I have received a few reports of panics when loading modules. If you're
going to run it you may want to staticly compile in pseudofs/procfs, etc.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Glenn Gombert wrote:
I have the UMA patch installed on two systems here, a 500Mhz K7 system and
dual PIII SMP
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:24:08PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I have received a few reports of panics when loading modules. If you're
going to run it you may want to staticly compile in pseudofs/procfs, etc.
Jeff,
There were problems with loading modules, but I haven't
seen any panics.
There were problems with loading modules, but I haven't
seen any panics. The loading problems were fixed yesterday
in revisions 1.77 and 1.78 of kern_linker.c. I suspect
people, who imay have had panics, need to update to the latest
version of kern_linker.c.
--
Steve
Good news for
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:36:53PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
There were problems with loading modules, but I haven't
seen any panics. The loading problems were fixed yesterday
in revisions 1.77 and 1.78 of kern_linker.c. I suspect
people, who imay have had panics, need to update to
I have the UMA patch installed on two systems here, a 500Mhz K7 system and
dual PIII SMP box, both of which have WITNESS and INVARIANTS configured in
the kernel. I will run them for the next few days, and report anything that
looks unusual in operation :)
GG.
I'd like people to test with
