back -pthread in -current so all the ports don't fail
2) I will build a full set of -current packages with the -pthread
error still in place, to determine the list of packages that
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:12:55AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Because when things break, people fix them. There is no
motivation (as seen in the last 2+ years) to fix something
that isn't broken.
Please also see:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:17:28AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
From what I've recently read, the freeze should be lifting
this week. Can we hold off till then? Is a few more days
going to matter? If the freeze continues longer than expected,
I'll back the change out until it's over.
I
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:35:10PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
[...]
Scott said it all for me. Seriously. The whole idea of breaking
backwards de-facto compatibility is bad, bad, bad.
Regards,
--
wca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this
gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of
determining wether to use threading, than the ports that depend on it.
The qt-using ports
Hello,
With the help of Adriaan de Groot, Andy Fawcett, and Lauri Watts,
I've successfully built KDE on 5.1-CURRENT as of 2003/09/19.
The following patch can be applied:
http://www.fruitsalad.org/patches/kde314-fixpth.diff
using:
cd /usr/ports patch kde314-fixpth.diff
Please test this.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:13:48PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
First off, there is ONLY support for Promise and HPT soft RAID
in the ATA driver, other vendors products are *not* supported (yet).
Second, there seem to be a problem with some sil3112 setups where
timeouts and what not ruins the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:05:11PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
I'd have to reboot and see how recent my FreeBSD stuff is... I have been
rather distracted by the job which pays me salary :).
If you can do that, I'll check out a copy of the kernel from that
day and try to narrow down when the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 05:42:24PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
Ok... I built mine on Thu Sep 18 22:42:16 CDT 2003.
I think that's post ATAng commit.
WTF?!?! My problem is for Sep 18 kernel and later. I'll have to
try Sep 15 or something just to see...
Regards,
--
wca
Hi,
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2003-September/009918.html
src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c, rev 1.188
src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c, rev 1.8
After an exhaustive binary search, I've found this is the commit
that broke probing for my SATA disk. Merely reverting the change
on the latest
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:06:40PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
I have now found a way to reproduce the DMA problems some setups seems
to be having with the SiI3112A SATA chip.
Now, if I use real SATA drives, (and I mean real SATA drives, the
WD Raptor fx is not a real SATA device but just a
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA
design, but just the old stuff they used to make with the marvell
chip kludged on the back :)
The power
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:15:58PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
Yeah... I feel somewhat betrayed. Time to switch to a different drive
brand :)
I should have bought a Maxtor 10K III U160 SCSI drive instead. :)
Getting an appropriate controller would have been more expensive,
but the drive's
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain
the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person
following -current who doesn't build every day.
Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:10:41PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
Does this mean that the situation can ever arise where a security bug
is corrected in the advisory's announced releases but not in -current?
Or, can we assume that as of the time of the security announcement
the vulnerability has
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:45:10PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
These issues have been addressed in KDE 3.1.3 if you're patient enough
for Will to work out the kinks the ports will be updated in a week or
less.
Much more likely someone else on kde-freebsd is going to solve
those problems, if
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:49:50AM -0500, Nick H. - Network Operations wrote:
I attempted to use a D-Link DGE-500T card this weekend on 5.1-RELEASE
(and -CURRENT) with no success. It is unable to probe the device and find a
proper driver for it. My question is: are there any plans currently
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
I'm not entirely sure this belongs on -CURRENT, but I couldn't find any
KDE specific list similar to -gnome and I seem to recall that the building
of KDE3 was a desired goal for FreeBSD 5.0. That said, I apologize in
advance if this
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:02:07PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
It looks like Matt did this to fix vm.vmtotal. From sys/vm/vm_param.h:
Make 'sysctl vm.vmtotal' work properly using updated patch from Hiten.
(the patch in the PR was stale).
It looks to have been replaced by VM_TOTAL. I
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
Ok, I agree that the naming could cause confusion since there is a
vmmeter struct and a vmtotal struct. However, the Release Engineering
policy that was set out at the start of RELENG_5_0 is that public API
changes need
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 10:14:47PM -0600, Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer wrote:
Got this today after cvsup'ing earlier this morning:
Read src/UPDATING.
Regards,
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi,
Is anyone else here backing up -CURRENT machines using AMANDA?
