At 05:25 AM 3/4/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Buildworld of FBSD 10.o-CUR/amd64 fails with the below shown error
messages since this weekend:
clang -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3
-fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-I/usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint/../lint1 -DPREFIX=\\
On Sunday 04 March 2012 16:27:56 Manfred Antar wrote:
At 05:25 AM 3/4/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Buildworld of FBSD 10.o-CUR/amd64 fails with the below shown error
messages since this weekend:
clang -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3
-fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
On 03/04/12 18:51, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2012 16:27:56 Manfred Antar wrote:
At 05:25 AM 3/4/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Buildworld of FBSD 10.o-CUR/amd64 fails with the below shown error
messages since this weekend:
clang -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -pipe -O3
On 2012-03-04 21:34, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Where are those new WITH_CLANG_ tags documented?
In src.conf(5), where all the WITH_ and WITHOUT_ settings are
documented.
I should probably have sent a heads up to this list, to announce this
new setting, which installs clang as /usr/bin/cc,
On 03/04/12 22:46, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-04 21:34, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Where are those new WITH_CLANG_ tags documented?
In src.conf(5), where all the WITH_ and WITHOUT_ settings are
documented.
I should probably have sent a heads up to this list, to announce this
new
On 2012-03-05 00:40, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
All right, my /etc/src.conf looks like this now (as it does before):
WITH_CLANG= YES
WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= YES
#
WITH_BIND_LIBS= YES
WITH_BIND_SIGCHASE= YES
WITH_BIND_LARGE_FILE= YES
#
WITH_IDEA= YES
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:29:38AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:54:36 +0100
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk said:
mexas On r225932 with
mexas SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
mexas SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
mexas
On r225932 with
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
SENDMAIL_LDADD+=-lsasl2
in /etc/make.conf and with cyrus-sasl-2.1.25_1 installed,
I get these errors on make buildworld:
cc -O2 -pipe
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:54:36 +0100
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk said:
mexas On r225932 with
mexas SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
mexas SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
mexas SENDMAIL_LDADD+=-lsasl2
mexas in /etc/make.conf and with
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Beach Geek labeachg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/27/11, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried moving aside your existing /usr/src and checking it out
afresh?
On Aug 28, 2011 12:47 AM, Beach Geek labeachg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/25/11, Dimitry
On 17 October 2011 00:19, Beach Geek labeachg...@gmail.com wrote:
PS. A side note, we got a native driver working for the RTL8188CE wireless
card, but it's still really buggy, but it's a start.
Yay! I have one of those around here somewhere too..
Adrian
On 8/27/11, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried moving aside your existing /usr/src and checking it out
afresh?
On Aug 28, 2011 12:47 AM, Beach Geek labeachg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/25/11, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-08-25 17:12, Beach Geek wrote:
make
On 8/25/11, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2011-08-25 17:12, Beach Geek wrote:
make buildworld failed trying to upgrade from r223619 to r225128.
(Note: Updating other boxes from r224774 to r225119 went flawless)
On failing laptop (Toshibs Sat C655D)
make buildworld failed trying to upgrade from r223619 to r225128.
(Note: Updating other boxes from r224774 to r225119 went flawless)
On failing laptop (Toshibs Sat C655D)
uname -v
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r223619 Tue Jun 28 CDT 2011 ...
svn info /usr/src
URL: svn.freebsd.org/base/head
...
On 2011-08-25 17:12, Beach Geek wrote:
make buildworld failed trying to upgrade from r223619 to r225128.
(Note: Updating other boxes from r224774 to r225119 went flawless)
On failing laptop (Toshibs Sat C655D)
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stringfwd.h:56: internal compiler error:
On Mon Aug 15 11, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
Could you try the attached patch and see if it helps? I currently have it
in the re@ approval queue. It does appear to fix the problem here.
thanks. the patch
Hello, all!
I have:
uname -a
FreeBSD nonamehost 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0 r224806M: Sat Aug 13
15:43:38 EEST 2011 ivan@nonamehost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mk9 amd64
Buildworld failure after update r224806 to r224886
In my configuration files since nothing has changed...
Building
On 2011-08-15 19:38, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Hello, all!
I have:
uname -a
FreeBSD nonamehost 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0 r224806M: Sat Aug 13
15:43:38 EEST 2011 ivan@nonamehost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mk9 amd64
Buildworld failure after update r224806 to r224886
In my configuration
В Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:12:35 +0200
Niclas Zeising niclas.zeis...@gmail.com пишет:
...
Someone have any idea what is that?
Thanks!
There was a period when there was a bug in dev/std{in,err,out}, which
amongst other things made it impossible to complete a buildworld.
Compile a
On 08/13/11 18:30, Test Rat wrote:
Test Ratttse...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Remaking `cat'
Results of making cat:
clang -O2 -pipe -O3 -Qunused-arguments -fcolor-diagnostics
-march=native -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector
-Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
hi there,
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
=== sys/modules/portalfs (depend)
@ - /usr/git-freebsd-head/sys
machine - /usr/git-freebsd-head/sys/amd64/include
x86 - /usr/git-freebsd-head/sys/x86/include
awk -f @/tools/vnode_if.awk @/kern/vnode_if.src -p
awk -f @/tools/vnode_if.awk @/kern
The module makefile needs to be updated evidently. Just add it to the
dependencies until rwatson gets around to fixing it.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
=== sys/modules/portalfs (depend
that aren't built for INVARIANTS but a GENERIC kernel that is built for
INVARIANTS...) It sounds like a recipe for unfortunate things.
Robert
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
=== sys/modules/portalfs
Dear all:
As you may have seen from current@ traffic, a bug crept in during the Capsicum
merge, introduced by the infamous Last Minute Cleanup and not caught in
pre-commit testing. The most noticed effect of the bug is to cause buildworld
to fail due to a problem with
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
Could you try the attached patch and see if it helps? I currently have it in
the re@ approval queue. It does appear to fix the problem here.
Generally, I would strongly advise against using modules
I run several boxes based on FreebSD 9.0-BETA1/amd64, compiled with
clang. Since yesterday, I run on all of these
machines into strange situations: buildworld won't build anymore, it
fails always on all boxes at
the very same position as showed by the error message below. I can build
and
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:39, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I run several boxes based on FreebSD 9.0-BETA1/amd64, compiled with clang.
Since yesterday, I run on all of these
machines into strange situations: buildworld won't build anymore, it fails
always on all boxes at
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
I run several boxes based on FreebSD 9.0-BETA1/amd64, compiled with
clang. Since yesterday, I run on all of these
machines into strange situations: buildworld won't build anymore, it
fails always on all boxes at
the very same position as
Test Rat ttse...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Remaking `cat'
Results of making cat:
clang -O2 -pipe -O3 -Qunused-arguments -fcolor-diagnostics
-march=native -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector
-Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__isnanf in both libc and libm. GCC,
On 6/28/11 1:42 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=core2
.if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == cc
CC=clang
CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments
.endif
.if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == c++
CXX=clang++
.endif
NO_WERROR=
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Eric McCorkle e...@shadowsun.net wrote:
On 6/27/11 8:29 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-06-27 04:32, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Pan Tsu iny...@gmail.com wrote:
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Just noticed, the CFLAGS would disable optimization, which would explain why
no one else seems to see this. Still, I think the underlying issue warrants
investigation.
Two
On 2011-06-27 04:32, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__isnanf in both libc and libm. GCC, on the
On 6/27/11 8:29 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-06-27 04:32, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=core2
.if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == cc
CC=clang
CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments
.endif
.if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == c++
CXX=clang++
.endif
NO_WERROR=
WERROR=
NO_FSCHG=
PERL_VERSION=5.12.3
Just noticed, the CFLAGS would disable
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=core2
.if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == cc
CC=clang
CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments
.endif
.if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == c++
CXX=clang++
.endif
NO_WERROR=
WERROR=
NO_FSCHG=
PERL_VERSION=5.12.3
Just
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__isnanf in both libc and libm. GCC, on the other hand, builds just fine.
The file
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:32:02PM -0400, Eric McCorkle wrote:
A better solution, I think, is to modify math.h with something like this:
#ifdef __clang__
#define isnan(n) __builtin_isnan(n)
...
#endif
Please, no. Don't touch math.h.
--
Steve
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:29:39 -0500, Derek Tattersall d...@mebtel.net wrote:
I blew away /usr/src and /usr/obj and re-cvsuped this morning. I
attempted to buildworld, only to have the process die in the mkdep step.
CC='clang' mkdep -f .depend -a
* Giorgos Keramidas keram...@freebsd.org [101223 06:30]:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:29:39 -0500, Derek Tattersall d...@mebtel.net wrote:
I blew away /usr/src and /usr/obj and re-cvsuped this morning. I
attempted to buildworld, only to have the process die in the mkdep step.
CC='clang' mkdep
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:05:16 -0500, Derek Tattersall d...@mebtel.net wrote:
NOTE: I did build a snapshot from /head at -r 216642 last afternoon and
it worked fine with the default CC. So if something broke *after* that
revision try bisecting from -r 216642 to the version you built, to see
if
On Dec 23, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:05:16 -0500, Derek Tattersall d...@mebtel.net wrote:
NOTE: I did build a snapshot from /head at -r 216642 last afternoon and
it worked fine with the default CC. So if something broke *after* that
I blew away /usr/src and /usr/obj and re-cvsuped this morning. I
attempted to buildworld, only to have the process die in the mkdep step.
CC='clang' mkdep -f .depend -a
-I/usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfmerge/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris
Hoping against hope!
Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one
compared to the others that I have seen.
I have put a bzipped error text at the following URL.
http://ns2.wananchi.com/~wash/FreeBSD/
Is there some clue in that file that can help me get a successful
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:42:36AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hoping against hope!
Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one
compared to the others that I have seen.
I have put a bzipped error text at the following URL.
* YONETANI Tomokazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031129 12:17]: wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:42:36AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hoping against hope!
Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one
compared to the others that I have seen.
I have put a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:37:18PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
And on Alpha as well:
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius^M
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev6 -mieee
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius/../../../../contrib/openpam/inc
lude -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius
cc -O -pipe
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius/../../../../contrib/openpam/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_radius/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers
-Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type
cc -elf -ffreestanding -Os -fno-builtin -fno-guess-branch-probability -fomi
t-frame-pointer -mno-align-long-strings -mrtd -DUFS1_AND_UFS2 -I/usr/src/
sys/boot/i386/boot2/../../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/lib
-I. -Wall -Waggregate-return -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
cc -elf -ffreestanding -Os -fno-builtin -fno-guess-branch-probability -fomi
t-frame-pointer -mno-align-long-strings -mrtd -DUFS1_AND_UFS2 -I/usr/src/
sys/boot/i386/boot2/../../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/lib
-I. -Wall -Waggregate-return
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:17:05 +1030, Alex Wilkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSup'd today [Wed Nov 5 17:15:14 CST 2003] and buildworld fails.
$ make buildworld
.
snip
=== lib/libpthread
make: don't know how to make thr_atfork.c. Stop
*** Error code 2
snip
It's already fixed, Daniel has
The problem was solved.
See cvs-all mailing list. thr_atfork.c was forgotten
to be committed.
Just run cvsup again.
Florian
--- Alex Wilkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
CVSup'd today [Wed Nov 5 17:15:14 CST 2003] and
buildworld fails.
$ make buildworld
.
=== lib/libpcap
yacc
CVSup'd today [Wed Nov 5 17:15:14 CST 2003] and buildworld fails.
$ make buildworld
.
=== lib/libpcap
yacc -d -p pcapyy -o grammar.c /usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/grammar.y
ln -sf grammar.h tokdefs.h
lex -t -Ppcapyy /usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/scanner.l
Tinderbox
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libfetch/common.c:60:
error: initializer element is not constant
Under 5.1-CURRENT or i386 cvsuped on 10/23 I get the same failure, with
the additional error message
/usr/src/lib/libfetch/common.c:58: error:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote:
Tinderbox
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libfetch/common.c:60:
error: initializer element is not constant
Under 5.1-CURRENT or i386 cvsuped on 10/23 I get the same failure, with
the
Il Ven, 2003-10-24 alle 17:47, Michael L. Squires ha scritto:
Tinderbox
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libfetch/common.c:60:
error: initializer element is not constant
Under 5.1-CURRENT or i386 cvsuped on 10/23 I get the same failure, with
the additional
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Okay, you philosophize while the rest of us follow the advice of the
folks who have a good understanding of gcc's optimizer. :-)
Not to be disagreeable, but the gcc developers seem to think that -O2
should always produce better code, and never produce
I have re cvsuped 2 days later (Fri Aug 29 10:19:29 EDT 2003) and I am still
getting the same error, can anyone shed some light here?
