Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64

2010-09-06 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Peter Reo Molnar wrote: Hello, I tried setup NAT with IPFW, compiled my kernel and I found that there is very slow connection. After I disabled NAT and IPFW then speed was increased. 64-bit FreeBSD 9-CURRENT : With IPFW: 1.2 MB/sec Without IPFW: 33 MB/sec my ipfw work with i386

Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64

2010-09-06 Thread Randy Bush
Ian FREISLICH wrote: Peter Reo Molnar wrote: Hello, I tried setup NAT with IPFW, compiled my kernel and I found that there is very slow connection. After I disabled NAT and IPFW then speed was increased. 64-bit FreeBSD 9-CURRENT : With IPFW: 1.2 MB/sec Without IPFW: 33

Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64

2010-09-06 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 06.09.2010 um 13:08 schrieb Randy Bush: i never managed to figure out how to convert my pppoe nat config to ipfw natting. I did not see a significant improvement going from ppp(8)+9 and ipfw to ppp(8) and pf+nat. Since ppp(8) already incurs the kernel/userland cost, having it handle NAT

Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64

2010-09-06 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Randy Bush wrote: Ian FREISLICH wrote: Peter Reo Molnar wrote: Hello, I tried setup NAT with IPFW, compiled my kernel and I found that there is very slow connection. After I disabled NAT and IPFW then speed was increased. 64-bit FreeBSD 9-CURRENT : With IPFW: 1.2

Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64

2010-09-06 Thread Randy Bush
I'm sure you could coax these scripts to do what you want, but unless you have more than 50mbps I doubt it's worth the effort. i live in a first world country. 100/100 for 3250yen/mo (that's about 35usd. randy ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing