Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

2001-08-26 Thread Kaila

On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:50:33AM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
 
  For 5.0, I maybe the black sheep in saying this, but I'd like to see
  /bin/csh be the real thing for 5.0.  By all means, leave tcsh in
  /bin, but for the sake of backwards compatability, IMHO `ln
  /bin/tcsh /bin/csh` was a bad idea.
 
 Frankly, this isn't going to happen.  We went through all this months
 ago: please just accept the will of the community and drop the matter.
 
 Kris
 

Frankly, this exact statement is the sort of reason I didn't try to weigh in
on this issue myself when it happened, or any of a dozen other issues.  Adding
tcsh is fine, renaming it to csh breaks things.  That's like renaming less to
more... oh wait, we already did that.

The argument isn't to not add new software, it's not even to not drop old
software.  Add tcsh is fine.  Get rid of csh is fine.  Just don't call tcsh
csh, without making sure the csh call is 100% compatible with the last version
of csh shipped.  If tcsh were csh, then it would be named csh.  Guess what?
It's named tcsh because it is NOT csh. It's better to have _nothing_ in
/bin/csh and be done with it.

If that had been done, I'd have been saved several hours of work and research
personally to find out why scores of scripts broke, including some things as
simple as login prompts that had embedded escape sequences.

I won't say anything more on this issue, and probably on no others as I am
fairly sure that it won't be listened to.  I will just say that I have been
using FreeBSD since 2.0-snap, and have been a consistent advocate of it.  I
have spent many thousands of dollars having merchandise made (pens, cards,
etc), which I gave away free in an effort to bring in users.  I have converted
my entire company to FreeBSD, and I am now seriously looking at alternatives
to FreeBSD.  Perhaps net or open, perhaps linux, perhaps forking my own
distribution.

The motto used to be do it right, not do it the way WE want it on OUR
machines, and screw the people who don't make the decisions or cause to much
trouble to ignore.

If you want to know why the user community is so quiet, you need to ask
yourself.  If you were spoken to this way, if your preferences and needs were
consistently ignored on the basis this is a volunteer project, neener!, how
likely would you be to bother commenting?

I realize I'll probably get flamed for this, but at this point, I no longer
care.  I won't be paying to have any more pens or cards made, I won't be
making any more deals with companies to get free resources for this
community, and I may begin transitioning my network soon.  I can't keep
spending more time fixing this kind of silly cruft than I did installing the
os.


[ Name  : Christine F. Maxwell] [ ICQ : #45010616  ]
[ EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ IRC : Kaila  ]
[ Home  : http://www.cfm.o-o.org/ ] [ BBS : http://www.aci.o-o.org ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

2001-08-26 Thread Kaila

On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Mike Smith wrote:

  The motto used to be do it right, not do it the way WE want it on OUR
  machines, and screw the people who don't make the decisions or cause to much
  trouble to ignore.
 
 It still is.  And recognising that csh has evolved over the last decade 
 is part of doing it right.
 

No, doing it right would have been including tcsh and deprecating csh, then
dropping it later as has been done with other things.

Naming linking it to csh broke things for people who weren't informed it was
happeneing, and then had to go and spend hours tracking down the problem and
fixing it.

 What you're really saying is you didn't do what *I* think is right, and 
 I'm packing up my toys and going home.
 

No, what I am saying is I am a long time user who is getting fed up with THIS
type of comment and attitude, and that I might as well go find an alternative
that Does it right instead of continuing to put up with having this sort of
commentary lobbed at people who dare to voice their opinions.

 That's your perogative, but it's hardly the mature stance to be taking.
 

Read over your response.  What did it have to do with my issues?  Nothing.  It
was a defensive reaction, resorting to name calling because you had nothing
logical to refute with.  Do you call THIS mature?


[ Name  : Christine F. Maxwell] [ ICQ : #45010616  ]
[ EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ IRC : Kaila  ]
[ Home  : http://www.cfm.o-o.org/ ] [ BBS : http://www.aci.o-o.org ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message