Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-27 Thread Jakob Alvermark
On 26 mar 2015, at 22:00, Jakob Alvermark wrote: On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU and becomes very unresponsive and unusable. Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-26 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 03/26/15 22:37, Adrian Chadd wrote: Is there a PR filed with this? There is now: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198936 --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
Is there a PR filed with this? -a On 26 March 2015 at 14:00, Jakob Alvermark ja...@alvermark.net wrote: On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-26 Thread Jakob Alvermark
On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU and becomes very unresponsive and unusable. Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETCONNECTOR over and over again with no apparent

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-26 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 03/26/15 22:37, Adrian Chadd wrote: Is there a PR filed with this? No, do you want me to make one? --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-23 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU and becomes very unresponsive and unusable. Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETCONNECTOR over and over again with no apparent reason. It doesn't happen when using a simple window manager

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-07 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:23 +0100 Jean-S'ebastien P'edron dumbb...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508: https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command: svn

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
Just as a data point, 'stray timeout' happens in clean -current without new patch as well. So whatever that is, it is not caused by the patch. -- Alexander Kabaev I can confirm this, however, when it happens is RARE... it seems like it happens when I am typing in the address bar of

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-04 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:23 +0100 Jean-Sébastien Pédron dumbb...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508: https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command: svn

Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 (take #2)

2015-03-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 03/03/15 23:33, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: Hi! Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508: https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command: svn patch drm-update-38.i.patch There are few