On 8/9/14, 2:43 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/8/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some
hours it is crashing with:
# poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date
[...]
mtree: illegal option -- N
On 8/9/2014 1:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:27:40PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures?
Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look
El día Monday, August 11, 2014 a las 12:14:39PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
when I terminate the dialog, it seems that the pkg-* tools
are used (which ofc are not installed on the host):
=== Setting user-specified options for kde-4.12.5 and dependencies
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static:
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:27:40PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures?
Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it
on the next run?
Yes
On 8/8/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some
hours it is crashing with:
# poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date
[...]
mtree: illegal option -- N
usage: mtree [-LPUcdeinqruxw] [-f spec]
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 07:12:15PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribió:
Hi!
The host where poudriere is running is:
# uname -a
FreeBSD vm-tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18
12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0
release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end
of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way.
Hi!
i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update
the host where poudriere is running before?
Yes. Go for 10.0-REL p7, then retry.
Can you explain, why?
bdrewery@ knows much more about it than I do 8-)
I only know that it helps to use a recent system if
On 8/8/2014 2:11 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0
release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end
of 10.0 so you should
On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures?
Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it
on the next run?
Yes I agree this should probably change. I'll evaluate it after the 3.1
release which is
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a
build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release
jumps are not supported. You can usually get away with a head host using
a
On 8/8/2014 2:42 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a
build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release
jumps are not supported. You can
12 matches
Mail list logo