I've been noticing that the backups for these machines have what
appear to be bad backups. That is to say, amverify gives things
like this:
[...]
firepipe-3 (ganymede._.20030304.1):
amrestore: 0: skipping start of tape: date
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:57:34AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
I've seen reports that dump compatability was broken. I'm dumping two
5.0 boxes and one 4-STABLE box to one of the 5.0 boxes and the amverify
I'm current running doesn't seem to have any problem. Thus, I'd tend to
suspect we need
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:39:01PM -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
I am writing a section for the Handbook on how to use gbde. Currently,
using gbde is a rather manual process. Each time a host reboots, the
admin needs to attach the gbde device(s), enter any required
passphrases, manually fsck the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:02:49PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
Forgot to mention, I had to make kcheckpass setuid root to make kcheckpass
itself work (just verified this on -stable).
Uh.. that's documented. See ports/x11/kdebase2/Makefile rev 1.77.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:15:58PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
Really? I just checked 1.77 and I don't see it. Can you tell me what to look
for?
Oops.. rev 1.78 in conjunction with pkg-message :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/kdebase2/Makefile.diff?r1=1.77r2=1.78
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:56:13AM +, Liu Siwei wrote:
This question is not appropriate for the -current list. I'm
expanding this to include the maintainers of the KDE ports to see
if anyone else has an idea what's going on.
I have a question about FreeBSD's locale. I use the zh_CN.EUC
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
load -CURRENT
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:57:47PM +0100, BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
Maybe...
I've changed my /etc/make.conf from the default, to be
MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
^^^
...you need to read the
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
load -CURRENT
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 03:57:59PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Bill, did you ever allowed them to make it GPL only ? Looking at the code
it should be possible to import some things and make a NIS+ client
available. But only if it's not GPL'd.
Interesting. I looked as nisgrep/nisgrep.c and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:59:16AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Machines with ACPI timecounters will now print 10 lines at boot when
the timer is tested.
You should mention that this requires bootverbose.
If you are lucky you will see ten times something like:
ACPI timer looks GOOD
encounter such problems in my KDE 2721 builds. I build on
4.1-RC with full OpenSSL sources.
BTW: I should have a webpage/ftpsite etc. ready for port test builds
tomorrow.. bug me if it's not announced soon. 8)
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:59:29AM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
Is there any reason why this is unacceptable and could not be committed?
Because it can be done with an awk/sed script?
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w
to your local directory /usr/local/etc/ and configure
them as they suit your local environment. (e.g. changing locations of
repositories)
Thank you *VERY*MUCH*.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w---
O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y
:00 -0400 UTC on
December 31, 1969).
But you *DO* have a real bug there.. ;-
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w---
O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G++ e h! r- y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail
upgrade ...
They were committed about 4 hours ago.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w---
O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+
G++ e h! r- y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
ental'' Postfix on his systems.
And there are *LOTS* of people who think that whatever Wietse runs is
good enough for them.. so this statement had better be hased on personal
experience about the actual stability of ``experimental''.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Physics Computer Network wen
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 03:41:07PM -0500, Mark Hittinger wrote:
For the past couple of days the old style binaries don't work under -current,
they simply core.
Well, my attitude would be "so what?". But others may find a valid need
for a.out binaries *shrug*.
--
Will Andr
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:40:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
netscape.
Nope. BSDI Netscape bins don't require a.out libs.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Physics Computer Network wench
The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics."
-- Com
going to bug Warner/Soren at BSDCon ...
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Physics Computer Network wench
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
leave INET6 support in the GENERIC
kernel. I'm sure there are better things to disable, like MFS, SYSV*,
P1003_P1B and friends, and ICMP_BANDLIM.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Physics Computer Network wench
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:27:50PM +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
MFS is required; don't forget we have mfsroot.flp :-)
Oh yeah... time to drink some more caffeinated pop and wake up..
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Physics Computer Network wench
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:46:43PM +0300, Dmitry Valdov wrote:
licq doesn't work since crt* change.. (coredumps) Any workaround?
(recompile if licq qt doesn't help).
/usr/ports/net/licq
IIRC, the discussion about that found that it wasn't crt*'s fault but
rather a bug in the dynamic linker.
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:21:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.
That's why PREFIX exists.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:14:32AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
You are simply wrong in your characterization of /usr/local. As far
back as I can remember, /usr/local has been used for locally installed
[...]
Pfft. Everyone has their own way of organizing files. There is no
right or wrong.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:14:38PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Log:
Fix a bug introduced in rev. 1.17: initialize variables before use, not after.
Rev. 1.17 was "Obtained from NetBSD", but is significantly different from the
equivalent NetBSD revision (rev. 1.30), which does
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 03:32:48AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
This was caused by a heisenbug in make(1) which I fixed a few minutes
ago.
Yes, this is my fault. Sorry to everyone who has/had problems.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:42:18PM +0100, German Tischler wrote:
cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D_
_DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/
src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -DHESIOD
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
