On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never
Hello, what do you make of this PR report ?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/152605
This panic happens during bg-fsck every time. I have to boot into
single user-mode and do a fsck to correct.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
What are the chances the detection fails and one still needs to disable ACPI
and can't because it's not showing as a option ?
Thanks,
David Rhodus
On Nov 8, 2010, at 5:14 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
This patch changes the Forth code for the Beastie menu to only display the
menu
Same panic here...
Also the MPD2 port is broken, I'm guessing a netgraph problem too.
2010/11/5 sdfsdf rwerwer freebsd-tracker-int...@mail.ru:
Hi everybody,
The following commands lead the 9.0-CURRENT kernel to crash:
[r...@freebsd /usr/home/int0dh]# ngctl
Available commands:
config
I haven't seen much of this since 5.x days. Anyone else see calcru
messages lately ?
-DR
NFS# uname -a
FreeBSD NFS.Lesmilde.com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #2: Fri Oct
29 01:07:40 CDT 2010
r...@nfs.lesmilde.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
NFS# tail -25 /var/log/messages
Oct 30
Thanks, make delete-old
fixed everything.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote:
Hello.
I've just had this error yesterday. It seems, that utmp.h file is still in
the system. Make in /usr/src:
make delete-old
and try again .
David Rhodus wrote
Is there a rc.conf variable to automatically save core on a panic and reboot ?
Setting dumpdev=AUTO doesn't seem to do the trick.
# uname -a
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jun 3 20:00:22 UTC
2010 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GE amd64
#
Doing a ./test.sh make crashes my -current machine pretty quickly.
It stops inBuilding in /usr/src/tools/regression/bin/mv
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Erik Cederstrand e...@cederstrand.dk wrote:
Den 03/06/2010 kl. 21.54 skrev Giorgos Keramidas:
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:50:13 +0200,
Anyone have a SUJ patch set for 8.x ?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
===Verifying install for sessreg in /usr/ports/x11/sessreg
=== Building for sessreg-1.0.5
make all-am
cc -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs
-fno-strict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wformat=2
Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
same pattern.
-- Terry
Terry, what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
dynamically
linked in darwin ? Has anyone done timed runs
Ryan Sommers wrote:
I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was
about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every
other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing.
Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of virus
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 06:11 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
David Rhodus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
real. Ops, now thats right, we don't have 3.6.1 in STABLE, why ? It
was released on April 1, does that not give one enough
On Sunday, September 14, 2003, at 07:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sep 14 17:46:52 local7.notice target logger: TCP_Wrappers ALLOW:
source/target,rshd,974,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 14 17:46:52 auth.info target inetd[974]: connection from source,
service rshd (tcp)
Sep 14 17:46:52 auth.info
On Saturday, September 6, 2003, at 05:33 PM, Petri Helenius wrote:
While fscking from previous panic in ufs2 code on -CURRENT from Sep 2,
I got this:
panic: ffs_copyonwrite: recursive call
Reboot into single usermode and run the fsck. Then update your kernel
as Jeff had broken a fews things
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 12:48 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
Oh, that *is* interesting. I get this 100% of the time when trying to
run the i386 binary on my amd64 boxes. Hmm. Maybe I dont have an
emulation
bug then?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:46am]~-99 ./cvsup -gL2 cvs-supfile
Parsing supfile
When I start the rsync daemon under 5-RELEASE, I can only connect to it
on the localhost. Trying to connect to it from any remote host fails.
Trying to telnet to the 873 port fails as well. Everything is on a
local lan connection without any type of fire-walling going on, also
using the
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 05:31 PM, Sean Winn wrote:
What does netstat -na | grep 873 show?
On one machine that rsync start's on, I get this from netstat.
tcp6 0 0 *.873 *.*
LISTEN
On another machine that it just dies and never seems
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 09:01 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
with last hour, cvsup current, rebuild everything,... immediately
after kernel mount msg for /
kernel cranks out msg
Be nice to each other, mmmkay?
system otherwise fine. Is this a known prank?
It is now. It's in
: No such file or directory.
ftp mkdir test
257 test directory created.
ftp rmdir ~will/test
250 RMD command successful.
ftp
--
David Rhodus
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
...
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -g
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 06:00 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-04 ]
[ Subjecte: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r
mutex ]
Juli Mallett pointed me at the following
I have also been having a few problems with vinum on 5.0-RC1.
I've been having a hard time making a striped or raid5 vinum with more
than 4 disk's. On the 5th+ disk's vinum will see and says device is
not configured.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 01:39 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Kirk McKusick wrote:
Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole
system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what
happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or
does it
25 matches
Mail list logo
