Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 01/04/2012 20:52, Matthew Tippett wrote: > > As a service to the community or vendor that publishes the tuning > guide, Michael is more than willing to redo a tuned vs untuned > comparison. To date, the communities have never taken us up on that > offer. In part, this affects Phoronix.com

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 12/24/2011 12:04, O. Hartmann wrote: There maybe serious reasons having the Linuxulator, i do not know. But if not, why spending rare developer resources on that? As far as I'm concerned, the only real reason having the Linuxulator is some stuff from Adobe for desktop systems, Flash. That's it

Re: Failure to compile world

Ok, just sent the PR → http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163495 And hopefully I'll make another one describing some other issues I'm having (like world compilation taking libs/headers from system instead of the own src tree, failing to compile due to missing symbols in libraries or cha

Re: Failure to compile world

On 12/20/2011 01:52, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Alex Kuster wrote: A follow-up on this is libc not building because of missing SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT apparently the Makefile doesn't include /sys/ into the includes of the libc. My current version (/usr/in

Re: Failure to compile world

A follow-up on this is libc not building because of missing SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT apparently the Makefile doesn't include /sys/ into the includes of the libc. My current version (/usr/include/netinet/sctp.h) lacks that definition, it should look in the headers of the source, not the curre

Re: Failure to compile world

http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#__builtin_unreachable http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1453.htm Apparently this is the problem: _Noreturn void abort(void); // [...] more declarations _Noreturn void exit(int); Those noreturns are supposed to be writte

Failure to compile world

Hi people! I'm writing here because I'm having issues with compiling world from a Symphony# uname -a FreeBSD Symphony 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #2: Fri Dec 16 18:52:44 ART 2011 vertex@Symphony:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Machine with latest source from that date. I'm using t

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 12/16/2011 02:41, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is using

Re: CLANG; still cc in use when building the WORLD with CLANG?

Thanks for pointing out those details ! This whole thing about make.conf & src.conf is very confusing and gives the impression of something half ported ... Because I honestly though that src.conf was for freebsd sources as indicated by the manpage (and in fact, compiled sources that way without is

Re: CLANG; still cc in use when building the WORLD with CLANG?

Hi, read this -> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011- August/thread.html#26468 Using the /etc/make.conf with CURDIR approach seems to be broken from some time now ... I would also recommend you to move the clang stuff for base system where it belongs ( /etc/src.conf .. see sr

Re: libc build broken with clang ?

> > For now, remove the line: > > CFLAGS+="-march=native" > > from your make.conf, and try again. Clang still has some problems with > this setting, and you are most likely hitting them. Whoops, didn't know that ... I actually used "-march=native" before, but never had any kind of problems (I

libc build broken with clang ?

Hi! I'm writing because I'm having some issues with -CURRENT and clang in amd64. I first compiled latest revision at this date and everything went ok: > [0][root@Symphony ~]# uname -a > FreeBSD Symphony.Gl 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Sun Jul 10 10:38:28 > ART 2011 t...@symphony.gl:/u