Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-30 Thread Damian Gerow
(Re-sending, my original post was accepted by mx1.freebsd.org, but seems to have been lost somewhere.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 17:04]: > But this is a little OT. I'll find some way to update my system, and > respond back if the problem's fixed o

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 17:18]: > Can't you boot from the install floppy and then do a network install? Don't have any floppies handy right now. I /could/ go out and get some... But this is a little OT. I'll find some way to update my system, and respond back if th

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 16:23]: > > over and over and over -- it makes the console essentially unusable. > > I think you're running into problems that have been fixed in > subsequent weeks. Is there a reason you can't install the 5.2-BETA > image? Well, that's good

Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
A couple days ago, I downloaded 20031116-JPSNAP to install on a new system -- this box had been running 5.1-R without issues for some time, but wasn't doing anything particular, and I had mucked up the 5.1 -> 5.2 upgrade (statfs stuff). Whenever I boot the system into multi-user mode, I see a *lot

Re: tcp hostcache and ip fastforward for review

2003-11-12 Thread Damian Gerow
I've been thinking about this all day... Thus spake Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23:53:26 11/12/03: : > + /* : > +* Only unicast IP, not from loopback, no L2 or IP broadcast, : > +* no multicast, no INADDR_ANY : > +*/ : > + if ((m->m_pkthdr.rcvif->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) ||

Re: No/weird mixer in -CURRENT

2003-09-27 Thread Damian Gerow
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:24:10 -0700, thus spake "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : > Does anyone have any suggestions or pointers? As much as I like : > listening to something at full volume, it would be nice to be able : > to turn it down without turning it off. : : Are you seeing this with a

Re: No/weird mixer in -CURRENT

2003-09-26 Thread Damian Gerow
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:19:12 -0400, thus spake Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : This is a fairly new machine, using a DFI PS83-BL motherboard. pcm0 : is picked up as an Intel ICH5 (82801EB), and a C-Media Electronics : CMI9739 AC97 Codec. : : Does pcm not fully understand my audio devi

No/weird mixer in -CURRENT

2003-09-21 Thread Damian Gerow
I just set up a new box with -CURRENT on it, using 20030918-JPSNAP (cvsup'ed the next day), and I'm having some really strange things going on with volume control. aumix won't complain, and will successfully query the mixer device. I can set the volume levels to my hearts content, but the only

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 16:24]: > I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help > someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers > that are stored in RSD PTR. I'm still on 5.1-R, and there's no '-t' flag to acpidump.

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 15:00]: > I'm almost certain your problem is defining MAXMEM to 512 MB. Remove that > from your kernel config and try again. MAXMEM causes all kinds of > problems. If this doesn't solve it, start with the stock GENERIC and add > back in your c

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
(To recap: I'm having ACPI problems on a DFI CD70-SC, with both 5.1-R and 5-CURRENT. Booting GENERIC doesn't show any problems, however, so there's a good chance it's a misconfiguration issue.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/09/03 17:34]: > It's

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/09/03 14:42]: > The post you reference shows the user with a kernel that has both APM and > ACPI installed, apparently. This is not valid. > > Please report your kernel config. If GENERIC in 2003/9/6 booted fine with > ACPI and then your rebuilt ker

ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-07 Thread Damian Gerow
I set up a box yesterday to play with -CURRENT on. I used the 2003-09-06 snapshot code from ftp://current.freebsd.org/. Initial setup and boot worked just fine, but when I did a rebuild/reboot last night, this is what I saw: pmap_mapdev: Couldn't alloc kernel virtual memory So thinking I mi

Re: NVidia driver stability?

2003-07-11 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Evan Dower ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [10/07/03 19:41]: > The new nvidia-driver was unstable for me as well. So much so that I > deinstalled it so I could get some actual work done. I never was able o get > any specifics about it, as I don't have a serial console set up, and when > it crashe

Re: VIA C3

2003-06-18 Thread Damian Gerow
This isn't really a -current issue, moving to hardware. Please strip the Cc: in your reply. Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/06/03 11:20]: > > FWIW, the best way I've seen to figure out which chip you're using (at least > > between Ezra/Ezra-T and Nehemiah) is to look at the clockin

Re: VIA C3

2003-06-18 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/06/03 11:00]: > > If you have a 'Samuel2' core, then you have a Samuel2 core. It's neither > > Ezra nor Ezra-T -- those two are the successors to Samuel2. > > Well, all I can say is, that I bought it as "Ezra" and there is "Ezra" > printed on it. Fre

Re: VIA C3

2003-06-18 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/06/03 10:40]: > > CPU: VIA/IDT Unknown (998.70-MHz 686-class CPU) > > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x689 Stepping = 9 > > Features=0x803035 > > This one doesn't seem to support SSE, though I wonder why there is > this "unknown". My C3 here is an

ATA mount failur (Was: Re: Panics with GnuPG)

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Doug Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03.03.13 13:27]: > Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of > sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to > yours, and hsu fixed it. I'd like to verify, but using updated sources as of about four hours ago, I

Panics with GnuPG

2003-03-12 Thread Damian Gerow
I've been running -CURRENT on my workstation for a couple of months, and have been quite impressed. But I've started seeing pretty consistant panics when verifying PGP-signed messages. Everything was fine until I cvsup'ed about two weeks ago, and is still apparent in another cvsup as of March 10.