Re: param.h

2003-03-14 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Well, I was able to build it on -CURRENT, along with binutils and other fine software from -STABLE tree. The reason was that in several cases GCC 3.2.1 proved to be significantly slower than 2.95.4 (I mean regular integer\floating-point operations, MMX\SSE\3DNow! is a whole different story). I repl

Re: can't boot with twe anymore.

2003-03-14 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
FreeBSD is a free software. You have no right to make any claims or force developers to do something to fit your needs (did you read BSD license?). If it's used to work fine but currently broken, it will be fixed. Also you're always welcome to fix it yourself. By installing -CURRENT, you agree that

param.h

2003-03-14 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Hello gentlemen, the question is, why param.h (v1.65) that comes with 5.0 doesn't define OBJFORMAT_NAMES and OBJFORMAT_DEFAULT, but v1.54 does? These are required by GCC 2.95.4 at compile-time (pulled from -STABLE). It may look like someone had decided that GCC2 is of no use in -CURRENT... --- Re

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-27 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Bruce Cran wrote: > I'm afraid you're wrong - the V2SI datatype and MMX functions > automatically become available after -march=pentium2, while > with other processor types you've got to explicitly add -mmmx. > -msse is presumed with -march=pentium3 and up. I'm afraid I'm not; I was talking strictl

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a little question: > > Does -march=k6-2 implies -m3dnow? Or -march=pentiumpro implies -mmmx? Pentium Pro doesn't support MMX; -march=pentiumpro (aka -march=i686) enables compiling with main i686 instruction set, no MMX\SSE or whatever. > > I always thought

RE: cc: Internal error: Illegal instruction (program as)

2003-02-25 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
"Paul A. Howes" wrote: > > All; > > These two kernel options seem to have solved the problem. Builds now > run smoothly and error-free. I read the comments in NOTES about these > options and something clicked: I recall that most Pentium processors > will only deal with 4 kB pages. Aren't 4 MB

Re: Netscape 4.76 & MGA DRI

2003-02-10 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Scott Long wrote: > > Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote: > > > Hello gentlemen, > > > > several days ago I've installed 5.0-RELEASE onto one > > of my machines, which already carried 4.7-RC1. To > > avoid possible compatibility problems, I did a clean &g

Netscape 4.76 & MGA DRI

2003-02-10 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Hello gentlemen, several days ago I've installed 5.0-RELEASE onto one of my machines, which already carried 4.7-RC1. To avoid possible compatibility problems, I did a clean install onto another hard drive, and later recompiled everything. Here I have a couple of annoying issues. Shell refuses to