Hi,
Lars Eggert wrote:
Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Funky boot messages, but the system is usable after. This is with
today's -current:
atapci0: Intel ICH2 UDMA100 controller port
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of
Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when trying to load
nautilus. Nautilus loads fine after removing the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:02:13PM -0500, wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of
Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when trying to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:56:57PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:02:13PM -0500, wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current,
as
Le 2003-08-30, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
I guess I wrote that too soon, it just locked up again. This time
though, the machine rebooted after about 10 seconds so I could not get
to another machine to see if I could poke around.
If it rebooted, then maybe it panic'd. Do you have a kernel core
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:39:59AM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
OK, trivial one. Thanks to all who contributed feedback on this issue.
Thomas.
Index: atapi-cam.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of
Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when trying to load
nautilus. Nautilus loads fine after removing the atapicam option.
Atapicam worked fine prior to ATAng.
Strange. No
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of
Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when trying to load
nautilus. Nautilus loads fine after removing the
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
console. There was nothing written to the log file that I remember but
I should check that again tonight when I get home. I will also try to
ssh in from another machine and see if the network is still up.
Yes. A serial console could also perhaps
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:53, Glenn Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of
Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when trying to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:17:33PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:53, Glenn Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait :
When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current,
Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Funky boot messages, but the system is usable after. This is with
today's -current:
atapci0: Intel ICH2 UDMA100 controller port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device
Le 2003-08-25, Matt écrivait :
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc015e59e
stack pointer = 0x10:0xd717bac0
frame pointer = 0x10:0xd717bacc
code segment = base 0x0, limit
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 19:25:42 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2003-08-25, Matt ?crivait :
db trace
free_hcb(c40f1040,c03c7e40,101,c41d5800,c1528130) at free_hcb+0x2e
atapi_action(c40f1440,c41d5800,c0132b33,c41db000,c41d5800) at
atapi_action+ox56c
OK, so that presumably means we're
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
After updating to ATAng my DVD drive isn't detected. I get following message:
ata1-slave: FAILURE -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Just want to report initial success with this - my smp machine previously
would not recognize my offboard pci-based ide devices
My DVD drive is no longer working.. anyway around this?
Before ATAng:
acd1: DVD-ROM HL-DT-STDVD-ROM GDR8160B at ata1-slave PIO4
After ATAng:
ata1-slave: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY status=51READY,DSC,ERROR
error=4ABORTED
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Soren,
My machine panic when pax a directory to the software raid. The same step works just
fine for an
older kernel before the ATAng commit. After this panic, the raid is broken and has to
be created
manually. The controller is a Highpoint 370 with bios 2.34 with 2 IDE IBM DTLA-307030
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
After updating to ATAng my DVD drive isn't detected. I
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 03:10:27 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
update as atacontrol etc
Le 2003-08-24, Matt écrivait :
This did work perfectly with the old ATA, but the new ATA panic's. I have
found that it is due to having device atapicam for the SCSI emulation. If I
I'll need a backtrace please.
Thanks,
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
Yes it does.
I've noticed that, in ata-raid.c:ar_rebuid(), Giant is
locked and never unlocked. Is it ok?
% ident ata-raid.c
ata-raid.c:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.c,v 1.67 2003/08/24 17:48:05 obrien Exp $
%
It seems HATANOU Tomomi wrote:
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
Yes it does.
I've noticed that, in ata-raid.c:ar_rebuid(), Giant is
locked and never unlocked. Is it ok?
It is only locked in the rebuild thread, its not needed anymore actually.
Thomas Quinot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll need a backtrace please.
Thanks,
Thomas.
I recompiled the kernel with full debugging again. Unfortunatly all I can get
out of it is the ddb prompt trace as the system does not get far enough into
boot to configure swap and a dumpdevice etc so I
On 2003-08-24 at 11:27:05 Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Building went fine here on my VMware test box, but the new kernel spat
out a warning (which wasn't fatal, as it doesn't panic):
It seems Dimitry Andric wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On 2003-08-24 at 11:27:05 Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Building went fine here on my VMware test box, but the new
Le 2003-08-25, Matt écrivait :
db trace
free_hcb(c40f1040,c03c7e40,101,c41d5800,c1528130) at free_hcb+0x2e
atapi_action(c40f1440,c41d5800,c0132b33,c41db000,c41d5800) at
atapi_action+ox56c
OK, so that presumably means we're going through action_oom, and so you
should have had one of the
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
That should make ATA-run SMP boxes eligible for an impressive increase
in I/O performance... has anyone
It seems Roderick van Domburg wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
Yes it does.
That should make ATA-run SMP boxes eligible
I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don't
immediatly know what's wrong.
I have the following hardware:
ad0:
It seems Matt wrote:
I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don't
immediatly know what's wrong.
I have the
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Matt wrote:
This did work perfectly with the old ATA, but the new ATA panic's. I have
found that it is due to having device atapicam for the SCSI emulation. If I
recompile the kernel with this option commented out the kernel boots and
everything works normally (except the
It seems Wesley Morgan wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Matt wrote:
This did work perfectly with the old ATA, but the new ATA panic's. I have
found that it is due to having device atapicam for the SCSI emulation. If I
recompile the kernel with this option commented out the kernel boots and
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Does ATAng still kill various Seagate drives?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Matt wrote:
I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don't
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Does ATAng still kill various Seagate drives?
Uhm ? what do you mean by
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it
to be around :)
I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam
has been present for a while, and it should have been tested and made
to work -- at least so it
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it
to be around :)
I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam
has been present for a while, and it should have
Hello.
(B
(BI was update 5-current and begin using with ATAng and ust view ata-pci.c.
(BThen I found one question in the source code.
(B
(Bata-pci.c 462 line.
(BDEVMETHOD(device_detach,ata_pci_attach),
(B
(BIs this right?
(BI think, it should be use "ata_pci_dettach" or
It seems Hiroyuki Aizu wrote:
Hello.
I was update 5-current and begin using with ATAng and ust view ata-pci.c.
Then I found one question in the source code.
ata-pci.c 462 line.
DEVMETHOD(device_detach,ata_pci_attach),
Is this right?
I think, it should be use
40 matches
Mail list logo
