Re: Breaking build world costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-16 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:21:54PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-)

Re: Breaking build world costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 11:06:50AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and : contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it : all come due at the next

Re: Breaking build world costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) I think

Re: proposed pkg_delete change

2000-05-08 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 02:30:59AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: (such as kde, after testing the port) I want to delete that package, and all it's dependancies; instead of going around looking for the [...] That would be cool, yes. If you've got the time to do it, I think it would be

Re: Small MAKEDEV bug

2000-05-08 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:56:03PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote: I don't buy it :-). This syntax is similar to a special case of the syntax of jot(1). It's better to use jot(1) directly, e.g.: MAKEDEV $(jot -w da 2 0)# make 2 acd devices beginning at acd0 b$ which

Re: /usr/ports/ too big?

2000-02-11 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:45:44AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: All I would propose is that those subdirectories do not need to be part of the base distribution -- that typing 'make modulename' in the parent directory (e.g. typing 'make ssh' in ports/security) would first

Re: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly

2000-01-23 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 06:56:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: Each host gets a value of 1 (unless you go in and tweak it). Hosts are tried in order of their values and in some unspecified order in [...] Each time you successfully connect, you get a bonus of B. I think you need to keep an

Re: Here's what I'm using

2000-01-22 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:56:38PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: arbitrary and works for me. I'm sure this could be improved, especially to make the order random. It really isn't too hard... I wouldn't be surprised if this crosses another solution in email. :) #! /bin/sh if [ -z "$1" ];

Re: Here's what I'm using

2000-01-22 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 11:05:18AM -0500, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:56:38PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: arbitrary and works for me. I'm sure this could be improved, especially to make the order random. It really isn't too hard... I wouldn't be surprised

Re: more

1999-09-12 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: On this CURRENT of 3-4 weeks old I can do /blah and then use / to find the next occurance of blah in the same file. With the `new' more this behaviour has been barfed. Accidentally. I didn't notice that particular

Re: can't install on machine with 8 Meg

1999-06-12 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 01:08:00PM -0400, Brian Dean wrote: Hi, I'm installing 4.0-19990610-SNAP onto a machine with 8 Meg of memory and it fails as follows: pid 6 (sh), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space There's a rumour going around that you need 12 meg to install. Why, I don't

Re: About the panic

1999-06-07 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 01:45:47AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: Don't wory. I guess with my dual controllers, that's likely what did it. I only had ahc0, not ahc1, in my config file. For some reason, it didn't like that anymore. Hmm... I guess GENERIC wouldn't have booted for you either.

Re: About the panic

1999-06-07 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 12:01:15PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: Don't wory. I guess with my dual controllers, that's likely what did it. I only had ahc0, not ahc1, in my config file. For some reason, it didn't like that anymore. Hmm... I guess GENERIC wouldn't have booted for you

Re: -stable vs -current (was Re: solid NFS patch #6... )

1999-04-30 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: I expect the 3.2 release to be a really good release. I seem to recall that 2.2.x wasn't even called -stable until 2.2.2. That .2 release is exactly where 3.x is right now... -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or