RFC 3514

2003-04-02 Thread qhwt
Hello, I'd be glad if you revert the change in rev 1.23 of sys/netinet/ip.h unless there's some special reason you can't undo your rfc3514 implementation. Thanks. (Yes, I regret not having been subscribed to cvs-all list...:) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Linux emulation busted

2003-03-25 Thread qhwt
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:58:35AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: I had a working Linux world on my laptop. I upgraded my kernel and acroread4 stopped working. Now all I get is: Exited with error code: 0x400e0009.

Re: Linux emulation busted

2003-03-24 Thread qhwt
Hi, On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: I had a working Linux world on my laptop. I upgraded my kernel and acroread4 stopped working. Now all I get is: Exited with error code: 0x400e0009. after a whole lot of disk access when I try to run it. This worked on

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.c if_ef.c if_ethersubr.c if_faith.c if_fddisubr.c if_gif.c if_iso88025subr.c if_loop.c if_ppp.c if_sl.c if_spppsubr.c if_stf.c if_tun.c netisr.c netisr.h src/sys/netatalk aarp.c at_extern.h at_var.h ...

2003-03-08 Thread qhwt
Hello. On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:19:55PM -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote: jlemon 2003/03/04 15:19:55 PST FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/net if_arcsubr.c if_atmsubr.c if_ef.c if_ethersubr.c if_faith.c if_fddisubr.c

Re: Request for info from SiS chipset owners

2003-02-01 Thread qhwt
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Soeren Schmidt wrote: Just reply to this message with the output from pciconf -l and you have helped me sort out the myriads of SiS chipsets out there. agp0@pci0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x06481039 chip=0x06481039 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 pcib1@pci0:1:0:

Re: Is this a tool problem or source?

2002-10-14 Thread qhwt
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:26:55PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: ref3# make linking kernel.debug ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3. ref3# having done a new cvsup and a new

panic trying to chroot(2) on a script(?)

2002-10-03 Thread qhwt
other than the backtrace(attached), let me know it. Regards. Script started on Thu Oct 3 23:27:19 2002 qhwt@gzl$ gdb -k /usr/obj/kernel/kernel.debug vmcore.14 GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread qhwt
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem with building CURRENT on

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread qhwt
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:22:23PM +0900, I wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this

Re: can't compile kernel?

2002-09-19 Thread qhwt
Hi. On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:15:40PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: New datapoint: If I compile the kernel in the old fashion (config SB; cd ../compile/SB; make depend all install) then the kernel compiles and installs fine. However I get the error below when doing a 'make kernel' from

Re: can't compile kernel?

2002-09-19 Thread qhwt
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:15:48PM +0900, I wrote: On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:15:40PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: New datapoint: If I compile the kernel in the old fashion (config SB; cd ../compile/SB; make depend all install) then the kernel compiles and installs fine. However I get

panic: free: address 0xc1802270(0xc1802000) has not been allocated.

2002-08-03 Thread qhwt
Hello. I've encountered this panic with kernel from source as of 2002.07.30.00.00.00 . I've seen this panic message in Julian's message in July [EMAIL PROTECTED], but he said in another mail that it was a pilot error. I've searched the list archive and PR, but found none similar to this. The

integer devide fault in dummynet_io

2002-07-16 Thread qhwt
= 0x0, lookup_depth = 0, lookup_step = 0, lookup_weight = 0, avg_pkt_size = 0, max_pkt_size = 0} (kgdb) qhwt@gzl$ exit

Re: panic at boot in ffs_valloc

2002-07-15 Thread qhwt
Hi. On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:36:24PM +0200, Rasmus Skaarup wrote: I'm also suddenly having a panics - every 5 minutes actually, since my latest cvsup a few hours ago. They seem to be related to some ufs and ffs calls.. I'm not able to read my core dumps for some reason (gdb says kernel

Re: LOOKUP_SHARED is default now

2002-05-06 Thread qhwt
Hi. On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:08:04AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: This patch has seriously reduced file system deadlocks for several people. It also makes concurrent file system access much faster in certain cases. Since I have only heard good reports and no bad reports I'm going to enable

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp Makefile async.c async.h atm.cbundle.c ccp.c ccp.h chap.c chap.h chat.c command.c datalink.cdatalink.h defs.c defs.h ether.c exec.c i4b.c lcp.c lcp.h main.cmppe.c netgraph.c netgraph.h physical.c physical.h route.c tcp.c ...

2002-04-14 Thread qhwt
Hello. brian 2002/03/30 04:30:11 PST Modified files: usr.sbin/ppp Makefile async.c async.h atm.c bundle.c ccp.c ccp.h chap.c chap.h chat.c command.c datalink.c datalink.h defs.c defs.h

Dhclient with non-writable /etc/resolv.conf

2002-03-22 Thread qhwt
After having updated to the world past 2002-02-19, dhclient started very fast cycle of acquiring and releasing leases every time it was attached to the local network, like it's attacking the DHCP server. After all, it was /sbin/dhclient-script that failed trying to update /etc/resolv.conf which

Re: Won't boot after the commits to timecounter code

2002-03-14 Thread qhwt
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:40:07AM +0900, I wrote: Apparently you have KTR enabled (not the default in GENERIC). I think WITNESS+KTR already caused nasty recursion from the mtx_lock_spin, and we now get an endless loop when nanotime() is called with an invalid timecounter in the

Re: Won't boot after the commits to timecounter code

2002-03-06 Thread qhwt
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 08:49:18AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message 20020306054514.GA395@gzl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello. After upgrading to the kernel as of 2002-03-03 00:00:00(UTC), it stopped booting just after the message: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz

Re: Won't boot after the commits to timecounter code

2002-03-06 Thread qhwt
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 04:34:00AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I inserted a pair of printf() inside mtx_lock_spin/mtx_unlock_spin in i8254_get_timecount() and it kept printing the message while tc_init() was blocked, so I think it's blocked at

Won't boot after the commits to timecounter code

2002-03-05 Thread qhwt
Hello. After upgrading to the kernel as of 2002-03-03 00:00:00(UTC), it stopped booting just after the message: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz With some debugging printf()'s inserted, I found it was tc-tc_get_timecount() called from tco_delta() called just after the bcopy() in