Thanks.
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../..
/../contrib/openpam/include
Subject: Re: buildworld failure
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Mike Jakubik wrote:
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../..
Turn off -O2 and your build will complete.
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature
On (2003/08/29 11:30), Mike Jakubik wrote:
Why should I have to turn off all my optimization options when building
world?
Because it's not working? Mind you, it's only -O2 that you're
recommended to turn off; -O works fine.
This shouldn't be like that. 4.x always compiled fine with -O2 and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Mike Jakubik
Cc: Current
Subject: Re: buildworld failure
On (2003/08/29 11:30), Mike Jakubik wrote:
Why should I have to turn off all my
On (2003/08/29 11:41), Mike Jakubik wrote:
Yes, I can see that its not working. But this is a solution to the cause,
not the problem. Shouldn't this be fixed?
Depends on how much work is involved in fixing it, and what the negative
impact is of leaving it. Do you know what the impact is?
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I have re cvsuped 2 days later (Fri Aug 29 10:19:29 EDT 2003) and I am
still getting the same error, can anyone shed some light here?
Here's the build output from my build of pam_echo a couple of days ago:
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro
On (2003/08/29 11:48), Robert Watson wrote:
The differences here seem to be:
(1) I'm using -O, not -O2
(2) I'm optimizing -mcpu as pentiumpro, not pentium4
Isn't pentium4 a known-broken optimization at the moment?
Ciao,
Sheldon.
___
[EMAIL
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 09:04, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On (2003/08/29 11:48), Robert Watson wrote:
The differences here seem to be:
(1) I'm using -O, not -O2
(2) I'm optimizing -mcpu as pentiumpro, not pentium4
Isn't pentium4 a known-broken optimization at the moment?
Ciao,
Sheldon.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:05 PM
To: Robert Watson
Cc: Mike Jakubik; Current
Subject: Re: buildworld failure
On (2003/08/29 11:48), Robert Watson wrote:
The differences here seem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Mike Jakubik
Cc: Current
Subject: Re: buildworld failure
On (2003/08/29 11:41), Mike Jakubik wrote:
Yes, I can see that its not working
Mike Jakubik wrote:
I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get
failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of
think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld
with -O2, I think its worth taking a look at.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Depends on how much work is involved in fixing it, and what the negative
impact is of leaving it. Do you know what the impact is?
I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile
world and get failures. Specially people coming
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:36:46PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get
failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of
think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:04:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Isn't pentium4 a known-broken optimization at the moment?
No, not since GCC 3.2.x.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been using freebsd since the 2.x days, I have always compiled world
and ports with -O2, and never had any instability issues due to the
optimizations. I have switched back to -O and -march=pentium4, the
buildworld finished ok.
Lucky you.
Hi,
buildworld stops in libpam:
...
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_deny
cc -O2 -pipe
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_deny/../../../../contrib/openpam/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_deny/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers -Werror
-Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
=== lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo
cc -O2 -pipe
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../../../contrib/openpam/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers -Werror
-Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:02:31 -0400
From: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Reifenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: -current buildworld failure in libpam
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:59:44AM
Hello -CURRENT, nice to meet you. My name is Michael Oliver, and I have
been running FreeBSD for a few years, and am a BIG fan. I have recently
decided to run -CURRENT on my laptop (Gateway SOLO-9300cl), and on my most
recent buildworld (past -CURRENT upgrades have worked), I am having trouble.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:05:38 -0400, Michael W. Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello -CURRENT, nice to meet you. My name is Michael Oliver, and I have
been running FreeBSD for a few years, and am a BIG fan. I have recently
decided to run -CURRENT on my laptop (Gateway SOLO-9300cl), and on my
+--- On Thursday, June 19, 2003 09:38,
| Jeremy Messenger proclaimed:
|
| On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:05:38 -0400, Michael W. Oliver
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hello -CURRENT, nice to meet you. My name is Michael Oliver, and I
| have been running FreeBSD for a few years, and am a BIG fan. I
Got this on a buildworld from current sources just now, is this possibly
related to the commit to sys/cdefs.h from DES ?
=== usr.bin/xlint/llib
lint -cghapbx -Cposix /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lposix
llib-lposix:
In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/types.h:45,
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Got this on a buildworld from current sources just now, is this possibly
related to the commit to sys/cdefs.h from DES ?
I did not touch cdefs.h, David did. The commit message was
inaccurate; while it claims that I submitted the patch, I'm only
responsible for
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The #error line he added is incorrect as it breaks compliant
applications which do not use the nonstandard and nonportable
alloca(3).
The attached patch *may* fix this. It is currently undergoing
testing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
Hello,
Below is a buildworld failure on a 5.1-RELEASE box with a Generic kernel:
building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function
Getting the following message on a buildworld:
mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c:48:27:
This is already be fixed.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Magda writes:
Getting the following message on a buildworld:
mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c
/usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c
Just to let you know me bad for the report I emailed yesterday. It was just
the fact I was using -j4 and so I guess it got ahead of itself. Without the -
j4 the current cvsup of HEAD has built with no problems.
Regards, Matt.
---
Matt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xtaz.co.uk/
---
To
Yeah, that fixed the above mentioned problem.. however i'm running into a build
problem about an hour later, related to telnet.. maybe it was fixed overnight in cvs,
i'll see if it will build now.
Let me know how it goes... I may wanna try that
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:16:04AM -0500, Jeff Utter wrote:
Yeah, that fixed the above mentioned problem.. however i'm running into a build
problem about an hour later, related to telnet.. maybe it was fixed overnight in cvs,
i'll see if it will build now.
I don't think so, I cvsupped about 30
: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: make buildworld failure
: On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:16:04AM -0500, Jeff Utter wrote:
: Yeah, that fixed the above mentioned problem.. however i'm running into
a build problem about an hour later, related to telnet.. maybe it was fixed
overnight in cvs
Apologies if this comes through again after this. I sent it from a different
account this afternoon and it doesn't appear to have got through so I'm
sending it again.
I get a different problem to the telnet buildworld failure:
=== lib/liby
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m
Got this today... src is fresh from cvsup2
mkdep -f
pend -a-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../crypto/openssh
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I
/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../libpam
PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Utter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: make buildworld failure
I'm having the same results here... i've been trying to figure out what
the problem is for a while.. i think it's just
i think my system is building successfully now.. i did 2 things:
1.) deleted my whole src tree, and re-downloaded it
2.) cp /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/idea/idea.h /usr/src/crypto/openssh/
not sure which one fixed it, but it's been building for about 20 minutes, and i think
it's past the
given nor endorsed by it.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Utter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nick H. -- Technical Support Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: make buildworld failure
i think my system is building successfully now.. i
I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld-elf.
One error and a whole lot of warnings. I don't know where I should start as
I'm new to current (even though it's technically not -current). I swear I
followed the instructions in UPGRADING. Any help would be greatly
recent changes to either file. Any ideas on what was going on?
Thanks again,
Evan Dower
From: Evan Dower [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:17:14 -0800
I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:15:24AM -0800, Evan Dower wrote:
An update:
CVSup'ing didn't fix the problem, but when I deleted the rtld.c and mv'd
/etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hide, it stopped at
/usr/src/contrib/amd/amd/srvr_nfs.c. So, I deleted that file, CVSup'd, and
built again, and
Hi all,
I just subscribed to the mailing lists today after upgrading to
5.0RC2, so I'm not sure if this has been reported or not. I'm relatively
new to FreeBSD (although I'm a long time Linux user), so I'll report how
I installed, just in case I missed something that might be causing
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P. Got the following error
during cleaning:
=== usr.sbin/fwcontrol
cd: can't cd to /usr/src/usr.sbin/fwcontrol
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin.
*** Error code 1
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
Sources updated Dec 31 from anoncvs.freebsd.org on a sparc64. Didn't matter
whether I used cvs update with -P or without -P.
Try cvs co -P.
Got the following error during cleaning:
=== usr.sbin/fwcontrol
cd: can't cd to
101 - 200 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
