Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > That's kind of the point of adding the fields that we did > > (mc_len, mc_fpformat). They can be used to help validate > > the contents and to allow extensions. We also have some > > spare slots, but the last incarnation of u

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Daniel Eischen wrote: > That's kind of the point of adding the fields that we did > (mc_len, mc_fpformat). They can be used to help validate > the contents and to allow extensions. We also have some > spare slots, but the last incarnation of ucontext_t also > had spare slots and it wasn't nearly

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > Unfortunately, we didn't get expansion of the i386 mcontext_t to make > > room for SSE, into 4.0, and the problem has been mostly ignored since > > then. Looks like it is a large problem. > > Any chance of avoiding this in the f

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: > Unfortunately, we didn't get expansion of the i386 mcontext_t to make > room for SSE, into 4.0, and the problem has been mostly ignored since > then. Looks like it is a large problem. Any chance of avoiding this in the future by adding an "extensible, but known to be subopti

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. > > > > I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that > > 4.x statically

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | Boot from a kernel from a day or two ago and you should be fine. Unless | you build every day, your kernel.old/kernel should be in agreement with | libc_r I do build everyday and Thanks, ed To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | threads is broken right now.. | due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have | a disagreement regarding something.. | Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or | so.. | please be patient for a da

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. > > I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that > 4.x statically compiled threaded binaries will not work right because

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that 4.x statically compiled threaded binaries will not work right because we've changed the kernel ABI in an incompatible way..

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > threads is broken right now.. > > > due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have > > > a disagreement regarding something.. >

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > threads is broken right now.. > > due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have > > a disagreement regarding something.. > > Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offli

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > threads is broken right now.. > due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have > a disagreement regarding something.. > Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or > so.. > please be patient for a day or so

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Wesley Morgan
Boot from a kernel from a day or two ago and you should be fine. Unless you build every day, your kernel.old/kernel should be in agreement with libc_r On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > threads is broken right now.. > due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have a disagreement regarding something.. Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or so.. please be patient for a day or so (we hope). On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Edwin Culp wrote: > I

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 00:32, Edwin Culp wrote: > I just realized that slapd dumps core with: > > Fatal error '_pq_insert_head: prioq not protected!' at line 185 in file > /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 22) > Abort (core dumped) > > I have recompiled openldap and d